TV & Radio

Rain (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 11°C / Lo 4°C

Last Night's TV: No prizes for the pedigree chumps

Pedigree Dogs Exposed, BBC1; Olympics 2008 BBC1

By Thomas Sutcliffe

Judging from last night's Pedigree Dogs Exposed, the very worst thing you can have stirred into your genetic mix – far more debilitating than a disease-bearing gene – is human self-regard and vanity. Nature, after all, has its ways of getting around defective genes, so that only the fittest survive. But nature has no answer to the inbred self-righteousness of many dog breeders, a species dedicated to the creation and maintenance of canine cartoons. If it's desirable for your particular breed cartoon to have a flat upturned nose, then that's what you'll get, even if – as in the case of many pedigree pugs – half of your soft palate is pushed down your throat as a result. And if the cartoon requires a pertly cute little skull shape, you'll get that, too, and you'll just have to put up with the fact that there's no longer quite enough room for your brain, so that you may end up in twitching agony with a disease called syringomyelia.

Jemima Harrison's powerful film began with some case studies of cavalier spaniels, which had suffered from this disease – known to be a problem for the breed – and I imagine it will have gone off like a bomb in quite a few British living rooms. I wouldn't count myself as a dog lover. In fact, I only recently qualified as a dog tolerator, after several unrewarding years of intimacy with a wire-haired fox terrier. So if this footage can make me angry, I don't like to think what it will do to viewers with a more heartfelt interest in canine welfare.

The burden of Harrison's film was simple. There are rising levels of disease and distress in pedigree breeds as humans tinker with their genetic make-up to suit their own entirely artificial notion of "breed purity". And the Kennel Club – keeper of the flame of breed type and promoter of dog-show ideals – is not doing nearly enough to prevent the pain and suffering continuing. The case of Rhodesian ridgebacks neatly exemplifies the problem. For the Kennel Club, and ridgeback breeders, the dogs' spinal ridge is "the escutcheon of the breed", an indispensable element of any prize-winning dog. In scientific terms, though, the ridge is also a marker of disease and spinal deformity, and breeding for more prominent ridges has led to an increasing number of dogs with spinal problems. Left to their own devices, the dogs would soon put this right, but ridgeback breeders take care that puppies born without a ridge don't contaminate the gene pool with their unsightly good health. This isn't always easy, given the perverse reluctance of some vets to kill healthy puppies. "We do have trouble nowadays with the young vets who tend to see everything in black and white," said one ridgeback breeder. "'It's a healthy, beautiful puppy, there's nothing wrong with it except that it hasn't got a ridge,'" she continued, parodying their woolly-minded soft-heartedness. In many cases, the disease is intimately knitted together with the characteristics that have been decreed "desirable". George the pug, a hairy collage of physical abnormalities, demonstrated the point nicely. Pugs are supposed to have tightly curled tails, but breed for that and you get twisted spines thrown into the mix for free. George's spine kinked like a crank handle, but it hadn't stopped him qualifying for Crufts, and Harrison had come up with several cases here in which breeders were knowingly breeding from dogs with serious genetic disorders, a situation that the Kennel Club appears to have done little to prevent.

Harrison's most potent evidence, though, was the contrast between Victorian specimens of various breeds, and their grotesquely exaggerated modern counterparts. The Victorian basset hound was unmistakably still a dog, sturdy and handsome. The modern show basset – draped with folds of skin and belly scraping the ground – is a sideshow freak. This was a film that should have legislative consequences, and in the meantime the BBC itself might like to reflect on how it contributes to the problem with its uncritical coverage of Crufts, the Olympics of engineered disability.

At the other Olympics, the commentators are pacing themselves for the tricky middle stretch. "Adrian, if the Olympics were a 400-metre race on the track, we'd be just about to head up to the first bend," said Hazel, as the morning's coverage began. No obvious signs of exhaustion yet, which is frankly astonishing to this particular viewer, though even I felt invigorated by two British triumphs in the "Who Can Ride Slowest Without Falling Off the Bike" finals. Unfortunately, an earlier attempt to understand the rules of the madison – a bicycle race more intractably complicated than a Balkan peace summit -- meant I had to withdraw injured before the final tape.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

ridebacks
[info]dixibabe wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 12:20 pm (UTC)
it has been suggested in other articles i have read that the ridge is a deformaty..if this is the case why does the original wild dog have a ridge and first recording of this is in 17th century...i do think the breeders of today do take things to extreme and this should be stopped but i disagree listing ridgebacks as one of the most prominant dogs to exclude from crufts..what i know of breeders is they do not breed from dogs with dermoid sinus...i was lucky to own my ridgeback for 13 years and now have a new puppy from a reputable breeder who breeds for health and temperament.
Aussieman
[info]aussieman01 wrote:
Thursday, 10 September 2009 at 01:08 pm (UTC)
The show was obviously propaganda for multiculturalism with 'ban pure-breds', 'mixed (mongrels) are more healthy'. If they is true, then why was Obama a communist (disease of the mind?) (drug and tobacco) smoking, cocaine addict, who has won 2 Grammy Awards whilst studying 'Saul Alinsky'. Listen to his audio booksm dreams of my father, etc.

Also, Why have kings and queens for millenia been the smartest people about?

I would rather follow the instruction of a King or Queen than 'Bob the Builder'... unless it was in building matters.

Also, proof against the over-arching message that 'pure-breds are wrong/bad'... back in Israel, the National IQ is 85. (100 is by definition the 'average score' of test scorers on a particular test, Australia's Average for a man is about 107, 104 for women). There is a group, the Cohen/Cohn/Kohan/Kohn/etc spelling varients that have an Average IQ of 114!

The Cohn's exclusively breed with other Kohen, they are the priest class (so-call direct decendants of Moses' Bro Aaron, or Azza as we call him sometimes)? It is illegal in Israel for a Cohen to marry a non-Cohen (it is ment to be punishable by death).

If the toughest dogs breed together, you end up with tough dogs. If the smartest people/dogs/cats/horses breed together, you end up with smarter offspring on average.

Why does the woman not advocate sterilising mentally reatarded people, for instance? There is someone in the Journals that has 4% of his brain. His IQ is 85, he is a bit slow, yet not officially 'retarded'. Maybe a Spanial is such a lovely lap dog, because it's brain is defective from it's 'Wolf ancesters'?

Purposly breeding the siblings and parents together is dodgy, unless the animals are near on extinction.

Where the problem lies, is that the dogs are not allowed to breed naturally... the Alpha Male gets the girls... until he is superceeded by another. Also in desexing dogs, you end up with 10000 individuals with 10 breeding pairs producing all of the off-spring.

Conversly to my own statement, lions... when a new alpha male comes to power, he naturally (without human influence) kills the cubs to make room for his own. That he may live through his children.

What do you think?

Also for the pure-bred arguement... why (for generalisations) are the fastest runners 100% black, but black people suck in the pool?!?!?!? No pointing out about us having different bone structures, black people with an extra ankle bone for spring, that impedes them in swimming, etc.

????

Most popular in Arts & Entertainment

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date