Be angry in your lyrics, not on the witness stand
Taking fellow bandmates to court is usually a mistake, says Chris Mugan
Monday 05 December 2011
News that Noel Gallagher is to take his brother to court reminds us there are few more dispiriting sights for dedicated music fans than seeing their heroes on the way to hearings.
Trussed up in unfamiliar shirt and tie combinations, they look as uncomfortable as ex-lags at job interviews. It is bad enough when artists attend divorce proceedings or face the beak for falling asleep at the wheel, but far worse is when they have brought the suit (legal, not sartorial) themselves. Any dealings with the legal system are bound to make the protagonist look petty-minded, venal or underhand.
Morrissey fans must wonder if their icon hides some masochistic streak, given his continued willingness to instigate or challenge proceedings. First, he lost the case brought by former Smiths drummer Mike Joyce to gain extra royalties. Morrissey then failed with an ensuing appeal and now is heading back into the ring to sue the NME for libel, bringing up again those accusations that he holds racist views.
Just about the only time an artist can look good in the witness stand is when they take a major label to court, as George Michael did with Sony in 1993 when he broke away from his record company citing a lack of creative freedom and support. There, at least, the solo artist can look like David taking on the money-fixated Goliath. That is far from the case, unfortunately, with Noel, who appears hellbent on hanging out his old band's dirty washing in public. In court documents, the elder Gallagher accuses his brother of abusive and irresponsible behaviour prior to Oasis's split in 2009, though surely he knew what Liam was like before he joined the band then known as The Rain, let alone when the group's success went stratospheric.
Noel first made these claims over the summer when he unveiled his debut solo release as Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds. Liam filed a suit first, forcing his brother to retract the claims and apologise. Obviously, saying sorry is a step too far for Noel in a long-running slanging match that has become one of rock's top familial spats to rival the Everley Brothers or The Kinks' Ray and Dave Davies. Taking this to court, though, is a bad idea. Not only is the law an ass, it is cloth-eared, too, even if no judge probably ever asked, "Who are The Beatles?" Nevertheless, Noel and Liam ought to carry on their name-calling via Twitter and press conferences, or, better still, pour their bile into a hard-hitting lyric.
That seemed to work for John Lennon and Paul McCartney as brickbats flew in the wake of The Beatles split. Obviously, the demise of the band involved some legal shenanigans, though much of the bitterness was played out musically. On Ram, McCartney's second album after leaving the Fab Four, he explicitly wrote "Too Many People" about Lennon. The target replied almost instantly with "How Do You Sleep?", putting the song on his Imagine album, which came out later the same year.
Hip hop, of course, would be nothing without its beefs. One of the longest and most fractious was between Ice Cube and his former bandmates in N.W.A. He left the gangsta rap pioneers following an argument about royalty payments, though rather than turn to litigation, he swiftly embarked on a quickly successful solo career, much to the chagrin of his old posse, who referred to him as the infamous American traitor Benedict Arnold. By staying out of the courts, both parties could maintain a measure of self-respect, though the experience of the courts can inspire its own sharp lines as Morrissey found for "The More You Ignore Me, The Closer I Get" – "I bear more grudges /Than lonely high court judges." Hopefully, whoever is trying his next case will prove that not to be true.
Arts & Ents blogs
Sherlock's Benedict Cumberbatch 'first sexy Holmes', says Mark Gatiss
Too upsetting? Academy members voted for Oscar-winning 12 Years A Slave 'without watching it'
Liam Neeson turned down James Bond role because Natasha Richardson said she wouldn't marry him if he took it
Jessica Alba interview: From Hollywood superwoman to household product CEO
Captain Phillips actor Barkhad Abdi struggles financially despite Oscar nomination
Apple's Tim Cook: Business isn’t just about making profit
Thousands of young people forced to go without food after benefits wrongly stopped under 'draconian' new sanctions regime
Ukraine crisis: New navy chief 'defects' and surrenders Crimean HQ as Putin claims ultranationalists forced intervention
Britain's top vet sparks controversy with call for ban on slashing animals' throats in 'ritual' slaughters for halal and kosher meat products
Ukraine crisis: Russia dismisses '3am ultimatum' as 'total nonsense'
If you're horrified by a flame-roasted dog, you should be shocked at a hog roast
- 1 International Women's Day 2014: The shocking statistics that show why it is still so important
- 2 Saudi preacher who 'raped and tortured' his five -year-old daughter to death is released after paying 'blood money'
- 3 Orgasm machine to deliver climax at the push of a button
- 4 Too upsetting? Academy members voted for Oscar-winning 12 Years A Slave 'without watching it'
- 5 Liam Neeson turned down James Bond role because Natasha Richardson said she wouldn't marry him if he took it