Letter: Slaughter of foxes
Monday 29 November 1999
Since there is no actual need to kill foxes and since hunting with hounds does not control their numbers, an assessment of "the distress and cruelty involved in the alternative methods of killing foxes", as suggested by Ms Renton, is pointless. All methods are cruel and, in general, they should all be abandoned.
It is nonsense for Geoff Stovold (letter, same date) to state, "The fox leads a good natural life." Most foxes will be dead by the time they are a year or so old, yet in captivity a fox will live as long as a domestic dog (ten or more years) and even in the wild they should have a lifespan of five or more years. This massive and unnatural reduction in the average age of the fox population - which destroys the social structure of family groups - has been the only discernible achievement of the fox-killers. Imagine the equivalent human society in which virtually all teenagers are parents and any person over the age of 25 is a rarity.
A cautionary tale for ambitious would-be authors
X Factor judge will appear in court later this month
Arts & Ents blogs
Fifty Shades of Grey movie: Jamie Dornan and Dakota Johnson pictured in first scenes
Downton Abbey Christmas special 2013: New pictures released
Back from the dead? Family Guy's Brian Griffin 'to make a comeback' after fan petition
Emma Stone: 'Dating Andrew Garfield makes living in LA a lot less fun'
Katie Hopkins mocks name of sick girl featured in X Factor charity appeal
- 1 Gurdwaras-turned-food banks: Sikh temples are catering for rise in Britain’s hungry
- 2 Exercise most effective lifestyle choice for preventing dementia, researchers say
- 3 Teenage girl convicted of robbery after taking pre-crime selfie wielding knife
- 4 Newly vegan Beyoncé wears fox fur to dine in meat free restaurant
- 5 'I'm experiencing austerity as well', says Princess Michael of Kent
- < Previous
- Next >