Podium: We'll speak to Spain, not be part of it
From a speech delivered by the Chief Minister of Gibraltar to the Royal Commonwealth Society in London
Monday 26 July 1999
Our own position is quite clear. During the 295 years that have elapsed since Spain lost Gibraltar the people of Gibraltar have acquired rights to their homeland, the same rights that were acquired by all ex-colonial peoples in their colonial territories. By the colonists in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South America and the Caribbean Countries. The people of Gibraltar have been established in their homeland for longer then any of these countries were colonies or have existed in their present status. And therefore, as you would expect, we assert our right to self- determination, which the Charter of the UN and international laws upholds as the inalienable right of all colonist peoples.
Gibraltar has rejected Spain's proposals (the so-called Matutes Proposals) for full integration of Gibraltar into Spain under Spanish sovereignty preceded by a transitional period of joint Anglo-Spanish sovereignty. The people of Gibraltar do not wish to be part of Spain and such a proposal therefore amounts to a total denial of our right to self-determination.
This does not mean that we wish to live in enmity with Spain. Far from it. We constantly seek dialogue with Spain at all political and administrative levels - municipal, provincial, regional and national governments. We have achieved it in the first three. Only the national government in Madrid has, so far, eluded us. I have offered to meet with Senor Matutes, the Spanish Foreign Minister, whenever he agrees. We do not lack the confidence and security to participate in such dialogue. We are very willing to engage Spain in dialogue. There is much to discuss. Co-operation in economic, social, cultural, judicial and law enforcement matters; bridge building and fence mending. We do, however, insist that in any process of dialogue about Gibraltar, we should be present in our own right and with our own voice, in other words that the dialogue should not be structured as bilateral between London and Madrid, since that ignores the incontrovertible fact that we must be the principal participants in such talks. Spain, on the other hand, worries that tripartite dialogue accords to the people of Gibraltar a degree of recognition that she thinks will prejudice her fundamental position on the Gibraltar issue. This need not be so and we, for our part, would be happy to work to find a formula for dialogue with which we were both content and could live.
And so, as we approach the new millennium what are our hopes and aspirations as a people?
Firstly, to assert our right to decide our own political future, free of external duress and, in exercise of that right, to obtain a modern, non-colonial, constitutional relationship with the UK.
Second, to obtain respect for our EU rights and compliance by others with their EU obligations towards us so that our compliance with our own obligations should be matched by an unfettered enjoyment of our rights in the EU in accordance with our constitutional autonomy.
Third, to continue to develop our economic, social and political fabric so that Gibraltar keeps pace with the modern, prosperous, increasingly open and transparent Europe of which it forms part.
Fourth, but not least, to engage our neighbour Spain in a process of meaningful and constructive dialogue to establish the best and most constructive and co-operative relationship between us that is possible - and reflects the fact that we are democratic neighbours within the EU.
And our hope is that as we enter the third millennium Spain will be able to modernise her own thinking and approach to the Gibraltar issue; that she will come to terms with the inescapable reality that, whatever happened 295 years ago, the people of Gibraltar in the European Community of the third millennium have rights and legitimate aspirations which need to be respected and accommodated.
We for our part understand that Spain will always be our neighbour and should, naturally, be a friend. Only through dialogue can modern, democratic politicians deal with issues such as these.
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Gun instructor accidentally shot dead by nine-year-old girl with Uzi gun
- 2 Miley Cyrus' homeless MTV VMAs date, Jesse Helt, is wanted by the police
- 3 Notting Hill Carnival: Woman shares selfie after being ‘punched in face for telling man to stop groping her’
- 4 Pamela Anderson rejects ice bucket challenge because of ALS experiments on animals: 'Mice had holes drilled into their skulls'
- 5 Homer Simpson has taken the ALS ice bucket challenge because of course he has
Led Zeppelin's Whole Lotta Love voted Greatest Guitar Riff of all time
Doctor Who lesbian kiss sparks Ofcom complaints over 'weird lesbian-lizard perv trip'
Emmys 2014: Benedict Cumberbatch, Martin Freeman and Steven Moffat win big awards for Sherlock
Homer Simpson has taken the ALS ice bucket challenge because of course he has
Beyonce MTV VMAs feminist performance: Twitter reacts to singer's 'double standard'
Exclusive: We share blame for creating 'jihad generation', says Muslim strategist
Robin Williams Emmys tribute led by Billy Crystal criticised for including 'racist' joke about Muslim woman
The Rotherham child abuse scandal is a tale of apologists, misogyny and double standards
Scottish independence TV debate: Pumped-up Alex Salmond bounces back in bruising second round against Alistair Darling
Jeremy Clarkson is a cultural tumour and needs to be removed, says comedian Frankie Boyle
Do you realise just how foolish the UK looks?
- < Previous
- Next >