We-Think, By Charles Leadbetter
We-Think belongs to the genre of futurology, its thesis being that the web will radically alter the way we think. Instead of conceiving of ourselves as independent "I"-machines, in some areas we are seeing ourselves as part of a greater "We", as exemplified by Wikipedia. According to Leadbetter, this shared thinking could be a huge force for change – in innovation, employment and advancing equality and freedom.
There is thoughtful consideration of the dangers, too (such as herd-thinking), and reasoned optimism that their effects can be countered. Leadbetter uses the full scholarly apparatus – references, footnotes and a 16-page bibliography – to argue the case. But my reservation is that We-Think is not a good ad for the cause it promotes. Large chunks were posted online in draft form, and the published version is the result of input from the We-Thinking public. Yet the prose is pedestrian, and not nearly exciting enough for the ideas it advances.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies