Search engines: Serendipity - Life on Mars
Simon Singh is an author, journalist and TV producer, specialising in science and Mathematics. His latest book is "Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial", co-authored with Edzard Ernst, the world’s first professor of complementary medicine.
Sunday 29 August 1999
The Nakhla meteorite belonged to an extremely rare class of meteorites which contain igneous rock. This suggests that they originate from volcanoes, which in turn means that they originate from a planet. In comparison, the vast majority of meteorites are leftovers from the creation of the solar system and, prior to hitting Earth, have nothing to do with planets.
Some scientists argued that the Nakhla meteorite had come from Venus or Mars, while others believed that it was a piece of Earth rock that had been jettisoned into space during a devastating asteroid impact, returning to the planet millions of years later. The mystery of the meteorite's origin was eventually solved in 1982, when the Nasa scientist Donald Bogard analysed tiny bubbles of gas trapped within another igneous meteorite. The ratio of elements matched perfectly the ratio measured by the Viking spacecrafts that landed on Mars in 1976 and tested the Martian atmosphere. This strongly implied that the Nakhla meteorite was from Mars.
Martian meteorites hit the headlines in 1996 when Nasa scientists claimed to have found evidence for life on Mars. After analysing a meteorite found in Antarctica, known as ALH84001, they believed that they had discovered bacteria fossils. There was no consensus, though, as to whether or not the sausage-shaped nodules really represented Martian life, and so scientists began to reexamine other Martian meteorites. The Natural History Museum in London has a sample of the Nakhla meteorite, and in 1998 it distributed minute fragments to research groups around the world, so that they could look for more signs of Martian life.
Earlier this year, David McKay, who had been involved in the original 1996 Nasa announcement, claimed to have found bacteria fossils in the Nakhla meteorite. His discovery remains controversial, but if he is right then the implications are enormous. Although the ALH84001 meteorite is 4 billion years old, the Nakhla meteorite is only 1.3 billion years old. If there was life on Mars just a billion years ago, then there is a much greater likelihood that there is still life on Mars. Furthermore, if there are signs of life in the Nakhla meteorite, then the tragic event that took place in 1911 would be the first time that a Martian killed an Earthling.
'The Code Book - the Science of Secrecy from Ancient Egypt to Quantum Cryptography' by Simon Singh is published this week by Fourth Estate
Arts & Ents blogs
Under The Skin, film review: Scarlett Johansson is full-blooded as femme fatale alien
Doctor Who: Keeley Hawes to star alongside Peter Capaldi and Jenna Coleman
Boy George: Bad karma
Disney's Frozen is 'very evil' gay propaganda, says Christian pastor
Led Zeppelin return with new 'unheard' song after scouring vaults for unreleased recordings
Katie Hopkins continues campaign to become Britain's most hated talking head with poorly timed Bob Crow tweet
No EU referendum under Labour: Ed Miliband to reveal that vote on membership is ‘unlikely’ in next Parliament if party wins power
Grace Dent: Who cares if she spells it Barraco Barner? Gemma Worrall is more employable than some bookish arts graduate
Europeans have ‘got whiter’ due to natural selection in past 5,000 years, scientists say
Fracking is turning the US into a bigger oil producer than Saudi Arabia
How climate change helped Genghis Khan: Scientists believe a sudden period of warmer weather allowed the Mongols to invade with such success
- 1 Tony Benn meets Ali G: Watch Labour veteran burn Sacha Baron Cohen
- 2 Women do experience two different types of orgasm, study reveals
- 3 Tony Benn dead: Veteran Labour politician passes away at 88
- 4 Istanbul protesters take 'Ellen selfie' from the back of a police van
- 5 Gauthier Soho has ranted against 'food blaggers' - so can we really trust online reviews?