Books

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Women authors left off list of the year's top 10 books

Female writers won several major awards this year – including the Man Booker Prize – but the industry magazine doesn't include a single one in its round-up

By Susie Mesure

Lionel Shriver said the selection was further evidence of the 'weirdly retrograde sexual sensibility' that dominated publishing

jason alden

Lionel Shriver said the selection was further evidence of the 'weirdly retrograde sexual sensibility' that dominated publishing

The publishing world has been plunged into a new row over sexism after the authoritative Publishers Weekly omitted to include a single female author in its list of the year's top 10 titles.

Leading British women writers rounded on the respected industry magazine yesterday after its pick of 2009's must-read books failed to nominate some of the year's biggest literary successes, such as Hilary Mantel, whose Wolf Hall won the Man Booker Prize, or Alice Munro, who won its international equivalent.

Lionel Shriver, the prize-winning author of We Need to Talk About Kevin, said the selection was further evidence of the "weirdly retrograde sexual sensibility" that dominated publishing. "Every time a list like this comes out it just helps to propagate the same attitudes." Shriver said. "Publishing takes men more seriously than women. Female writing is regarded as second tier; there is a default assumption that men are the heavy hitters."

An all-male Booker Prize shortlist in 1991 sparked so much outrage that a women-only award, the Orange Prize for Fiction, soon followed.

Publishers Weekly's choice spanned different literary genres and the globe, with non-fiction works such as Blake Bailey's biography of John Cheever and Richard Holmes's The Age of Wonder rubbing shoulders with Geoff Dyer's Jeff in Venice, Death in Varanasi and Dan Chaon's Await Your Reply. Louisa Ermelino, the novelist, journalist and the magazine's reviews director, said it had "disturbed us" that its list was all male, but insisted: "We ignored gender and genre and who had the buzz. We gave fair chance to the 'big' books of the year, but made them stand on their own two feet."

But authors were dismayed that Mantel had failed to make the grade. Helen Dunmore, whose A Spell of Winter won the inaugural Orange Prize in 1996, said: "It does seem strange that it wouldn't include Wolf Hall, one of Mantel's finest books, and a hugely enjoyable one."

Claire Tomalin, the biographer, who is married to the novelist Michael Frayn, said: "It sounds like an eccentric list and it is a bit odd to exclude Hilary Mantel. In my pantheon, there are lots of very good female writers."

The novelist Kathy Lette added: "Apparently dinosaurs still roam the earth. They're all at Publishers Weekly. This list proves that the only support women authors get is from our Wonderbras. As women make up 90 per cent of the fiction-buying public, perhaps we should make a point and girl-cott male authors until our work is given the same critical acclaim and public backing."

Other big awards won by women this year include The Los Angeles Times book prize, which went to Marilynne Robinson, and the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, won by Elizabeth Strout.

'It does seem strange not to include Wolf Hall, one of Mantel's finest books, and a hugely enjoyable one'

Helen Dunmore

'Apparently, dinosaurs still roam the earth. They're all at Publishers Weekly'

Kathy Lette

'Publishing takes men more seriously than women. Female writing is regarded as second tier'

Lionel Shriver

'In my pantheon, there are lots of very good female writers'

Claire Tomalin

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Smaller Brains
[info]karishmatishash wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 05:50 am (UTC)
Women have smaller brains, when we read too much it overheats. It is time we girls all realized that to read too much gives us strange ideas such as voting rights, running businesses and most preposterous of all pursuing academics or writing award winning literature. We should all know better and stick to Mills and Boon, leave the heavy work of deep meaningful thinking to men.

Ah men! Superior of all beings, master of the Universe, you are behind such great achievements of civilization. Single handedly bringing mother nature to her knees with the threats of global warming. Mother nature rebels against you and chances are will loose, so who are we, mere flesh and blood entities of the female sex to throw tantrums because you still live in highschool land where the clicks are a group of people who still believe that Austen, Eliot, Bronte, Lessing or Desi are just a bunch of silly floozies. We will be right behind you as always, while you lead this planet into an early and sudden death. After all we are just a bunch of baby-making domestic animals, while you are glorious as you repeatedly wage war over power, oil or money, all the while blaming it on poor old Helen. Its surprising that women authors have come as far as they have, must be an oestrogen high giving them delusions of grandeur.
Re: Smaller Brains
[info]xeroflight wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 11:54 pm (UTC)
That's quite a post, lots of issues there to be unearthed... Slightly unfair to blame the totality of the destruction of the earth on men don't you think? You seem to be ironically critiquing your own position in your post.
no women in top ten.
[info]noalot wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 06:32 am (UTC)
I don't know why but I just can't read a book written by a women.There is no logical reason for it , but I would rather read a book written by a man.
Here we go again
[info]chippychap wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 08:38 am (UTC)
Look, books are asexual objects, perhaps the top ten were written by blokes. GET OVER IT GIRLS
Crime writers
[info]oomigoolies wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 08:53 am (UTC)
Crime - a fine writing genre. And with James, Rendell, Cornwell, Sayers, and many others, one that is supported almost entirely in terms of excellent writing by women.
ffs
[info]laconico wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:25 am (UTC)
isn't the point whether the books are any good? Anyone who cares if men or women wrote them is missing this at some level. I bet there is no Isaac Bashevis Singer or Angela Carter on the list anyway. Probably just the usual groucho monkey head-up-their-arse socialites
[info]bobbobbobbfry wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 10:43 am (UTC)
This is rather amusing, i hate racism/sexism heck, i hate all forms of discrimination... but surely sometimes people like to see these things where they do not actually exist. I am by no means a book expert and i highly doubt i speak for everyone, but could it just be possible that the 10 best books this year are just that: The TEN BEST BOOKS?
[info]1maia wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 02:59 pm (UTC)
agree - how they think those are the ten best books in the world this year is a much bigger question. i mean, wolf hall is a good book, with all the plot spoiler problems that come from having done lots of tudor history. and it's not like nobody in non-english speaking countries has written anything worth reading. If we're going to have minority representation, it should be for real underrepresented people to whom it would make a difference, like a spot for the homeless, or under 18s in care, or disabled people, or refugees, or people who are british but whose native language is sign language or deaf-blind signing so cannot really grasp english very well (like chinese writing, without the symbolic element, if you think about it, for them) and could be translated...that would be interesting. I'm sure they could tell us things nobody else could. the only interesting thing is how, in victorian times, women were the majority of authors and they aren't now - it was the female artform. Perhaps all the artily inclined are now drawing male nudes and acting without becoming prostitutes now that they can.
Double bind
[info]xeroflight wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 11:46 pm (UTC)
A women gets selected for a prize: she's condecended, she doesn't: she's descriminated against.
We need to get a grip on what a quality novel is not which gender wrote it. Schriver's books are overrated in my opinion anyway...
do grow up
[info]2heads_2xstupid wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 11:53 am (UTC)
As 'laconico' says below, is the world going to be a worse place for the absence of Daphnes, Gemimas and Tinkerbells that frequent Groucho's being absent from the list? Oh but maybe it is. After all, they might - from the safe haven of their Hampstead homes - save the planet from the belicose, mysogynistic bearded heathens that are thundering us poor innocents towards the Great Black Hole.
Maybe the ones written by women weren't as good.
[info]lucid1984 wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 12:54 pm (UTC)
I'm a woman and this sort of behaviour really annoys me. Perhaps Lionel should try writing a better book in future instead of automatically assuming that due to some sort of unwritten diversity rule she'd be included. If you're not good enough, you're not good enough. Now stop making the rest of us look like a bunch of whiners who can't take the heat.

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date