Theatre & Dance

Showers (AM and PM) 15° London Hi 19°C / Lo 14°C

Lord of the Rings musical to close after bad reviews

By Amol Rajan

The stage version of The Lord of the Rings, the most expensive musical in West End history, is set to close in July.

Producers bowed to the inevitable after the show at Theatre Royal Drury Lane, which cost £12.5m to stage, received a critical mauling throughout most of its run. The final curtain will come down on 19 July.

It marks the end, in Britain at least, of a production that has disappointed from the start. Launched amid huge fanfare in Toronto in March 2006 after producers were unable to find a British theatre of sufficient size, the musical promised to continue the extraordinary revival of J R R Tolkien's fantasy epic following the director Peter Jackson's multiple Oscar-winning cinematic trilogy.

Instead, it was savaged by Canadian critics. The Toronto Star labelled it "Bored of the Rings", while Variety dubbed it "a saga of short people burdened by power jewellery". The show closed six months later.

Drafted across the Atlantic to replace Mel Brooks' hugely successful The Producers in Drury Lane, the show was drastically rewritten to give it a shorter running time, though, even with 40 minutes knocked off, it still lasted for three hours.

Six weeks of preview shows were also scheduled in an attempt to heighten enthusiasm and garner positive publicity, but they proved an inauspicious start.

Last May, the actor Adam Salter, who plays a ranger in the production, got his leg caught in the floorboards during one of the preview performances. Half-an-hour into the three-hour production Salter screamed "My leg, my leg", as fellow actors dressed as hobbits rushed to his rescue. The curtains swiftly came down, with some members of the audience presuming Salter was still in role. The show was cancelled for two days.

The accident proved to be a bad omen. Despite flashy pyrotechnics, acrobatics, dozens of innovative special effects and a £1m revolving stage that concealed a series of hydraulic lifts, critics lampooned the show as more middle-of-the-road than Middle Earth.

The visual spectacle of dancing orcs, hairy hobbits and singing elves did little to impress a wide spectrum of reviewers. One critic, quoting the philosopher Thomas Hobbes, said the show's run would be "nasty, brutish, and short". The Sun pronounced it simply "Flawed of the Rings".

Despite encouraging remarks by thespian luminaries including Kevin Spacey and Dame Judi Dench, who described the show as "a terrific treat" for Tolkien lovers, the show never fully recovered.

Now, after 492 performances, the lavish musical is to sing its last. Although a year-long run is far from a disgrace, The Producers lasted for twice as long, while its predecessor, the stage adaptation of Mary Poppins, ran in London for three years.

The show's producer, Kevin Wallace, remained defiant. "The show's creative team has proven just how enchanting, exhilarating and powerfully entertaining The Lord of the Rings can be live on stage", he said. "We will continue to bring this incredible theatrical event to audiences in London until 19 July, and we look forward to presenting the show to new audiences abroad from 2009."

Indeed, plans are afoot to reopen the show in Germany with a German-speaking cast, while a separate version is also being planned for a tour of New Zealand, Australia and the Far East next year.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Nonsense.
[info]posiedon07 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 07:56 pm (UTC)
The Lord of the Rings Musical at Drury Lane was, without a shadow of a doubt, THE best show I've ever seen.

I know I am not alone in this opinion, not one person I spoke to concerning the show, either directly after it, in the interval or via the internet (youtube comments, for example) had anything bad to say about it.

I think this was a case of critics trying to have a popular opinion. They expected it to be bad, expected everyone else to think it was bad, and so proclaimed it bad, watching the performance without even a hint of an open mind.

Toronto was bad, very bad. London was spectacular. The effects were amazing, the score was brilliant, easily able to stand seperate to the show it was part of and the performances, the acting was good and the singing was exceptional.

I find it difficult to see how it is possible not to have enjoyed the show, and I think that critics, although often very accurate, need to base their opinions on what they see, rather than what they expect to see.

it was good
[info]cluness wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 08:37 pm (UTC)
i went to see it and i thought it was fantastic, i realy enjoyed it and it was well worth the 600 miles i traveld to see it, i wish they would record westend shows for the video market as a matter of course. for all the people that cant get to london, and for those who do see productions can keep the memorys alive, at the moment i have Never forget, bad girls and Our house on DVD, they are all fantastic and a great peice of marketing!! i only wish i had a copy of this show to keep for ever too!
closed after bad reviews?
[info]wkrijthe wrote:
Tuesday, 7 April 2009 at 05:44 pm (UTC)
My wife and me went to London to celebrate New Year 2008 and as soon as we heard about this musical we decided to make this musical a part of our trip. And we were not disappointed.

True, Frodo is nothing like Frodo in the movies, but how can it be? It's a musical!

True, they skipped a number of parts, but how can you not? You've only got a stage (and the rest of the theater, as they appeared even on the balcony) to represent a world which in the movies only barely was possible to represent by one country! I've read Lord of the Rings at least 5 times, and I already missed a number of things in the movies, even in the extended version, lasting over 12 hours! To be honest, I didn't expect to see as much as I read in the book, because how can you put so much in so little time. Don't people realise this??? I was, in truth, amazed how much they were able to put in the show!

We found the decor magnificent, some of the changes between scenes absolutely fascinating, and the overall experience one we'll remember always. We're both hoping this musical will be released on DVD, even though we realise that a DVD will never be able to replace the magnificence of being there!

I hope the musical will come to Europe, possibly even to my own country, The Netherlands, but I hope it won't be a translated version. I would love to see the same cast as I saw on New Year's Day in London, because I believe everyone who took part in this production did way more than I possibly expected from a musical production based on J.R.R. Tolkien masterpiece.
I agree with Poseidon07
[info]mpgreensmith wrote:
Thursday, 25 June 2009 at 01:15 pm (UTC)
I awatied a long time for this show, and as another has said, was not dissappointed. I even cut my holiday short to return to London to see the show, which was spectacular, the effects were brilliant and the singing superb, which an be justified by the fact I now have the music, which I listen to in an attempt to rekindle the magic. The best scene of the whole musical, which was as spellbinding and spectacular as anything within the films, was what shone for me. The Balrog, if you or anyone had seen that, then their opinion would be thoroughly changed. The sun? You have quoted the Sun?, the last place I would go for my cultural updates...

There is much more to say, yet my patience runs thin.