Classic Thoughts: A genius and a bore: Jan Morris considers her own uncertain and double-edged relationship with James Joyce's Ulysses
Saturday 31 July 1993
Scholars, of course, constantly analyse it. Students are obliged to study bits of it. But I long ago learnt to disbelieve people who say they have read every word of it with pleasure, with sufficient understanding, and without a crib. Unless they happen to be Anthony Burgesses, they are almost certainly lying.
Virginia Woolf turned down Ulysses for the Hogarth Press - she recognised its genius, but thought '300 pages of it might be boring'. And that indeed is the trouble. After 40-odd years of trying I was converted to the magic of Ulysses by the use of Harry Blamires' splendid commentary The New Bloomsday Book, but even such a cicerone could not dissuade me from the opinion that a large part of the masterpiece is a bore.
Of course the language is infinitely fascinating and often very beautiful. Unfortunately much of it is more or less incomprehensible. It might be argued that the music of Stravinsky, say, seemed equally obscure when it was first heard: but while we long ago learned to understand the disharmonies of The Rite of Spring, Ulysses is no more accessible today than it was in 1918 - and moreover, has had remarkably little influence, so far as I can see, upon literature in English as a whole.
Then its allusions and references strike me all too often as wilfully difficult - sometimes so recondite that one suspects Joyce was deliberately setting out to epater les professeurs. In particular, the whole business of the correspondence between this book and its Homeric originals seems to me an irrelevant nuisance, impossible to follow without a guide and adding nothing to the impact of the work.
I have learnt to be ruthlessly selective with Ulysses. There is so much delight in this tremendous novel, so much warmth, poetry and pathos, that failure to read it is a genuine literary deprival. I have been blessing Mr Blamires for years, and with his unwitting help (he would violently disapprove) I have learnt to skip my way shamelessly through its chapters indulging myself in the parts I like.
Not long ago, in my Philistine way, I suggested to one of the most enlightened publishers in London that he put out an edition of Ulysses containing only those sections that nobody but a dolt could fail to enjoy. He thought not, and I did not have the nerve to ask him if he had ever read the book right through . . .
Review: A panoramic account of the hacking scandalbooks
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Israel-Gaza conflict: 'When Genocide is Permissible' article removed from The Times of Israel website
- 2 Pope Francis issues top 10 tips for happiness
- 3 Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
- 4 The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
- 5 Israel's propaganda machine is finally starting to misfire
New Netflix releases: Films and TV shows coming in August 2014
The Walking Dead season 5 will see deaths of 'favourite characters', suggests Andrew Lincoln
Best movies on Netflix UK and US: 32 films that will end your endless scrolling
Coolio has sold his soul to Pornhub
50 best running songs: From Avicii and Pharrell Williams to the classic 'Eye of the Tiger'
Land for gas: Merkel and Putin discussed secret deal could end Ukraine crisis
Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
Richard Dawkins tweets: 'Date rape is bad, stranger rape is worse'
Putin is 'thuggish, dishonest and reckless', says British ambassador to US
Boozy, ignorant, intolerant, but very polite – Britain as others see us
A new Russian revolution: The cracks are starting to appear in Putin’s Kremlin power bloc
- < Previous
- Next >