Alain de Botton Column: A good idea from... Pascal
Alain de Botton
Alain de Botton is a philosopher, writer and television presenter. His books include Essays in Love (published when he was only 23), How Proust Can Change Your Life (1997), Status Anxiety (2004) and Religion for Atheists (2012)
Sunday 25 April 1999
However, we need only read a few pages of the Pensees of Blaise Pascal (1623-62) to appreciate how entirely misguided this approach must be, because Pascal pulls off the feat of being one of the most pessimistic figures in Western thought and simultaneously one of the most cheering. The combination is typical: the darkest thinkers are almost always the ones who can lift our mood.
Pascal was born in Auvergne in June 1623, and from the earliest days, learnt to look at the glass of life as half-empty. His mother died when he was three, he had few friends, he was a hunchback and always ill. Luckily, he was recognised at an early age - and by more than just his proud family - as a genius. By 12, he had worked out the first 32 propositions of Euclid; he went on to invent the mathematics of probability; he measured atmospheric pressure, constructed a calculating machine and designed Paris's first omnibus. Then, at the age of 36, ill-health forced him to set aside plans to write a large book on religion, and he wrote in its place a brilliant, intensely pessimistic series of aphorisms in defence of Christian belief, the Pensees.
The purpose of the work was to convert readers to God, and Pascal felt the best way to do this was to evoke everything that was terrible about life. Having fully considered the misery of the human condition, he assumed his readers would instantly turn for salvation to the Catholic Church. Unfortunately for Pascal, very few readers have ever read the Pensees like this. The first part of the book, listing what is wrong with life, has always proved far more popular than the second, which suggests what is right with God.
Pascal begins by telling us that earthly happiness is an illusion. The proof is that we always run around escaping ourselves. "If our condition were truly happy we should not need to avoid thinking about it." People will do anything rather than consider their dreadful reality. At the same time, they are tortured by their passions. And perhaps the greatest source of suffering is the most banal - boredom. "We struggle against obstacles, but once they are overcome, rest proves intolerable because of the boredom it produces." Pascal's conclusion: "What is man? A nothing compared to the infinite."
Why should this be cheering? Perhaps because exaggeration is so comforting. Whatever our private disappointments, we can feel fortunate when we compare our mood to Pascal's. Pascal wanted to turn us to God by telling us how awful life was. But by sharing his troubles, he ironically made us feel better - and far less inclined to turn to his beloved Church for salvation.
Review: Imaginative storytelling returns with vigourfilm
Bannatyne leaves Dragon's DenTV
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Stephen Fry ‘criticises Operation Yewtree in dinner party rant’ calling for tougher laws to deter false sex abuse allegations
- 2 Why I'm on the brink of burning my Israeli passport
- 3 Israel-Gaza conflict: ‘Sderot cinema’ image shows Israelis with popcorn and chairs 'cheering as missiles strike Palestinian targets'
- 4 War is war: Why I stand with Israel
- 5 Blackest is the new black: Scientists have developed a material so dark that you can't see it...
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
War is war: Why I stand with Israel
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
Socialist Worker called to apologise over ‘vile’ article saying Eton schoolboy Horatio Chapple's death is ‘reason to save the polar bears’
Emergency data law: David Cameron plots to bring back snoopers’ charter
NUT strike: David Cameron announces crackdown on strike action ahead of mass industrial action