Blood on Paper: the Art of the Book, V&A, London
When words and images slug it out, the best result is a draw
Sunday 04 May 2008
Latest in Reviews
On Facebook
Arts & Ents blogs
Futures: Teen angst, Jack Kerouac and the festival season
Rising from the ashes of 'Tonight is Goodbye', Futures are spearheading the up-and-coming movement o...
Too few kids are getting cultural experiences
So half of all parents believe that it isn’t their job to teach their children about history and cul...
Interview with ‘Being Human’ creator Toby Whithouse
The writer behind BBC3’s supernatural comedy-drama ‘Being Human’ speaks to Neela Debnath about serie...
In 1975, Tom Wolfe published an essay called The Painted Word in which he argued that art theorising had taken over from art-making as the visual pursuit of our day. Where theorists once applied themselves to artworks, the reverse was now true. In a time when art schools are departments of universities and award degrees like any other discipline, artists start with a Big Idea and work backwards. Their art is shaped – the material in which they shape it is immaterial – to fit their concept.
So the underlying premise of the V&A's show Blood on Paper is more complex than it sounds. Artists have worked on (and with and from) books for ever, but the battle between word and image has never been pitched as now. In the 19th century, the big threat to image-making was the photograph. Since the mid-20th century, it has been the word. This means the 60 art books in Blood on Paper are not the simple homage of one creative form to another you might have thought. All kinds of struggles are going on in the V&A's show, between seeing and reading, intuiting and understanding, between literature and art.
At the traditional end of the scale are the livres d'artistes of painters including Picasso and Matisse. Works such as Matisse's Swimmer in a Tank, from his 1947 artist's book Jazz, are, in effect, fine prints that happen to be fine-bound. This certainly allows for a different use from traditional prints – like travelling altarpieces, livres d'artistes make art portable – but cannot be said to engage with the book-ness of books in the way that, say, Ed Ruscha's Twentysix Gasoline Stations does.
Published in 1962, Ruscha's mini-masterpiece is just what it says: a series of photographs of American petrol stations, sold at supermarket checkouts at a dollar a time. This, intentionally, pitched Twentysix Gasoline Stations mid-way between Matisse and the National Enquirer. Art (and, by extraction, artists' books) are elitist; supermarket paperbacks are not. But what of a work that combines all of these things?
Thirty years later, Jeff Koons raises the same question in his Jeff Koons Handbook. You might see Koons's book as the central text to this show, an artist writing a guide to his own work hinting at variously subversive things about contemporary art. Word-based artists such as Fiona Banner agonise over the battle between the visual and the literary by painting words on canvas. Koons, as ever, goes one better by telling the viewer what to think outright. If Ruscha's photo-book is a penny dreadful, Koons's handbook is a self-help guide. Give readers the theoretical background to your art, and its mysteries will be revealed – a piece of faux-disingenuousness that suggests the relative importance of theory and making in our day.
It sounds carping to say that Blood on Paper could have done with tighter curating, that more might have been made of context. Sol LeWitt's take on Borges's Ficciones, say, is more interesting if you see LeWitt as a patriarch of the word-art crossover. Forty years ago, the American started getting gallery assistants to make his murals for him, issuing them with instructions – "A line not straight corner to corner" – jotted down on scraps of paper. It marked an epochal shift in modern art, the moment when words won out over images. As LeWitt chillingly put it, "The execution [of an artwork] is a perfunctory affair. The idea is the machine that makes the art."
Seen in this way, the mooted death of the book at the hands of computers might be expected to fill artists with glee, and Charles Sandison's Carmina Figurata does feel quietly gleeful. A flickering dado of Powerpoint words, the work takes its title from concrete poetry – one of those rare moments where images shape literature rather than the other way round. Freed from bindings and covers, Sandison's "book" changes shape and meaning with equal alacrity. It suggests a time when words and images may be friends again, when neither will threaten the other.
Victoria and Albert Museum, London SW7 (020-7942 2000) to 29 June
- 1 BANNED: The most controversial films
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Dolly Parton to make millions from Whitney Houston effect
- 4 Rich art collectors 'know the price of everything – and the value of nothing'
- 5 Mad, bad and delightful to know: How Lord Byron became a cultural superstar
- 6 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 7 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments