Letter: Deaf jurors
Friday 14 May 1999
Sir: So the Government is planning to allow deaf people and those who do not speak English to sit on juries (report, 8 May).
To facilitate this latest piece of dangerous nonsense it is proposed that the law should be changed so that those proficient in the use of the deaf/dumb sign language, together with interpreters, should be allowed to sit in with a jury whilst it deliberates on its verdict.
It is not merely that other jurors might find it less easy to conduct their discussion under such conditions, but one would manifestly be weakening in a dangerous fashion the fairness of a trial if you had amongst the jury those who could not hear the accused, witnesses, judge and counsel and others who could hear but could not comprehend what was said. It is ludicrous.
The idea seems to have been spread abroad that it is more important to allow everyone a crack at jury service or sitting as a lay magistrate, whatever their infirmities, than to ensure a fair trail for all.
Review: A panoramic account of the hacking scandalbooks
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Scientists create transparent mouse complete with see-through organs
- 2 Pope Francis issues top 10 tips for happiness
- 3 Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
- 4 Israel's propaganda machine is finally starting to misfire
- 5 Amazonian Indian tribe filmed making contact with Brazil village in rare video footage
Land for gas: Merkel and Putin discussed secret deal could end Ukraine crisis
Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
Richard Dawkins tweets: 'Date rape is bad, stranger rape is worse'
Putin is 'thuggish, dishonest and reckless', says British ambassador to US
Boozy, ignorant, intolerant, but very polite – Britain as others see us
A new Russian revolution: The cracks are starting to appear in Putin’s Kremlin power bloc
- < Previous
- Next >