Leading Article: An inglorious episode for the press and politicans alike
Friday 10 December 1999
The epic battle was not to be. The protagonists' motives are not difficult to discern. Mr Ashcroft must have been made aware by his party's leadership that the spectacle of the party Treasurer's having to defend his reputation against suggestions, however ill-founded, that he was suspected of being in some way involved in drugs-related crimes was not exactly the best springboard for the Tories' next election campaign. Equally, the loss of millions of pounds plus the humiliation of an apology was something that even a man as wealthy as Mr Murdoch must have found an unpalatable prospect. Unsurprisingly, it looks as though this deal was brokered at the highest levels of News International and the Conservative Party, and for the lowest of expedient motives.
But the Times-Ashcroft settlement has consequences far beyond simply depriving the nation of a little entertainment.
Firstly, if any of Mr Murdoch's papers, most particularly The Times, were to return to their old allegiance and urge support for the Conservatives, such a move would be tainted by the deal that has just been done. Mr Murdoch's Euroscepticism is well chronicled. But the debt of gratitude that he owes to this settlement, one that spared him so much embarrassment and potential monetary loss, is plain to see and weakens the credibility of his papers.
Secondly, and related to that, is the price that Mr Murdoch's papers may have paid in terms of their freedom to investigate and report the affairs of the Tory party. The Times has said it "intends to draw a line under the Ashcroft Affair". That sounds an innocuous enough idea, ending unpleasantness between erstwhile friends. But it is in fact a much more sinister affair, leaving open the possibility that The Times and its sister papers may "go easy" on the Tories. This has not been a glorious episode for The Times or the Tories; it has harmed free investigative journalism and it has further tainted Mr Murdoch's stewardship of that over-large slice of the media he controls. No one can or should draw a line under that.
Watch the new House of Cards series three trailerTV
Oscars 2015It was the first time Barney has compered the Academy Awards
Oscars 2015 From Meryl Streep whooping Patricia Arquette's equality speech to Chris Pine in tears
Oscars 2015 Mexican filmmaker uses speech to urge 'respect' for immigrants
TV ReviewThe intrigue deepens as we delve further but don't expect any answers just yet
Razzies 2015 Golden Raspberry Awards 'honours' Cameron Diaz and Kirk Cameron
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Raif Badawi, the Saudi Arabian blogger sentenced to 1,000 lashes, may now face death penalty
- 2 Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
- 3 PornHub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
- 4 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
- 5 Spiritual leader allegedly manipulated 400 men into removing testicles to be 'closer to God'
Poldark star Heida Reed says show is not that racy: 'I don't think a single bodice gets ripped'
Broadchurch series 3: David Tennant and Olivia Colman to return for third season, ITV confirms
Harris' List of Covent Garden Ladies: Georgian guide to London sex workers acquired by Wellcome Collection
House of Cards season 3: Claire Underwood is based on an eagle, says Robin Wright
Game of Thrones season 5 spoilers: What we can expect according to George RR Martin's books
New theory could prove how life began and disprove God
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
This is what it's like to be dead, according to a guy who died for a bit
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut