Films

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 16°C / Lo 8°C

Scientologists wanted me out, claims journalist sacked by Fox

Travolta and Cruise deny pushing for the dismissal of entertainment reporter

By Guy Adams in Los Angeles

Roger Friedman is a longstanding critic of the Church of Scientology; right, Tom Cruise

GETTY

Roger Friedman is a longstanding critic of the Church of Scientology; right, Tom Cruise

In a conspiracy as contorted as the plot of one of their action movies, Tom Cruise and John Travolta have been accused of persuading Rupert Murdoch's Fox News to sack an influential entertainment journalist who had a history of criticising the Church of Scientology.

Roger Friedman, who was dismissed in April after a decade covering the TV channel's Hollywood beat, announced yesterday that he intended to sue his former employer for wrongful termination, claiming that they fired him so that Cruise and Travolta would sign on to future Fox movie projects.

The lawsuit, which Friedman bullishly described as a "slam-dunk," promises to shed light on the close ties between powerful Scientologists and film studios that rely on their co-operation to get expensive movies off the ground. It is due to be filed in Manhattan later this week.

Cruise and Travolta have formally denied any connection to the sacking and Fox insists that the journalist was dismissed for writing a column on his "411" blog which encouraged readers to download an illegally pirated version of the 20th Century Fox blockbuster X-Men Origins: Wolverine.

In an interview with the New York Daily News, Friedman, who was a regular talking head on Fox News and wrote a blog on its website that was read by more than 50 million people, claimed that the official grounds were an elaborate cover story.

Though he was formally given the heave-ho for "promoting piracy" the journalist claims he was actually sacked to help Fox build stronger links with the Church of Scientology, of whom he had been a longstanding critic.

At the time of Friedman's dismissal, Fox was involved in protracted (and subsequently successful) negotiations to hire Cruise to appear in the forthcoming romantic comedy Wichita, alongside Cameron Diaz.

Friedman, now at The Hollywood Reporter, also claimed that Travolta's wife, Kelly Preston, had earlier attempted to get him fired last August after they became involved in a heated argument at the funeral of a mutual friend, the late actor and soul singer Isaac Hayes. After bumping into Preston (who, like Hayes and her husband, is a fervent Scientologist) Friedman said he was loudly berated for criticising Scientology in his column. "She called me a religious bigot," Friedman says.

Later, Friedman alleges, Preston orchestrated a meeting between senior Fox executives Roger Ailes and John Moody and the communications department of the Church of Scientology in an effort to have his longstanding criticisms of the church and its most prominent members reined in.

Though Friedman has yet to produce any factual evidence beyond his own recollection to back up his version of his sacking in April, he does appear to have been hard done by. The column for which he was sacked was read and approved by at least four of his superiors.

"It's outrageous that Rupert Murdoch made a decision to fire Roger after four of Roger's editors and superiors reviewed his column and found it very good," said Friedman's attorney, Martin Garbus.

"In falsely claiming Roger engaged in piracy, they attempted to destroy the reputation of a fine journalist. I've seen how Scientology intimidates even the most powerful media. That seems to be what happened here."

Asked about the specifics of Friedman's allegations, Fox News declined to comment, while an attorney for Cruise said it was "utterly false" that the actor had sought his dismissal.

Preston's lawyer, Martin Singer, said that Friedman's claim was "absurd and ridiculous".

"He was terminated just days after [his Wolverine column]. It is outrageous to try to blame my client ... on the basis of something that supposedly took place eight months earlier."

Friedman on Scientology: 'Believing in this means believing in aliens'

* "One possible theory for why the careers of Scientologists tend to go south is that the famous actors, such as Jenna Elfman or Juliette Lewis, 'get so involved in thinking only they can save the world' that the sect overwhelms them ... John Travolta has headlined a series of flops."

* "[Tom Cruise] is so consumed by Scientology at this point that he seems to have no awareness of the ridicule he's subject to ... Cruise is totally subsumed into the Hubbard world."

* "To believe in this religion means also subscribing to a belief in aliens, for one thing. And by aliens I mean creatures from other planets and galaxies ... [Looking at] the history of Scientology inventor L Ron Hubbard, one can only conclude that Cruise and Travolta share these same ideals."

