A fatwa from the chair
A w e e k I N B O O K S
Prolific writer and commentator John Walsh contributes columns to the paper as well as writing features, interviews and restaurant reviews. He has been editor of The Independent Magazine, literary editor of the Sunday Times and features editor of the London Evening Standard.
Saturday 11 March 1995
The £25,000 AT&T Non-Fiction Award is the country's most valuable book prize. It used to be sponsored by NCR, the computer company, and its winners (such as Simon Schama's Citizens and Jung Chang's Wild Swans) tended to be incontrovertibly fine works - serious but with popular appeal. This year's panel, chaired by Alan Clark, announced on Monday their "long list" of 12 titles from the total 115 submitted: the lucky dozen included biographies of Leonard Bernstein and Louis MacNeice, and Nelson Mandela's A Long Walk to Freedom.
It was, however, the books left off the list that caused the judges a certain amount of heartburn. The rules stipulate that, to qualify, books must not be "merely" diaries or letters or collections of journalism. As more than one of the judges pointed out, this excluded Alan Bennett's Writing Home and Kenneth Tynan's Collected Letters, incontestably a pair of diamond earrings in the jewel box of British "non-fiction". Rather more sneaky was the exclusion of The End of Innocence: Britain in the Time of Aids by the Independent journalist Simon Garfield. It was argued by the chairman Alan Clark that the book was no more than a series of Garfield's disparate newspaper articles bolted together and thus not appropriate as a contender. When his co-judges protested (Garfield's book is a written-through analysis, based on original research), Clark changed tack. "Why do we need another book," he demanded, "on a disease which is basically self-inflicted?" True, Mr Clark did not try to disqualify the work - as was his chairmanly right - but by the time it narrowly failed to get through on a second ballot, it was unclear whether the "inappropriate" label had stuck.
It is obvious that book prizes require rules, otherwise judges would find themselves considering recipe books and car manuals along with the biographies and social history. But perhaps a greater flexibility about the creative aspect of letters and journals would be "appropriate" - as would the choice of a chairman who did not let personal prejudices cloud his judgement.
Review: A panoramic account of the hacking scandalbooks
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Russell Brand accuses FOX News anchor Sean Hannity of terrorism after aggressive Israel-Gaza debate
- 2 Pope Francis issues top 10 tips for happiness – including don’t try to convert other people
- 3 Arturo Vidal to Manchester United: Midfielder set to force through move to Louis van Gaal's Red Devils - reports
- 4 Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
- 5 Israel's propaganda machine is finally starting to misfire
The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
Land for gas: Merkel and Putin discussed secret deal could end Ukraine crisis
Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
Richard Dawkins tweets: 'Date rape is bad, stranger rape is worse'
Putin is 'thuggish, dishonest and reckless', says British ambassador to US
Boozy, ignorant, intolerant, but very polite – Britain as others see us
- < Previous
- Next >