Letter: UK role in Europe
Wednesday 28 July 1999
This kind of language forces people who have hitherto considered themselves Europhiles to wonder whether Britain ought now to remain in the EU. We were pleased to join in the 1970s because we wished to be part of a co- operative trading endeavour. We did not join in order to become the battered wife of Europe, promised illusory goodies in return for doing what we were told, and threatened if we did not.
If our present choice has to be between independence from the EU and everlasting obedience to an inward-looking Franco-German sponsored bureaucracy, then, reluctantly, I think we should choose independence. We can then invest our EU budget contribution in hospitals, schools and transport infrastructures in this country and in more productive economic enterprises worldwide.
Happily, our self-esteem and long-term prosperity do not depend on the good opinion of power-hungry European commissioners. Yves Thibault de Silguy is entitled to give voice to his frustrated ambition; we are entitled to ignore him.
Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire
Review: Imaginative storytelling returns with vigourfilm
Bannatyne leaves Dragon's DenTV
Arts & Ents blogs
- 2 Why I'm on the brink of burning my Israeli passport
- 4 L'Oreal cuts ties with Belgium supporter Axelle Despiegelaere after hunting trip photographs
- 5 War is war: Why I stand with Israel
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
War is war: Why I stand with Israel
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
Socialist Worker called to apologise over ‘vile’ article saying Eton schoolboy Horatio Chapple's death is ‘reason to save the polar bears’