Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Letter: Why circumcise?

P. J. Stewart
Thursday 01 October 1998 00:02 BST
Comments

Sir: The Rev Neil Dawson asks where circumcision came from and why (letter, 29 September). The answer is that it probably came from the desert, where it was a useful precaution against sand getting trapped between foreskin and glans - a painful condition with possible abrasion and infection.

From the fact that it is practised by the aboriginal Australians, it must either have originated tens of thousands of years ago, before they were isolated from other peoples, or be the spontaneous response to similar conditions in widely separate places.

When nomads settled and became farmers, they found religious reasons for continuing what had become a useless custom. It is easy to see how the operation came to be invested with meaning, given its emotionally charged object. The Jewish variety was for many centuries just the symbolic cutting of the tip; removal of the whole foreskin was introduced only when too many Jews started passing themselves off as uncircumcised in the Greek world.

Female "circumcision" presumably originated by analogy with the male variety, since it does not occur without it. Al-Shafi'i, the only doctor of Islamic law who taught that it was obligatory to circumcise girls, explicitly based his doctrine on this analogy.

P J STEWART

St Anne's College, Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in