Leading article: Sending more troops to the Balkans is overdue but welcome
Monday 24 May 1999
The other is the Prime Minister's surprising and apparently reckless absolutism in his conduct of the war. From the outset he has confounded his image as a cautious politician by ruling out any "exit strategy" - except total victory. Even when President Clinton and Chancellor Schroder were at their most flaky last week, he blithely insisted there could be no compromise, and that all options, including the use of land forces, remained open.
Last week the mood of the commentators swung furthest against Tony Blair. He looked isolated and - however morally justified - naive. Public opinion and political leaders in other Nato countries simply did not appear to have the stomach for a costly ground war.
Then two important things happened. One was the first evidence that Serb military morale might be cracking. The other was the first sign of a shift in the American position in favour of ground troops. Coming just after White House leaks of Bill Clinton's rage against his friend Mr Blair for suggesting there was a split between them on this issue, this can only mean one thing. Which is that Mr Blair has, in effect, won the argument.
The President is annoyed because he has been portrayed back home as trailing in the wake of the "hawk of Nato". But he has agreed to send more troops to the Balkans because otherwise Nato - and the United States - risk being humiliated by a nasty, brutish and now, possibly, short-term dictator.
It has taken a while, but Mr Blair has what he wanted, and what should have happened long ago: a build-up of 50,000 Nato troops on the borders of Kosovo. For the sake of Nato unity, we cannot speak of invasion or even of fighting the Yugoslav army. But we can say, as Robin Cook did yesterday: "It would be more than just a peace-keeping force. It's... a substantial military force capable of providing real security and reassurance to the people of Kosovo."
It may be that in due course Mr Blair and Mr Cook will talk of Nato forces "escorting" Kosovar Albanians to their homes in a "semi-permissive environment". No matter: if it achieves the ends to which Nato is unanimously committed, it does not matter what anyone calls it. It would of course be a tremendous vindication for Mr Blair. More importantly, it would be a victory for human rights and international justice.
Bannatyne leaves Dragon's DenTV
They're back, they're big – and they're still spectacularly boringfilm
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Howard Jacobson: Let’s see the 'criticism' of Israel for what it really is
- 2 Scottish independence: Former pro-union voters explain why they changed their minds to the Yes vote
- 3 Gingers face extinction due to climate change, scientists warn
- 4 Brazil vs Germany World Cup 2014: In defence of Mesut Ozil - the Arsenal midfielder works magic in the shadows
- 5 Pornhub pleads with users to stop uploading videos of Brazil 'getting f**ked by Germany' in the World Cup
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
British jihadist calls for 'flag of Islam' over Downing Street and Buckingham Palace
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
There’s a nasty smell in the political air – and it’s coming from the Tories