Law Report: No sex bias in Sunday trading ban: Chisholm and others v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council. Kirklees MBC v B & Q plc. Chancery Division (Mr Justice Ferris), 26 May 1993
Mr Justice Ferris granted applications by Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council and the Attorney General, to strike out, as disclosing no cause of action, an claim by Mandy Chisholm, Annette Layden, Ann Tuck and Francesca West, four employees of B & Q plc at its Dewsbury store who worked on Sundays only, who had sought a declaration that the Sunday trading provisions of the Shops Act 1950 were unlawful and unreasonable as a matter of European Community law, and an injunction to restrain Kirklees from enforcing them.
His Lordship also granted an application by Kirklees for an interlocutory injunction to restrain B & Q from opening the Dewsbury store on Sundays except as permitted by the Act.
Stuart Isaacs QC, Neil Calver and Clive Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard, for the Borough Solicitor) for Kirklees; Genevra Caws QC and Nicholas Paines (Treasury Solicitor) for the Attorney General; Gerald Barling QC and David Anderson (Hepherd Winstanley & Pugh, Southampton) for the employees; David Vaughan QC and Nicholas Davidson (Hepherd Winstanley & Pugh) for B & Q.
MR JUSTICE FERRIS said that under section 47 of the 1950 Act, shops had to remain closed on Sundays, except for the purpose of transactions mentioned in Schedule 5. The list of permitted transactions was notoriously anomalous. Parliamentary action was long overdue but in the meantime the court's duty was to apply the law as it existed.
It was argued by the four employees in their action, and by B &Q in its defence, that women substantially outnumbered men among those who were able to be, and were in fact, employed in retail outlets on Sundays, and that if an outlet was required to shut on Sundays, many more women than men would be deprived of employment.
The enforcement of s 47 of the Shops Act was therefore said to be in contravention of EC Council Directive 76/207 (the Equal Treatment Directive), in that it was liable to have the effect of introducing a condition or selection criterion for jobs at the store that was indirectly discriminatory on grounds of sex. Moreover, such discrimination was not objectively justifiable on grounds unconnected with sex and was disproportionate. It was also said to be contrary to s 6 of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.
In his Lordship's judgment, however, to argue that the disparity which the enforcement of section 47 would have, as between men and women, amounted to discrimination within the Directive was to equate two fundamentally different things.
Moreover, the effect of section 47 in prohibiting the employment of staff on Sunday was not a requirement that staff be dismissed or subjected to some other detriment, within the meaning of section 6. Section 47 of the 1950 Act was not a new provision which, for the first time, made unlawful something which had previously been lawful. The provision had been law since 1936. Its clear impact was to make unlawful from the outset the Sunday opening of the Dewsbury store which began in 1986 and had, with comparatively short interruptions, continued ever since. Its practical effect in relation to employment had not been to require dismissals or to subject of employees to detriment, but to prohibit B &Q from lawfully offering job opportunities on Sundays.
In his Lordship's judgment, B &Q was in clear breach of a valid and enforceable law whose interpretation was not in doubt. Under section 222 of the Local Government Act 1972, local authorities were empowered to bring civil proceedings for injunctions to restrain breaches of section 47. There was an obvious public interest in the enforcement of the law and his Lordship would accede to the strong case in favour of granting Kirklees an injunction to do so.
BBC Trust agrees to axe channel from TV in favour of digital moveTV
Final Top Gear reviewTV
FestivalsFive ways to avoid the portable toilets
Jurassic WorldThe results are completely brilliant
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Tunisia hotel attack: Locals form 'human shield' to protect hotel from gunman Seifeddine Rezgui
- 2 Russian officials ban yoga because it's too much like a religious cult
- 3 German ethics council calls for incest between siblings to be legalised by Government
- 4 Ginger Pride festival to take place next summer, organisers say 'time of bullying gingers is over'
- 5 Facebook rainbow profile pictures likely being tracked by social network
Glastonbury 2015: The best bits you missed from Lionel Richie and the Dalai Lama to The Libertines' secret set
Glastonbury 2015: The picture of a man crowd surfing in a wheelchair is brilliant, but it wasn't taken at Glastonbury
Fifty Shades of Grey author EL James' Twitter Q&A didn't exactly go as planned
Guillaume Tell gang-rape scene causes uproar at the Royal Opera House
Glastonbury 2015: Shocking scenes of rubbish left strewn across campsite as clean-up begins
The moment a Queen's Guard soldier lost it and drew his gun at annoying tourist
Greece crisis: IMF was pushed around by Angela Merkel and Nicholas Sarkozy – and now it is being humiliated
Greece crisis: The wider lesson is that it’s time to abandon this failed experiment in currencies
'I wish the BBC would stop calling it Islamic State' – David Cameron unleashes frustration at broadcaster
Pentagon accuses Russia of 'playing with fire' over nuclear threats towards Nato
They are neither a 'state' nor 'Islamic': Why we shouldn't call them Isis, Isil or IS