Investment in Blood: New book claims that Afghan war has cost UK families £2,000 each
Heather Saul is a digital reporter for The Independent, currently working on the People desk. She has written news and features across a number of topics, paying particular attention to the activities of Isis and events in Iraq, Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Thursday 30 May 2013
A new book released today argues that every family in the UK will have paid £2,000 towards the conflict in Afghanistan, in a war that will cost the nation up to £40 billion by 2020.
Frank Ledwidge, the author of Investment in Blood analyses both the financial and human cost of Britain's involvement in the war. In his book, the former civilian advisor to the British government in Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan states that it has cost the UK at least £15m a day to keep soldiers in the Helmand province since 2006.
He also discusses the human cost of the war and highlights the 2,600 wounded, 5,000 “psychologically injured” and 444 British troops dead.
The total amount spent on the war by 2020 could have paid for the wages of 5,000 police officers and nurses he alleges, or funded free tuition for all students in British higher education for the next ten years.
Al-Qaeda should have never been dealt with primarily as a military response, he argues, and should have instead been considered an intelligence problem.
Investment in Blood, which will be published by Yale University Press next week, highlights that whilst billions of tax payer pounds have been funnelled into the operation in Afghanistan, not “a single al-Qaeda operative or 'international terrorist' who could conceivably have threatened the United Kingdom is recorded as having been killed by Nato forces in Helmand.”
Speaking to The Guardian, Ledwidge said: “Once the last British helicopter leaves a deserted and wrecked Camp Bastion, Helmand - to which Britain claimed it would bring 'good governance' - will be a fractious narco-state occasionally fought over by opium barons and their cronies.
“There are no new lessons here, only one rather important old precept: before you engage in a war, understand the environment you are going into, precisely and realistically what it is you are trying to achieve and will it be worth the cost? In other words have a strategy.”
TVJamie's Sugar Rush reveal's campaigning chef's new foe
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 What marriage would look like if we actually followed the Bible
- 2 If these extraordinarily powerful images of a dead Syrian child washed up on a beach don't change Europe's attitude to refugees, what will?
- 3 The Chinese city where men have 'three girlfriends because there are so many women'
- 4 'Heartbreaking' Syria orphan photo wasn't taken in Syria and not of orphan
- 5 Orthorexia nervosa: How becoming obsessed with healthy eating can lead to malnutrition
Britain to take more refugees as Cameron bows to pressure after more than 250,000 back our campaign
Senior British politicians tell David Cameron: When dead children are being washed up on beaches – it's time to act
Jeremy Corbyn calls Osama bin Laden's killing a 'tragedy' - but was it taken out of context?
If these extraordinarily powerful images of a dead Syrian child washed up on a beach don't change Europe's attitude to refugees, what will?
If you're not already angry about the refugee crisis, here's a history lesson to remind you why you really should be
Make your voice heard: Sign The Independent's petition to welcome refugees