Letter: Stamp out inflation
Sir: Your leading article of 5 November rightly argues that there are inflationary pressures other than housing in the South-east. Nevertheless housing is still part of the problem. High asset values encourage borrowing, spending, especially on imports, and demands for higher wages to meet higher mortgage payments. In this context interest rates must be seen as a blunt instrument when northern exporting industry requires lower rates, not only for investment, but also to bring the exchange rate down.
Indeed, divisions within the Monetary Policy Committee recognise this dilemma, but do not accept there already exists a mechanism that could act just on the housing market. It is stamp duty. A refined duty, with more bands, regional variations, and levels varying in time according to circumstances, would smooth out house price rises, and employment in the construction industry.
Interest rates could then be used more sparingly and less dramatically in a more stable environment that would be more similar to our European neighbours. Certainly there would be a greater chance of meeting the convergence criteria for monetary union. We must recognise that we have special factors as regards home ownership and population distribution, and that loading all responsibility on interests rates is unnecessarily detrimental to other aspects of the economy.
ROBERT CROSS
Southwell, Nottinghamshire
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies