Arts: Dance: More means a great deal less for swans in a flap
SWAN LAKE ROYAL ALBERT HALL LONDON
Monday 21 June 1999
Actually, this business of size is a fallacy. To have 61 swans on stage at once seems to me too much; they look better in the passages where there are fewer of them, spread out in more legible patterns. And although it is an ingenious idea to quadruple the showpiece pas de trois, dancing out in four directions from a central point so that everyone in the audience, spread all around the stage, gets a head-on view, it does look a little odd. It would help if the four male soloists could keep in time with each other and the music. Surely this could have been put right during the five-week Far Eastern tour already undertaken?
Don't get me wrong. Everyone chops and changes Swan Lake nowadays and I have almost given up hope of ever again seeing a good, straightforward production that truly preserves the best of the original. Deane's amendments are no worse, no better than most, only bigger.
This is, after all, supposed to be a love story; the two principals count for a lot more than a large corps de ballet and sprawling ensemble dances. And that's the problem about doing Swan Lake in the Albert Hall and other big halls; the story gets lost among the crowds and the vast distances. And that is quite apart from the distraction created in this performance by the dancers making all their entrances and exits up and down the steep steps that run through the audience.
On opening night even Thomas Edur could not really make anything of the hero, Siegfried. Yes, he looks extremely handsome, dances admirably, and conscientiously paces round trying his best to look involved, but it is all vague and unfocused.
As for Margaret Illmann's Odette-Odile, I wonder what came over her. I've seen her look much better elsewhere in other ballets. With her arms flapping constantly up and down, her dancing was both flamboyant and at times insecure. To say that it was also inexpressive might be unfair. She showed two expressions; open-mouthed and miserable as the Swan Queen, and then open-mouthed and smiling as her wicked double in the middle act.
The cast changes at every performance, so you might strike lucky another night. What isn't likely to improve much is the orchestra, which is stolid and scratchy. Their positioning up above the stage doesn't help the acoustic.
Till 26 June, 0171-589 8212
There’s revolution in the air, but one lady’s not for turningTV
Robin Thicke admits he didn't write 'Blurred Lines'music
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Rihanna 'nude photos' claims emerge on 4Chan as hacking scandal continues
- 2 Frank Lampard equalises for Manchester City against Chelsea: how Twitter reacted
- 3 Stamford Hill council removes 'unacceptable' posters telling women which side of the road to walk down
- 4 Kim Kardashian 'nude photos' leaked on 4chan weeks after Jennifer Lawrence scandal
- 5 Hitler’s former food taster reveals the horrors of the Wolf’s Lair
Downton Abbey series 5, episode 1, review: Revolution still seems far off
The Beatles biographer reveals exclusive original manuscripts of some of the best pop songs ever written
Friends 20th anniversary: The highs and lows of the cast's careers since TV series ended in 2004
Downton Abbey series 5, episode 1, ITV, review: There’s revolution in the air, but one lady’s not for turning
Friends 20th anniversary: Six things we wouldn't have without influential comedy series
Scottish independence referendum: A nation divided against itself
Scottish referendum results: Cross-party consensus collapses amid Tory-Labour spat on the 'English question'
Scottish independence: David Cameron is becoming the 'George Bush of Britain'
Hilary Mantel 'should be investigated by police' over Margaret Thatcher assassination story, says Lord Bell
Plebgate MP Andrew Mitchell called officer a 'little s**t', claim court documents 'exposing ex-Chief Whip's 'record of abusing police'
Archbishop of Canterbury admits doubts about existence of God