Art

Rain (AM and PM) 3° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

God save the Damien Hirst rip-off industry!

Artists launch orchestrated campaign to flout copyright of Britart 'bully'

By Arifa Akbar, Arts Correspondent

<em>REFACE - Masterwork 2</em> by James Cauty<br/> For the Love of Disruptive Strategies and Utopian Visions in Contemporary Art and Culture No.8 - Ltd Edition Print

www.redragtoabull.com

REFACE - Masterwork 2 by James Cauty
For the Love of Disruptive Strategies and Utopian Visions in Contemporary Art and Culture No.8 - Ltd Edition Print

It all began when the Turner Prize-winning multimillionaire artist Damien Hirst threatened to sue an entrepreneurial 16-year-old who used an image of his diamond-encrusted skull, For the Love of God, to create a collage to sell on the internet.

Hirst reported the teenager, who styles himself Cartrain, to the Design and Artists Copyright Society, which ordered him to hand over his £200 profit to Hirst, as reported in The Independent last December. Now a collective of prominent artists is seeking revenge on the teenager's behalf.

Creators of the website redragtoabull.com, who include Jimmy Cauty, a former member of KLF, Jamie Reid, best known for designing the Sex Pistols' "God Save The Queen" single cover, and artist Billy Childish, have produced a series of skull images which flouts copyright regulations and deliberately provokes one of the most powerful – and richest – artists alive.

Writing to The Independent, Cauty said: "Unlike Cartrain and his gallery, we are not intimidated by lawyers and if an injunction is issued, we will simply ignore it on the grounds of freedom of speech." He suggested the concept of copyright, which was changing in the music industry, had some way to go before it was "abolished and replaced with something more flexible".

Reid, meanwhile, called Hirst a "hypocritical and greedy art bully", adding: "Hasn't he got enough?"

The limited edition images, sold under the title For the Love of Disruptive Strategies and Utopian Visions in Contemporary Art and Culture, a pun on the title of Hirst's skull, are designed by Reid as a deliberate variation on The Sex Pistols' cover. There is also an image of a man whose face is superimposed with Hirst's skull reading a book entitled Copyright and Intellectual Property Law.

Another image pretends to have been created by Hirst's fellow YBAs, the Chapman Brothers. It bears a graffitied skull image and the words: "We Always Knew You were a C**t!" An exact copy of Cartrain's collage is also on sale. A representative of Hirst's company, Science, did not comment yesterday, but Jake Chapman good-naturedly said: "To be honest, after our persistent 'collaborations' with Goya, we're the last people on earth to claim the sanctity of authorship."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Tee hee hee
[info]mssuperior wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 10:18 am (UTC)
I'm laughing so much I hurt. Hurrah! At last the Emepror's New Clothes have found their place on the High Street and Hirst is a busted flush. Oh it's wonderful! Thank you. made my day.
bah!
[info]bahcymru wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 12:18 pm (UTC)
what have all these bitter failures got against success??
cynical britain sucks...
[info]bahcymru wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 12:21 pm (UTC)
i mean cheer up, all parties concerned should get over themselves
cynical Britain
[info]leedsrob wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 12:26 pm (UTC)
Oh yeah cynical - but that's the word for Hirst not his detractors, Hirst neither conceives nor executes his art and is one big bogus rip off merchant - how cynical is that?
String him up...
[info]spnfl wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 12:53 pm (UTC)
...by the balls outside the tate modern and pelt him with all of his worthless so-called art until he screams for it to stop and admits he's a complete useless toss-piece.
the very best of british
[info]soapbox007 wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 04:06 pm (UTC)
I don't understand bahcymru's comment - "...bitter failures" (?!)

After reading what Red Rag to a Bull was all about - and who was going to benefit from their sale - I was reminded of what's so good about Britain. Good luck gents. No cynicism here.
[info]rjbo wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 04:58 pm (UTC)
Ah ha! Jimmy Cauty of The KLF fame!
RICH!!!
[info]sparkozy wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 05:11 pm (UTC)
Very Rich, Damien, that you are/were suing that kid for reproducing, and yet altering, your image of the diamond-encrusted skull, when in fact you you sold, for a fortune, an anatomical model that has been used in science classes for over 100 years. Face it; You are a wanker!
Hirst
[info]hiragani wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 05:18 pm (UTC)
Hirst is so in love with money and success that he has lost his sense of humour, the very thing that made him famous in the first place. He might be super rich, but he's hyper sad now.
[info]twb103 wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 05:27 pm (UTC)
Good on these guys for highlighting the disgusting, pretentious and obscene nature of Damien Hirst Industries and those idiots that buy his contrived shite.
[info]a_chan01 wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 07:26 pm (UTC)
This is so awesome. These guys are great for doing this! What a bully, what he did is like a bigger kid stealing a smaller kid's lunch money. RIDICULOUS!
It's little wonder his 'art' is such shite...
[info]tatcawh wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 08:43 pm (UTC)
.... when his head is stuck that far up his arse. Kudos to the Bros Chapman though, they at least can't be accused of hypocrisy.
Thek
[info]grgryus wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 08:52 pm (UTC)
Well , you know , Hirst nicked it all from Paul Thek in the first place anyway...
Re: Thek
[info]shubeler wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 03:07 pm (UTC)
Yep, and has not mankind been decorating skulls and bones since time immemorial?
Sell it to yer mates, Damien
[info]mat_jagger wrote:
Saturday, 14 February 2009 at 03:47 am (UTC)
Kudos to Cartrain for showing Hirst how crappy his ideas are. Go on then stuck a few diamonds onto a urinal and call it ART. Thats never been done before, has it?
Wonderfull
[info]non_secular wrote:
Saturday, 14 February 2009 at 08:26 am (UTC)
A wonderfull and timely initative , Damien Hirst is in the same league of multi-milionair hypocrites as the Stones where when they stole all the profits from the Verve because of the use of one line of their hits.. Clearly a case where property becomes theft ..
Anyone Ever Hear Anything Nice?
[info]whiterabbi7 wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 12:11 pm (UTC)
Anyone ever heard a nice word said about Hirst? I live with an active artists and I haven't, everyone who meets or has anything to do with him seems to brand him a total arse.

I thought everyone was on a bandwagon in hating this guy, I thought it was jealousy speaking, but the more I hear about him, the more I am convinced that he is simply a rich, spoillled little brat who, now he doesn't play fast brum-brums, is systematically ruining a very fragile industry. Reading about Hirst or reading Emin's column in the papers is enough to convince me that modern British "art" is a total sham.

I once saw him/ Emin being interviewed by Jon Snow for the news, Hirst was constantly just running away and hiding behind exhibits, peeking out and grinning like some idiot on LSD and making squeeking noises. Even snow was finding this hard to deal with and flatly mentioned the words "teenage child" if I remember right. There was one moment when Snow paused over a bike laid on its side and asked what it symbolised. Emin shot a look that seriously suggested, "I dunno, we're just at it. Damien was riding this bike around the studio after 2 bottles of wine, grinning like an idiot and he crashed and, "MIAO! WOOF!" It symbolises the transitory nature of the universe!" She just totally made it all up, it was a bike on its side, there was nothing deep about it and she plainly had to think quickly to make it appear deep, It really did look like someone had just crashed it whilst playing and then chucked a couple of cones around it to highlight it.

Please go back to playing brum-brums and stop ruining an entire industry comprised of genuinely talented people trying to make a living. I know that my respect for Brit-art could not get much lower.
Hirst
[info]bundubasher wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 02:05 pm (UTC)
Damien is not an artist.He is a mega and greedy businessman,A taxidermist and a tradesman.He employs a couple of hundred people to install his tat which, I am led to believe by people like Street Porter ,I am unenlightened ignoramus if I do not regard it is post modern "art".

That it sells for repulsive amounts of money indicates nothing of merit.Kylie Minogue also sells and she is also tat, which says more about the show offs of oligarchs and nouveau riche lack of taste, than it does about mine.

He gets an" idea" - . mostly swiped in a collage of this and that idea of others ,and now there is a complain HE is ripped off? Come on.Pull the other one.
Irony
[info]kirstym2k wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 09:20 pm (UTC)
It seems ironic that Damien Hirst should threaten to sue someone for appropriating his artwork when he has been sued for the very same reason. In 2000, for example, toy company Humbrol said his sculpture, Hymn, was a direct copy of its Young Scientist Anatomy Set... and Hirst paid out in settlement.
http://artbutnobecause.wordpress.com
Hmmm...
[info]eyechild wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 01:51 am (UTC)
They do seem to have suddenly pulled the entire project over at the website though, with some suddenly conciliatory language...

"We would like to point out however, that although this appeal was focused on the Hirst vs Cartrain episode, it was intended to be a creative excerise that mocked and exposed the idiocy an overbearing and thoughtless approach to copyright control that creates fear and censorship in the arts. It was and is not a critical crusade against Damien Hirst as an artist or the nature and degree of his success. Thanks to all of you who sent in artworks with more fevered opinions about this, but for the sake of clarity we will save them for another occasion."

Wonder what happened there then?

Seriously!
[info]rocthemoc wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 01:07 am (UTC)
plagiarism from plagiarism.


Damien Hack


Most popular