Anybody who is going to make a programme about Tammy is likely to have the odd brush with predictability; then again, anybody who is prepared to call the programme "Stand By Your Man" (Radio 2, Saturday) is not likely to be much fazed by that. Sure enough, "Stand By Your Man" embraced cliche: colleagues paid tribute to Tammy's graciousness, her artistry, the thrill of simply sitting in a studio with her; her fifth husband hymned the joy of their marriage; accusations that "Stand By Your Man" is sexist were pooh-poohed; and every so often, there was a deft narrative touch: "It seemed as though personal happiness was never to be hers."
In one way, this was a terrible programme, uncritically swallowing every myth; in another, it was perfect - an ideal match of method and subject. It is possible that there is some darker, lumpier story to be told about Tammy Wynette, but I do not want to hear it. This was the one that every fan knew was true.
More instances of life living up to fiction came in "Landscape of Monsters" (Radio 4, Monday), a long fisherman's tale in which Chris Yates set out in search of giant fish. These included a carp called Potemkin, described at various junctures as "big as a cow" and as "the Dawn French of the carp world" (the context was a discussion of size as a sexually desirable feature in a female carp, so the remark actually verged on the gallant). Obviously, though, you should have seen the one that got away. The life of the salmon, in particular, has mythic resonances - I am thinking of the Oedipus myth: the male salmon, apparently, swims up the river where he was spawned to "spend his first night of love in the bed of his mother" and die. You presume the male salmon has never read Freud.
Life wholly failed to live up to fiction in "Scholars and Spies", first in a new series of Document (Radio 4, Thursday). Conyers Read was a biographer of Francis Walsingham, Elizabeth I's spymaster, who joined the American intelligence service in the Second World War. Bill Sherman set out to trace the connections; but testimony from fellow spooks and academics suggested that Read was a poor historian and an inadequate spy. Sherman scented a mystery; but the real puzzle was why such a non-story ever got broadcast.Reuse content