Regulator probes charity's relationship with Prince
The Prince of Wales's architecture charity has been forced to explain its relationship with him following claims that it is acting as his "private lobby firm".
The Charity Commission raised a series of concerns with the Prince's Foundation for the Built Environment after receiving a complaint that the organisation had gone beyond its remit and tried to influence a number of planning decisions.
Republic, the anti-monarchy group, made the complaint to the charity regulator claiming Charles had used his organisation to enforce his "personal tastes".
Graham Smith, a spokesman for the organisation, welcomed the move and said: "The Charity Commission's reply to our complaint indicates there are serious questions to be answered about the relationship with Prince Charles and the charities he has set up and whether they are pursuing a public good, or working for Charles's benefit.
"We believe the relationship between him and the charities he has set up must be made clear, to ensure they're not being used as his own private lobby firms.
"Charities are legally obliged to remain independent and to take decisions in the interests of the objects of the charity. They are required to work for the public good, not personal interest."
Republic's complaint was based on claims made by the Guardian newspaper last month that Charles had used private pressure to influence the country's planning process.
Modernist designs for the Chelsea Barracks site in London were scrapped after the heir to the throne directly intervened by writing to the Middle East owners of the site and asking them to reconsider the proposals for the project.
When the plans were dropped in June, a spokesman for the development said Charles's Foundation would be amongst the stakeholders asked to discuss any new submissions.
Following the complaint, the Commission ordered the Foundation to explain its trustee decision-making, the activities it undertakes to further its charitable purposes for the public benefit, and its relationship with the prince.
A spokeswoman for the regulator said: "We have received a complaint about the charity, the Prince's Foundation.
"We have contacted the charity raising a number of issues relating to the complaint and concerns which have also been highlighted in the press, and have received a response from the charity.
"We will consider this response in assessing our regulatory role in the matter."
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Australia to impose 24-hour curfew on all cats to protect endangered species
- 2 Model's video shoot on the beach interrupted by sudden landing of a group of illegal migrants
- 3 The difference between a psychopath and a sociopath
- 4 MH370 search: Boeing 777 wing that could match missing plane found on the French island of Reunion
- 5 'Killer robots' with AI must be banned, urge Stephen Hawking, Noam Chomsky and thousands of others in open letter
Frank Ocean, where's that new album at?
Donovan interview: The singer is releasing a greatest hits album to mark his 50th year in folk
Jesse Pinkman's meth den house from Breaking Bad is yours for $1.6 million
Top Gear: Jenson Button reportedly joining Chris Evans as replacement host
R Kelly's Ignition (Remix) is the most nostalgic song going, according to Spotify
Yvette Cooper: Our choice is years of Tory rule under Jeremy Corbyn – or a return to a Labour government
Labour leadership contender Jeremy Corbyn says 'we can learn a great deal from Karl Marx'
I am the Jeremy Corbyn supporter that many will tell you doesn't exist
Public anger after French sunbather beaten up by gang for wearing a bikini in Reims park
Labour leadership: New poll shows party is now even 'less electable' than under Ed Miliband
Labour leadership contest: I would never quit the party, says Liz Kendall