Leading Article: An inglorious episode for the press and politicans alike
Friday 10 December 1999
The epic battle was not to be. The protagonists' motives are not difficult to discern. Mr Ashcroft must have been made aware by his party's leadership that the spectacle of the party Treasurer's having to defend his reputation against suggestions, however ill-founded, that he was suspected of being in some way involved in drugs-related crimes was not exactly the best springboard for the Tories' next election campaign. Equally, the loss of millions of pounds plus the humiliation of an apology was something that even a man as wealthy as Mr Murdoch must have found an unpalatable prospect. Unsurprisingly, it looks as though this deal was brokered at the highest levels of News International and the Conservative Party, and for the lowest of expedient motives.
But the Times-Ashcroft settlement has consequences far beyond simply depriving the nation of a little entertainment.
Firstly, if any of Mr Murdoch's papers, most particularly The Times, were to return to their old allegiance and urge support for the Conservatives, such a move would be tainted by the deal that has just been done. Mr Murdoch's Euroscepticism is well chronicled. But the debt of gratitude that he owes to this settlement, one that spared him so much embarrassment and potential monetary loss, is plain to see and weakens the credibility of his papers.
Secondly, and related to that, is the price that Mr Murdoch's papers may have paid in terms of their freedom to investigate and report the affairs of the Tory party. The Times has said it "intends to draw a line under the Ashcroft Affair". That sounds an innocuous enough idea, ending unpleasantness between erstwhile friends. But it is in fact a much more sinister affair, leaving open the possibility that The Times and its sister papers may "go easy" on the Tories. This has not been a glorious episode for The Times or the Tories; it has harmed free investigative journalism and it has further tainted Mr Murdoch's stewardship of that over-large slice of the media he controls. No one can or should draw a line under that.
Robin Thicke admits he didn't write 'Blurred Lines'music
Review: Cilla, ITV TV
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Mario Balotelli: Staff at arson-hit Manchester Dogs' Home convinced Liverpool striker is behind five-figure donation
- 2 Friends 20th anniversary: Alison Jackson photographs reunited cast
- 3 There is literally not a single woman in this iPhone 6 queue
- 4 Hitler’s former food taster reveals the horrors of the Wolf’s Lair
- 5 Scottish independence: Tory revolt against 'devo max' grows as Rail Minister Claire Perry joins
Game of Thrones star Maisie Williams cast in Channel 4 drama about cyber bullying
Friends 20th anniversary: Alison Jackson photographs reunited cast
Downton Abbey: Liam Neeson wants role as stableman in period drama
The Walking Dead season 5 synopsis: Spoilers and existential questions revealed
Friends 20th anniversary: Six things we wouldn't have without influential comedy series
Daniele Watts: Django Unchained actress detained by Los Angeles police after being mistaken for a prostitute
Scottish independence referendum: A nation divided against itself
Scottish independence: David Cameron is becoming the 'George Bush of Britain'
Russia freezes Ukraine into submission: Kiev admits country doesn't have enough fuel for winter
Scottish independence: The Queen breaks silence on referendum debate – as think tank warns of £14bn black hole if Scotland votes Yes
Archbishop of Canterbury admits doubts about existence of God