Letter: Emotional health
Monday 16 November 1998
I take their point that few experts care for the term "psychopath" but, unfortunately, it is enshrined in that Act.
They note that the Act (with its attendant safeguards) "calls for treatment in hospital against the patient's will in appropriate circumstances if `it is necessary for the health or safety of the patient, or for the protection of others persons' ". They clearly believe that they can provide such treatment and so their actions are lawful under the Act.
Suppose, though, that another psychiatrist conscientiously believes that a particular (unconvicted) disordered person is untreatable. Surely, therefore, compulsory detention of that person would be outwith the Act, unlawful and equivalent to internment without trial?
I would welcome clarifications from the Home Secretary that this was not what he was suggesting.
film Sex scene trailer sees a shirtless Jamie Dornan turn up the heat
Maisie Williams single-handedly rises to the challengeTV
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Woman falls to her death as she celebrates marriage proposal at the edge of Ibiza cliff
- 2 Venezuela Expo Tattoo 2015: Extreme body art from 'Vampire Woman' to 109mm earlobes
- 3 Saudi preacher who 'raped and tortured' his five -year-old daughter to death is released after paying 'blood money'
- 4 Dad attempts revenge on teenage daughter, plan backfires spectacularly
- 5 Ball pool for adults opens in London
9 reasons Greece's experiment with the radical left is doomed to failure
Have we reached 'peak food'? Shortages loom as global production rates slow
Greece elections: Syriza and EU on collision course after election win for left-wing party
British grandmother Lindsay Sandiford faces execution by firing squad in Indonesia
Liberal Democrat minister defends comments suggesting immigration causes pub closures
King Abdullah dead: We can't afford not to hold Saudi Arabia's royals to account