Far-from-wealthy friends in in the Australian state of Victoria are able to send their children to a private school (Steiner, as it happens) because their fees are subsidised. The state government reasons that it is cheaper to pay part of the costs of educating a child privately than to bear the whole cost of keeping that child in the state system.
Everyone benefits; the state's education budget goes further, and it means private schooling is an affordable option for many more people.
I imagine that such a solution is far too reasonable for our hide-bound political system, but it seems to make perfect sense.
London N19Reuse content