Serendipity: Galactic catastrophes
Simon Singh is an author, journalist and TV producer, specialising in science and Mathematics. His latest book is "Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial", co-authored with Edzard Ernst, the world’s first professor of complementary medicine.
Sunday 07 November 1999
Fortunately, it turned out that this was nothing to do with the Soviets, but rather was the result of a cosmic event. The Vela satellites have detected several other gamma ray bursts (GRBs), lasting from a fraction of a second to a few seconds. Over the last decade, astrophysicists have been able to pinpoint their location, and it is clear that the mysterious objects that cause GRBs are usually at the edge of the observable universe, and therefore the energy created must be enormous, because the radiation is still fantastically bright by the time it reaches us. GRBs are typically billions of times brighter than a supernova and they represent a power output equivalent to millions of galaxies.
Some suggest that GRBs are the result of a cataclysmic collision between two neutron stars, others hypothesise that we are observing the consequences of a neutron star falling into a black hole. While astrophysicists are both bemused and awe-struck by the most brilliant flashes in the cosmos, scientists searching for extraterrestrial intelligence view them as a possible reason why we have not yet been visited by aliens.
James Annis, a physicist at Chicago's Fermi National Laboratory, has recently pointed out that a GRB that occurs in a particular galaxy is likely to irradiate and kill all life within that galaxy. Furthermore, a galaxy is likely to have a GRB every few hundred million years, and so it seems that galaxies are sterilised at regular intervals. In a paper published in the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, Annis suggests that GRBs might destroy civilisations before they have been around long enough to develop the technology required for galactic travel.
On the other hand, astronomer Paul Davies is a little less pesimistc. A gamma-ray burst might kill land-based creatures, but deep sea creatures would probably survive, shielded by the water above them. Furthermore, organisms on the far-side of the planet, the side facing away from the radiation, would also be safe, protected by the mass of the planet between them and the GRB. In reply, Annis points out that a GRB would destroy the ozone layer and therefore have a global impact. Either way, it is unlikely that there will be a GRB in our galaxy in the next 10 million years, and so there is probably nothing for us to worry about for the time being.
Books And it is whizzpopping!
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Video of Irish 'professional boxer' fighting Istanbul neighbourhood goes viral in Turkey
- 2 Novel Scarlett Johansson tried to ban, Grégoire Delacourt’s The First Thing You See, to be published in UK
- 3 A pint of water every day is the key to losing weight, scientists say
- 4 Russia 'accidentally reveals' number of its soldiers killed in eastern Ukraine
- 5 Carol Vorderman reveals she is 'covered in burns' after she fell off her treadmill while running naked
Game of Thrones season 6: Jon Snow theorists believe the Stark may have a twin sister
Friends fan comes up with horribly dark alternative ending to sitcom
Artist takes LSD, draws herself over different stages of the 9-hour trip to show its effects
Dismaland: The artists doing cooler things than Banksy at his 'bemusement park'
Novel Scarlett Johansson tried to ban, Grégoire Delacourt’s The First Thing You See, to be published in UK
Dresden riots: Protesters in Germany attack refugee buses shouting 'foreigners out'
France train shooting: US soldiers speak of the moment they stopped gunman and 'beat him until he was unconscious'
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn accused of 'deluding' young supporters with 'claptrap'
'Women only' train carriages: Jeremy Corbyn unveils radical move to tackle public harassment
Black holes are a passage to another universe, says Stephen Hawking
Iain Duncan Smith calls for urgent ESA overhaul as part of drive to cut down welfare costs