Banksy claims new World Trade Center is a 'disaster' and shows the 'terrorists won'
The New York Times declined to run the controversial opinion piece
Monday 28 October 2013
Banksy appears to have claimed that the new World Trade Center in New York is "104 floors of compromise" and shows that the "terrorists won" when they attacked the US on September 11.
In an opinion piece that was rejected by the New York Times, but which the artist later posted on his website, the structure is described as a "shyscraper" that resembles something that might be built "in Canada".
The newspaper's decision not to publish the piece led to another Banksy artwork – a mural in Greenpoint saying: "This site contains blocked messages."
It's a dark and unexpected turn for the artist, whose New York residency this October has been characterised by light, witty pieces that give arch commentary on the social issues of today.
On his website, the artist wrote: "Today's piece was going to be an op-ed column in the New York Times. But they declined to publish what I supplied. Which was this…"
It reads: "Remarkably for such a tall structure, One World Trade lacks any self-confidence. How does it stand up without a spine? It looks like it never wanted to be built in the first place.
"It reminds you of a really tall kid at a party, awkwardly shifting his shoulders trying not to stand out from the crowd. It's the first time I've ever seen a shy skyscraper.
"It would be easy to view One World Trade Centre as a betrayal of everyone who lost their lives on September 11th, because it so clearly proclaims the terrorists won. Those 10 men have condemned us to live in a world more mediocre than the one they attacked, rather than be the catalyst for a dazzling new one.
"You really need to put up a better building in front of it right away. Or better still, let the kids with the roller poles finish it off.
"Because you currently have under construction a one thousand foot tall sign that reads – New York – we lost our nerve."
A spokeswoman for the New York Times told Gothamist: "He did submit an op-ed and art. We couldn't agree on either the piece or the art, so we did reject it."
She added that the piece submitted was different to that on the artist's website, saying: "It was close, just not exactly the same."
Review: Imaginative storytelling returns with vigourfilm
Bannatyne leaves Dragon's DenTV
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Howard Jacobson: Let's see the 'criticism' of Israel for what it really is
- 2 Gingers face extinction due to climate change, scientists warn
- 3 Brazil vs Germany World Cup 2014: In defence of Mesut Ozil - the Arsenal midfielder works magic in the shadows
- 4 BBC’s new Game of Thrones slayer 'The Last Kingdom' relies on Saxon appeal, creators say
- 5 PornHub begs users to stop uploading video clips of Brazil getting beaten 7-1
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
British jihadist calls for 'flag of Islam' over Downing Street and Buckingham Palace
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
There’s a nasty smell in the political air – and it’s coming from the Tories