* "Katie Holmes' parents must be beside themselves since their daughter joined the group."

* "Scientology is notable for recruiting stars at low points in their careers or personal lives, preying on uncertainty, instability or just plain fear by promising to fix life issues."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

"She called me a religious bigot,"
[info]nutleyboy wrote:
Monday, 15 June 2009 at 11:14 pm (UTC)
Well how can that ring true? Scientology is not a religion.

We all know Tom Cruise carrier has been master minded by Scientology.
Re: "She called me a religious bigot,"
[info]drmagyar wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 11:49 am (UTC)
Unfortunately in the US it is classified as a tax-exempt religion. It is about time that Scientology is shown up as the litigious pyramid scheme that it is and loses tax-exemption and is even outlawed, as has happened is several European countries.


Intimidating tactics
[info]ibusa wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 12:44 am (UTC)
When I was 18 and looking for work, I passed the Tottenham Court Road office, which claimed to have vacancies.

I had no idea what I was getting into. I was there for an hour and a half, whilst they showed me videos and asked me to signed documents that committed me to five years' employment with them. They never discussed the salary.

I think more people should be warned about the tactics that are used to draw people in, particularly for "personality tests".

Had I known who they really were, I would certainly have walked passed.
"She called me a religious bigot"
[info]had_it wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 01:55 am (UTC)
Well, yes....but only because it was true: he is a religious bigot.

Let us imagine what would have happened if he said the same things about Judaism that he said about Sceintology.
Or about Jesus (Hey, everybody bashes christianity with impunity, but woe to the those in America who dare to criticise Jesus.)
Or about Muhammad: he wouldn't just have been fired, he would have price on his head
Re: "She called me a religious bigot"
[info]jazzwhistle wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 06:54 am (UTC)
How can anyone seriously compare the teachings of Jesus & Muhammed with thoses of a 1950's science fiction author who openly claimed that the fastest way to become a millionaire is to start a religion?!
Re: She called me a religious bigot
[info]had_it wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 10:46 am (UTC)
Or Joe Smith and the Angel Moroni?

And, other than antiquity, the difference is...?
Re: She called me a religious bigot
[info]jazzwhistle wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 01:06 pm (UTC)
How about the fact that neither Jesus nor Muhammed had amassed a $600 million fortune by the time they died? Or that neither were banned from entering the UK? Or that neither have ever been convicted by a court of making fraudulent promises?

It's all very well claiming that everyone has the right to their beliefs, but the line between a religion and a sect is really not that difficult to understand.
Re: "She called me a religious bigot"
[info]mr_scummy wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 07:03 am (UTC)
Don't be silly. Scientology is clearly not a religion - it's a cult created by a deluded (and bad) science-fiction writer in order to make a lot of money from gullible followers, some of whom will do almost anything to appease their god/leader.

Whereas "real" religions are, er, um, not all that different really.

I'll get my coat...


Scientology - the SCAM of the century?
[info]colin_brown wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 08:29 am (UTC)
Six of one
[info]flibberdy wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 08:39 am (UTC)
There's something unfairly funny about a nasty, narrow-minded, unpleasant organisation that is built on fantasy and misinformation allegedly pushing a FOX journalist out of his job.
Re: Six of one
[info]had_it wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 10:56 am (UTC)
Yeah, the Inquisition did a fair job of that and I am told that the christian church still leans on the odd inconoclast. Some deranged Muslims did a good job on Salmon Rushdie, not to mention Theo Van Gogh. And it was suppressing a journalist that got Mormon founder Joe Smith killed in 1844.

