Good Morning Britain review: A dizzying attempt at a breakfast show
The high-paced newsy offering will have to work hard to rival BBC Breakfast
Ian Burrell is Assistant Editor and Media Editor at The Independent, i paper and Independent on Sunday. He covers news from the whole media sector from television, press, radio and advertising to technology. His weekly column on the media appears every Monday in The Independent and i paper. He also writes on media, music and culture, including long-form pieces for The Independent’s Saturday magazine and the Independent on Sunday’s magazine, New Review. He is a regular presenter of BBC Radio 4’s What The Papers Say and a specialist commentator to Monocle 24 radio. He has contributed to most major broadcast outlets including BBC television and radio, CNN, Sky News, Al Jazeera and LBC. He has also written on media for GQ magazine. Ian has been reporting on the media industry for The Independent for more than a decade. Previously he was the newspaper’s Home Affairs Editor. He worked at The Sunday Times for five years, including as a member of the investigative Insight team, covering stories on political funding, industrial espionage and the arms industry. Previously he worked in ITV for London Weekend Television, on a weekly current affairs programme presented by Danny Baker. Ian trained at the Birmingham Post & Mail and was Regional Reporter of the Year in Press Gazette’s national awards.
Monday 28 April 2014
So far behind was ITV trailing in the breakfast ratings that it needed a show with distinctive flavour if it was to recover ground on the BBC.
What viewers of the launch edition of Good Morning Britain got was neither the Eggs Benedict nor the Kedgeree nor the Kellogg’s Coco Pops of breakfast television – but rather an unpalatable concoction of the lot.
It began inauspiciously with the sight of the irrepressible former children’s show host Andi Peters in a Leeds market usually after 6am before falling back on a format clearly borrowed from ABC’s Good Morning America.
Instead of the usual British breakfast sofa, the show’s four presenters were camped behind a vast glass-topped desk with a backdrop of the dome of St Paul’s and the London skyline.
While the pre-launch hype had focused on presenter Susanna Reid, who had jumped ship from the BBC in a reputed £1m deal, she was not the obvious star of the show as the four hosts shared out the headlines which were dealt with at a dizzying rate.
The result was a high-paced newsy offering which is much more squarely in the territory of rival BBC Breakfast than ITV’s previous offering, Daybreak, an expensive experiment that was scrapped after four years with ratings down to 600,000 (compared to the BBC’s 1.6m).
ITV has a long tradition in breakfast television, from the launch of TV-am in 1983 through to its long-running successor GMTV, which was on air for 17 years.
But Good Morning Britain’s choice of an American-style format seems to have discomfited many of the viewers who took to social media during its debut show. The large desk was seen as an oppressive “barrier” between the hosts and the audience while the multitude of presenters was overbearing.
Sky’s Kay Burley took to Twitter to say “Just watching Good Morning Britain…there’s so much going on I need a little lie down”. Her comments shouldn’t be dismissed as the nervousness of a broadcast rival and echoed the thoughts of “Satnavsooz” who said it was “too busy”.
Sean Fletcher, Susanna Reid, Ben Shephard, and Charlotte Hawkins host ITV's Good Morning Britain
But just as Good Morning Britain seemed to be setting out its stall as a committed news programme back it went to the market where Peters was now giving away £50 prizes on something called The Wheel of Cash (39 years after NBC unveiled the Wheel of Fortune format).
This crunching gear change and lack of originality was later repeated with the arrival of the show’s star guest Paul O’Grady. The news stories had evaporated and we could have been back watching ITV morning stalwart Lorraine Kelly.
In between, Good Morning Britain courted a younger audience by fawning over the boy band One Direction.
The overall result, as a commentator on the Radio Times blog noted, was that the show was “trying too much, too many times for too many people”.
It was never going to be easy launching into a market where the BBC has such a commanding position and at a time of day when other media have audiences that breakfast television can only dream of.
As a contributor to the Digital Spy website observed, “Radio is king in the mornings” and no matter how much Good Morning Britain improves it’s never likely to be able to compete with John Humphrys and the Today programme or Chris Evans on Radio 2.
Game of Thrones
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 The difference between a migrant and refugee, in one sentence
- 2 Miley Cyrus calls out hypocrisy of women’s nipples being taboo
- 3 Celebrity Big Brother 2015: Tila Tequila kicked off show after 'describing Hitler as a good man'
- 4 iPhone 5c to be discontinued, no iPhone 6c to replace it
- 5 Blood Moon and Supermoon: September to bring brightest – and dimmest – full Moon of the year on same night
Game of Thrones season 6: Jon Snow theorists believe Ned Stark's son may have a twin sister
Artist takes LSD, draws herself over different stages of the 9-hour trip to show its effects
These Harry Potter lipsticks are sparking all sorts of controversy with Hogwarts fans
Game of Thrones season 6: Director promises most exciting premiere yet 'starts off with a bang'
Hunted: Channel 4 to test 'surveillance Britain' by taking Big Brother to sinister new lengths
Climate change: 2015 will be the hottest year on record 'by a mile', experts say
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn accused of 'deluding' young supporters with 'claptrap'
'Women only' train carriages: Jeremy Corbyn unveils radical move to tackle public harassment
Black holes are a passage to another universe, says Stephen Hawking
Iain Duncan Smith 'should resign over disability benefit death figures', says Jeremy Corbyn
Iain Duncan Smith calls for urgent ESA overhaul as part of drive to cut down welfare costs