ART / Always check the small prints: Revised, copied and faked, original prints by Old Masters are difficult to spot. Which, says Dalya Alberge, is part of their appeal
Tuesday 12 April 1994
Confused? You're not alone. Prints, as any specialist in the field will acknowledge, are a tricky business. Not only are there many different techniques - etching and engraving, woodcut and drypoint, mezzotint and aquatint - but, to complicate matters, 'print' is an all-purpose word: it is used not only for an original work of art, printed in relatively small numbers by the artist himself, but also for posters, postcards and photographs, which can be knocked off with the ease of photocopying.
The chances of picking up an original off a market stall are remote. There are fewer than 50 reputable print-dealers worldwide and, at the annual London Original Print Fair at the Royal Academy, you will find the most respected of them.
As Elizabeth Harvey-Lee, one of this year's 22 exhibitors, says: 'A lot of Old Master prints are reasonable in comparison with modern prints - yet most people think the older ones are more expensive . . . You can buy a nice Old Master for a few hundred pounds.' That will buy you a print by Jan Lievens, who shared a studio with Rembrandt and whose work is good enough to have been misattributed to him, or something by the great, though relatively neglected, French etcher Jacques Callot (1592-1635).
Today, a photograph can fetch more than a print made centuries ago. Yet on a stand taken by Olimpia Theodoli, an Italian-born dealer, prints can be had for as little as a tenner. Their investment value is nil - they are often only one in a run of thousands - but their charm is in having been printed in the 16th century. At the other end of the scale, for pounds 10,000, she has a Rembrandt done by Rembrandt - his Nativity. Here, part of the right-hand corner is missing, whereas the second state indicates that Rembrandt later altered the plate. Rembrandt frequently altered his plates - printing some in four to six different states to correct errors in the print-run. An image that Rembrandt saw as flawed is, for today's collectors, all the more rare and valuable since an error often indicates an early state.
There is a limit to how many impressions a plate or block can produce: the earlier the impression, the clearer the lines. Copies are easier to spot. Theodoli has put two versions of Rembrandt's Rat Catcher on sale side by side - a pounds 3,000 second-state print, with a 17th-century artist's copy thrown in for free. The real give-away is that the copy is a reverse image of the original (see illustration). So even if you jib at the price, at least you can be sure of not falling for any false impressions.
Royal Academy, Piccadilly, London, W1, 14-17 Apr, 11am-6pm daily; pounds 5 incl catalogue ( pounds 2.50 concs)
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Sainsbury's '50p challenge' poster telling staff to encourage customers to spend more placed in shop window instead of staff room
- 2 Five-year-old Iris Grace is raising awareness of autism through her extraordinary paintings
- 3 HeForShe campaign: Iceland to follow up Emma Watson speech with UN women's rights conference – for men only
- 4 Car tax disc changes: Two days to go - and they affect you much more than just not displaying a piece of paper
- 5 Teenagers irritable because early school hours mess with their biological clocks
Isis, we are told, is a 'clear and dangerous threat to our way of life'. I’m sorry, but I just don’t buy it
Exclusive: 'Putin's Russia has been my biggest regret,' says Nato's outgoing Secretary General
The Osborne Ultimatum: Chancellor’s benefits freeze bombshell will affect ten million households
There’s no excuse for Dave Lee Travis’s behaviour, but we need to keep a sense of proportion
Should gay sex be illegal? 16% of Britons think so
Mark Reckless becomes second Tory MP to defect to Ukip in a month
- < Previous
- Next >