Even if Friedman is not a self-serving little git trying to work his ticket, even if his accusations are even mildly true, it would seem the Hubbardettes are in good company.
Re: Six of one
[info]paul999 wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 11:30 am (UTC)
Nasty, narrow minded, unpleasant = FOX
2009 nation-wide lawsuit in France
[info]mirabelles wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 08:47 am (UTC)
According to Le Figaro, Three weeks of lawsuit have not been enough to give limpid accounts of the organization, and now the public prosecutor has requested to dismantle the two main structures of the "Spiritual Association of Scientology" and its bookshop, for fraud and swindle in organized band, plus 2 million euro and 150 thousand euro as fines. And a few jail sentences.
Source:
http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2009/06/15/01016-20090615ARTFIG00547-scientologie-la-dissolution-requise-.php

Re: 2009 nation-wide lawsuit in France
[info]had_it wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 10:58 am (UTC)
Watch out Mormons, you are next.
Sly Fox
[info]charlatan_1 wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 10:59 am (UTC)
"There's something unfairly funny about a nasty, narrow-minded, unpleasant organisation that is built on fantasy and misinformation allegedly pushing a FOX journalist out of his job. "

- best comment so far, I doff my cap to Six of One

Be very careful Independent
[info]rants_a_lot wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC)
I was surprised that comments are even allowed on this subject, given the Scientology way of coming after anyone who dares to speak out against them.

Scientology is not a religion it is a cult designed to extract money from the gullible and Tom Cruise is an insane midget.
shecalled me a religious bigot
[info]jamesromero85 wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 11:32 am (UTC)
The only differnece between scientology and everyother religion is its age. they are all just as made up as each other. its just the proper religions have 1000s of years of buried evidence and mysticism which covers up there hypocracy and complete lack of evidence
Re: shecalled me a religious bigot
[info]drmagyar wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 11:58 am (UTC)
I agree all religions are at best silly and at worst dangerous for your health.

The big difference with Scientology seems to be that they have claimed that making money is part of their faith so that they can get tax exemption on raking in the money. Which other religion guards the secrets of the religion using copyright law rather than publishing them freely and widely.

It is all crazy and I can't believe that in these times it is allowed to go on. It seems that only a few countries such as France, and Germany have any sense and have banned them.
Re: shecalled me a religious bigot
[info]raymondode wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 12:28 pm (UTC)
You are correct that the difference is age but I think you need to give this difference a bit more context. The early religions explained a lot of things that we didn't understand. Creation, the different physical nature of people around the world, different languages. Sure the explainations were nonsense but they were answers people wanted and needed. We are now aware (or partially aware) of these answers but the old religions are maintained because people like traditions and take comfort in them. I am an atheist but I don't have a problem with this.
Scientology provides neither answers or comfort but you have to give them credit. A marketing triumph as they were one of the first companies to pursue celebrity endorsements so aggressively and seemed to anticipate in the eighties the essential deification of celebrities in the nineties and noughties.
You're all feeding the beast
[info]greecian2000 wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 11:50 am (UTC)
More importantly who cares? Believe if you want to, dont if you dont. Discussing the issue merely gives purpose to both groups.
Anyone notice??
[info]citystoic wrote:
Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 02:37 pm (UTC)
I find the most shocking thing is that The Independant have a Scientology Recruitment page as a Sponsored link on EVERY page, including the homepage... Did anyone else notice?

I would love to know how they choose their sponsors. The Independant has always been viewed by me as not prescribing to the usual advertising tat that you find in tabloids, but haveing that link on every page is just strange, and quite disturbing to me.

Surely their influence has not reached this far?
Want to expose the healing and medical scams of Scientology?
[info]hunter6666 wrote:
Sunday, 28 June 2009 at 12:23 pm (UTC)
The fact that Scientology is a cult has been loudly stated by each and every Ex-Scientologists in the World.
Sooner or later they get wise and have to break away, I broke away because they almost killed me with their medical claims that all illnesses are due to only one cause--a PTS condition. It means they claimed my Mother was an SP and refused to let me get medical help for my symptoms --which were Hep-C.
This happens to the ones who get sick, many others leave because of the abuse received by the staff, etc.
The only ones that can know the truth- are the ones that were in the cult and had enough. The RONBOT cult staff threaten you, bride you or give you free courses when you hurt, damage or sue other Scientologists that want to break away. The ones that refuse to hurt others are put on the conditions formula and graded as PTS.
So, if you want to know the truth ask any ex-scientologist brave enough to break away.
THE RONBOT HUNTER.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date