Just £4bn will save a generation from starvation, says UN
G8 agriculture ministers try to halt 'spiral of hunger' created by drought, falling prices and credit crunch
Agriculture ministers from the world's richest countries are holding an unprecedented meeting this weekend as the United Nations warns that hunger threatens to "spiral out of control" in the wake of the financial crisis.
The three-day meeting, which opened in Italy yesterday, will address a growing food crisis as harvests threaten to slump at a time when record numbers of people are already hungry. Crops are being hit by a combination of bad weather, falling food prices and farmers' being refused credit to buy seeds and fertilisers.
It is the first time that the agriculture ministers of the G8 leading economies have held such a meeting, and they have invited their counterparts from China, India, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, Australia, Argentina and Egypt to join them in Treviso "to work out a common route to lead us out of the crisis and respond to the world food emergency".
The UN's World Food Programme warned: "As the global financial crisis deepens, hunger and malnutrition are likely to increase as incomes fall and unemployment rises. The world is at a critical juncture where we risk watching hunger spiral out of control. We cannot afford to lose the next generation."
The crisis began even before the start of the credit crunch, at a time of record harvests. About two years ago food prices started to rise abruptly, despite the bumper crops, mainly because of the increased use of corn to make biofuel, particularly in the US, and increasing meat consumption – which mops up grain supplies to feed livestock – by the rising middle classes in developing countries such as India and China. Prices of wheat and corn doubled in a year – and rice more than trebled – leading to the first steep and sustained rise in hunger in decades.
A record crop last year did not help much. It brought the cost of grain down in rich countries, which saw most of the increased production, but not in developing ones where the poor live, partly because their currencies fell against the dollar in which international prices are set.
Yet it led to farmers in Europe and the US planting less this year because they can expect lower returns at a time when it is harder than ever to get loans. The US Department of Agriculture reported this month that 7 per cent less land is being used to grow wheat, in a country that helps to supply 100 nations around the world.
China – which feeds a fifth of the world's people off just a 10th of its cropland – did increase sowing but, in another cruel twist of fate, was then hit by its worst drought in nearly 70 years, cutting yields by up to 40 per cent. And drought has also led to a similar slump in another of the world's great grain-growing regions, Argentina, Paraguay and southern Brazil.
All this means, says the Food and Agriculture Organisation, that harvests are set to fall his year "in most of the world's major producers". The UN adds that it would cost $6bn (£4bn) to stave off the resulting hunger, which would be "relatively inexpensive compared to the trillion-dollar rescue packages designed to save financial institutions".
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Reduce your global impact.
Comments
Instead, it's a basket case, because the men of the 'land' don't work, never will and continue to sit on their arses (that's when they're not screwing any female available), waiting for the next aid truck to arrive.
Time for intelligent foreign administrators to intervene. Europeans? They won't accept us (unlike our aid), so bring in Koreans, Chinese and other intelligent peoples who would solve Africas near non-existent, subsistence agricultural output, within a few years.
Oh, and the big sustainability debate? If Africa didn't need feeding by the rest of the world (crunch that into your sustainability equation), and it produced food on a vast scale (it's fertile land is perfectly capable of doing so), this pathetic debate wouldn't be repeated constantly. Tragic, absolutely bloody tragic.
Just GBP 4 Bn will save a generation from starvation, says UN
UN, the West, the so-called International Community, Oxfam etc have no interest in solving the Global food shortage and poverty problems. If they had any real interest, then they would already have solved these problems. The scandal which is the MDG's (Millennium Development Goals) which keep moving their realisation dates backwards are only one symptom of the malaise. This global indifference is a sin, which the Vatican, Canterbury, the Judaic and the Islamic Bodies should rail against, but dont. One big cosy club, one massive moral crime against humanity. God
will judge all these transgressors. Especially Tony Blair's afterlife will not be what he expects.
Mr Alex Weir, Gaborone and Harare
I hate to say it, but it's a good thing so many in Africa starve and die from Aids - if they didn't they would breed even more and then there';d be even more starvation and famines.
Tackling starving africans is absurd. We should be devloping means to sterilise populations so they can;t breed. And aid to africa does not work - aid just perpetuate typical african corruption. At least in asia they have since WWII got richer - 60 years ago they were as poor as Africa.
Fact may well be that Africans, with a lower average IQ and no sens of the common good, with their silly tribal loyalties and mumbo jumbo, just are not fit to rule or manage these countries. The richest country in africa is south africa, which was built and managed and kept prosperous by whites.
Sad, but that is the elephant in th room people cannot accept because it doesn;t fit their PC agenda. Let them starve in africa - or else they'll have 10 kids each if they survive, and then what? More famine, disease and conflict. Giving them aid so they can all survive is a short-term emotive response to a long term population crisis. Waste of everyone's time and money.
However, africa, full of starving people (and billionaire dictators of course who give nothing to their people), has no population regulation except starvation - so perhaps we should let these africans die so that the population is controlled. No aid to africa is the best policy perhaps.
You are obvious lacking knowledge on the explosion in poplation in africa in the last 50 years and how aid has done nothing to help. The more people you have the more war, conflict, environmental problems, famine,. disease, crime etc etc etc.
By the way, there is no such thing as a meme. Nor any such thing as 'a former USA'. You seem confused.
Exactly. People in overpopulated rich nations think that it is an African problem, whereas the reality is, it's a worldwide problem. There are just too many people everywhere, many of them consuming far too much stuff.
Sadly, most people are still oblivious of the fact that the industrialised agricultural system is simply a mechanism for converting 'oil into food'; when the oil supply goes down, as seems to be happening right now, the industrialised food system will go down with it.
The big debate is whether the US agricutural system will start to implode this year, or whther we might have to wait another year or two before it happens. Australia, another major exporter of food, also appears to be in very deep trouble.
Oil at $50 a barrel will keep things ticking along for a while longer: oil at $150+ a barrel will bring most things to a standstill. That suggests oil will be kept at around $50 for a while longer.
If I am wrong, expect oil to be $300 a barrel within a week of the attack, whatever demand destruction is taking place.
Lyndsay Williams (YouTube) insists that the 'powers that be' will manipulate oil to at around $50 for several months, until they are ready to execute the next phase of their plans.
Many of us are waiting for August, to see what damage the coming hurricane season is likely to do.
Beyond that, September/October are very popular months for orchestrating financial meltdowns.
Disease in combination with the cold war which involved the USA and the USSR picking a dictator and then arming them to the teeth explains any post colonial slide.
Only a bigot would suggest that that "intelligent peoples" need to get involved especially given that in very recent history the Chinese great leap forward starved 64 million people and the British colonialists who "won't be accepted" starved millions in India and Ireland. This is because bigot's have to wear history blinkers. Which leads them to think things like people who are unemployed are lazy. As in the 1930s there was a lazyness outbreak which is making a comeback now.
Anyone who's had a go at subsistance farming will probably realize that people surviving in the village don't do lazy as the fact that they are alive is testament to their hardwork*. It's Tractors vrs Hoes not African vrs European or the "Intelligent Peoples".