A steaming pile of popular art
Don't pretend the Carry Ons were any good, says Robin Buss: Carry On night Channel 4
Sunday 06 September 1998
It was Janet Street-Porter who gave the game away. "You can't call them art films, but to me they are popular art," she said, with a dismissive aside about how it annoyed her to hear Powell, Pressburger and Kubrick held up as the luminaries of British cinema. Again and again, we were told how "popular" and how "British" the Carry On films were: British as seaside postcards, British as pantomime, "a broad expression of English vulgarity", according to Malcolm Bradbury. Philip Dodd found that the use of variations around a theme reminded him of Bach.
The most British thing of all, however, was the one that wasn't mentioned: class. Unlike the Boulting Brothers comedies, or the early Doctor films, the Carry Ons were essentially about working-class characters and appealed to a working-class audience, which knew it would not be intellectually challenged or made to feel excluded. Above all, its innate conservatism would not be offended by the treatment of sex, which was guaranteed to remain on the level of flying bras and splitting pants and puns about "big ones", and never venture into the disturbing territory of human relationships. The off-screen reality, as Carry On Darkly, reminded us, was that the stars of these films were plagued by addictions and traumas: all three documentaries used the same clip of Charles Hawtrey and Kenneth Williams dressing up in women's clothes, from Carry On Sergeant, because it takes on a new meaning in the light of the actors' persona1 lives.
The mixture of sexual innuendo and prudishness which characterised the series was unable to survive the change in attitudes during the Sixties. The Carry On continued; but even the documentary Carry On Snogging was unable to pretend that they kept pace with their times. Attempts to adapt the formula, to include actual nudity and sex, failed because they violated the code that the films themselves had established; the Carry Ons were carried off by social change and should have been decently buried. If they keep on coming back to our screens, it is probably to give television pundits a draught of nostalgia and the illusion of being in touch with popular taste.
TVJamie's Sugar Rush reveal's campaigning chef's new foe
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 What marriage would look like if we actually followed the Bible
- 2 If these extraordinarily powerful images of a dead Syrian child washed up on a beach don't change Europe's attitude to refugees, what will?
- 3 'Heartbreaking' Syria orphan photo wasn't taken in Syria and not of orphan
- 4 Bob Geldof offers to take four refugee families into his home 'immediately' as he condemns humanitarian crisis as a ‘f**king disgrace'
- 5 Orthorexia nervosa: How becoming obsessed with healthy eating can lead to malnutrition
Three million books were judged by their covers - this is what happened
Anne Hathaway is already being stung by Hollywood ageism, aged 32
No Escape, film review: Thriller generates plenty of excitement but soon collapses
The Lobster trailer: Colin Farrell has 45 days to find a lover or he'll be turned into an animal
Spanish town saved by botched restoration of century-old Christian 'Ecce Homo' fresco of Jesus
Britain to take more refugees as Cameron bows to pressure after more than 250,000 back our campaign
Senior British politicians tell David Cameron: When dead children are being washed up on beaches – it's time to act
Jeremy Corbyn calls Osama bin Laden's killing a 'tragedy' - but was it taken out of context?
If these extraordinarily powerful images of a dead Syrian child washed up on a beach don't change Europe's attitude to refugees, what will?
Make your voice heard: Sign The Independent's petition to welcome refugees
If you're not already angry about the refugee crisis, here's a history lesson to remind you why you really should be