Ken Clarke is, of course, right that this failure to speak out contributed greatly to Mr Hague's victory - which was thus entirely avoidable! The creation of the Pro Euro Conservative list was based on the expectation that senior Conservatives who shared our view would attack Hague, should opposition to EMU become his central campaign theme. We had very good reasons for this expectation.
Above all, if Hague succeeded, getting Britain into the euro on a time- scale that would avoid damage to vital British interests must become much more difficult. Sadly, this is now the case.
But I was surprised in particular because Ken Clarke is a conviction politician. Such lethargy and complacency, when the stakes were so high, is obviously just a lapse. As must be his excuse, superficially so plausible, that pro-European Tories should not be doing the Government's work for them. For a conviction politician, the failure of others to promote the national interest increases, not diminishes, the obligation to act oneself. No doubt also a lapse, is his determination to advocate a Tory victory at the next general election, where a good showing by Hague will remove any prospect of a winnable referendum in the next parliament.Reuse content