Letter: Trial by jury
Friday 21 May 1999
In a courtroom one needs to "hear" judge, counsel, barristers, defendant, witnesses; not just hear some of what they say but every single word, every nuance. The various speakers are in different positions, possibly in different lighting conditions, some even behind screens. All these factors are crucial to the deaf.
The jury room presents serious problems for those dependent upon a hearing aid or lip-reading. With the possible exception of those who use sign language, jury service presents insuperable problems to most people who have severe deafness. If it is ever my misfortune to be a defendant in court I would certainly challenge any juror with defective hearing.
Mr Strachan envisages every courtroom being equipped with "adequate communication support". Can this expense be justified? Would it really enable all deaf people to "understand and comprehend" as clearly as a person with good hearing? I rather doubt it.
Bannatyne leaves Dragon's DenTV
They're back, they're big – and they're still spectacularly boringfilm
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Howard Jacobson: Let’s see the 'criticism' of Israel for what it really is
- 3 Gingers face extinction due to climate change, scientists warn
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
British jihadist calls for 'flag of Islam' over Downing Street and Buckingham Palace
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
There’s a nasty smell in the political air – and it’s coming from the Tories