Letter: Wrong GM trials
Tuesday 25 May 1999
Sir: Sarah Burton (letter, 24 May) is right to make the point that when it comes to pollution from a GM crop, size does not matter. One plant can be as infective as thousands.
But I question whether these GM crop trials are really intended to assess ecological damage. For that to be so an ongoing ecological audit of the surrounding area would be necessary. There is no indication that this is being done.
It seems to me that it is more likely that these trials are intended to determine yields under various conditions of weather and chemical control, and any information of ecological damage resulting from these trials will be fortuitous.
Simon Calder looks at communities fighting back against the poachers
Arsenal 1 Everton 1: Substitute equalises with six minutes to go
booksGeese, gorillas, grandads... and growing up
Arts & Ents blogs
Downton Abbey Christmas special trailer released
Norman Rockwell’s 'Saying Grace' tops record week of art auction sales in US
Metallica play Antarctica: What other bizarre gigs have musicians played?
The man who made Femen: New film outs Victor Svyatski as the mastermind behind the protest group and its breast-baring stunts
Back from the dead? Family Guy's Brian Griffin 'to make a comeback' after fan petition
- 1 A forgotten episode in Russian history leaves links with the Philippines
- 2 Turning up the voice of America
- 3 The man who made Femen: New film outs Victor Svyatski as the mastermind behind the protest group and its breast-baring stunts
- 4 Mass murder in the Middle East is funded by our friends the Saudis
- 5 Japan cracks down on leaks after scandal of Fukushima nuclear power plant
- < Previous
- Next >