Nature

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 9° London Hi 14°C / Lo 10°C

Are mobile phones wiping out our bees?

Scientists claim radiation from handsets are to blame for mysterious 'colony collapse' of bees

By Geoffrey Lean and Harriet Shawcross

It seems like the plot of a particularly far-fetched horror film. But some scientists suggest that our love of the mobile phone could cause massive food shortages, as the world's harvests fail.

They are putting forward the theory that radiation given off by mobile phones and other hi-tech gadgets is a possible answer to one of the more bizarre mysteries ever to happen in the natural world - the abrupt disappearance of the bees that pollinate crops. Late last week, some bee-keepers claimed that the phenomenon - which started in the US, then spread to continental Europe - was beginning to hit Britain as well.

The theory is that radiation from mobile phones interferes with bees' navigation systems, preventing the famously homeloving species from finding their way back to their hives. Improbable as it may seem, there is now evidence to back this up.

Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) occurs when a hive's inhabitants suddenly disappear, leaving only queens, eggs and a few immature workers, like so many apian Mary Celestes. The vanished bees are never found, but thought to die singly far from home. The parasites, wildlife and other bees that normally raid the honey and pollen left behind when a colony dies, refuse to go anywhere near the abandoned hives.

The alarm was first sounded last autumn, but has now hit half of all American states. The West Coast is thought to have lost 60 per cent of its commercial bee population, with 70 per cent missing on the East Coast.

CCD has since spread to Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece. And last week John Chapple, one of London's biggest bee-keepers, announced that 23 of his 40 hives have been abruptly abandoned.

Other apiarists have recorded losses in Scotland, Wales and north-west England, but the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs insisted: "There is absolutely no evidence of CCD in the UK."

The implications of the spread are alarming. Most of the world's crops depend on pollination by bees. Albert Einstein once said that if the bees disappeared, "man would have only four years of life left".

No one knows why it is happening. Theories involving mites, pesticides, global warming and GM crops have been proposed, but all have drawbacks.

German research has long shown that bees' behaviour changes near power lines.

Now a limited study at Landau University has found that bees refuse to return to their hives when mobile phones are placed nearby. Dr Jochen Kuhn, who carried it out, said this could provide a "hint" to a possible cause.

Dr George Carlo, who headed a massive study by the US government and mobile phone industry of hazards from mobiles in the Nineties, said: "I am convinced the possibility is real."

The case against handsets

Evidence of dangers to people from mobile phones is increasing. But proof is still lacking, largely because many of the biggest perils, such as cancer, take decades to show up.

Most research on cancer has so far proved inconclusive. But an official Finnish study found that people who used the phones for more than 10 years were 40 per cent more likely to get a brain tumour on the same side as they held the handset.

Equally alarming, blue-chip Swedish research revealed that radiation from mobile phones killed off brain cells, suggesting that today's teenagers could go senile in the prime of their lives.

Studies in India and the US have raised the possibility that men who use mobile phones heavily have reduced sperm counts. And, more prosaically, doctors have identified the condition of "text thumb", a form of RSI from constant texting.

Professor Sir William Stewart, who has headed two official inquiries, warned that children under eight should not use mobiles and made a series of safety recommendations, largely ignored by ministers.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Another fact about Electromagnetic Fields
[info]namesmaster wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 06:03 am (UTC)
Don't forget to relate the H.A.A. R. P. project...

US Marine hare secret working on it... to prevent new Katrinas... they can altered the ecosystem.
Re: Another fact about Electromagnetic Fields
[info]beedead wrote:
Friday, 20 February 2009 at 06:34 pm (UTC)
Or to create MORE Katrinas. We're not sure who is on whose side anymore. Getting people to stop using cell phones would be as difficult as getting the United States to stop invading the countries that hold the largest oil reserves on the planet. Even Obama can't stop that machine -- he's been put in the hot seat and that spot is controlled by the big money families of the world. Ultimately the US will go the way Nazi Germany went, but the world impact will be much bigger this time. Fewer survivors, if any.
death by phone
[info]beedead wrote:
Friday, 20 February 2009 at 06:21 pm (UTC)
The only mystery is why the cell phone providers would want to kill all their customers. Well, alright, its not a mystery, its greed. The big phone providers are making money and suppressing scientific studies on the hazards of high frequency radiation on living things. Holding a microwave frequency transmitter up to your head is a brilliant thing to do, eh? And worth every brain cell you cook just so you can make phone calls everywhere all the time (another great way to spend your life). The environment is awash in all kinds of radio waves that weren't around 100 years ago. It will take some time for the uneducated masses to discover that electromagnetic radiation is not only good for cooking your frozen meal, but also everything else. It is a hazard hiding in plain site -- you can't see it so how could it possibly hurt you? The scientific studies that have been done independently prove the hazard is real. The studies done by cell phone makers prove them harmless. Who do you think is lying? Cell phone makers have more money to spend on advertising and media brainwashing than independent researchers. Guess who wins. NOBODY! We all lose! Except, of course, the short-term gains of the owners of cell phone companies. Wake up people!
bees
[info]hat4evr wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 01:54 pm (UTC)
wots that bug thats eating de bees cus I just found queen bumblebee in my bedroom and it was dopy so I took it outside on a piece o paper an its back split open and this brown bug came out i was shocked I hadnt noteced dis bug till it ate de bee alive i was almost roring I mean it took about ten seconds to carry dat bee downdsters dat is quick 4 it to be eaten alive! it was just SICK dat poor bee
Re: bees
[info]mightydrunken wrote:
Friday, 9 October 2009 at 04:11 pm (UTC)
Well varroa mite has been in the news a lot regarding bees but it does not sound like that as the mite do not as such eat a bee they are more like a massive (for a bee) flea or tick.

There are lots of parasitic wasps species which lay their eggs in many different insects. I don't know if any of them eat bees.

But I do love bees! My dad and mum were bee keepers and I have always been fascinated by their social characteristics.
Save the bee!
[info]rickgammons wrote:
Monday, 23 March 2009 at 04:46 pm (UTC)
Mobiles are becoming a persons most valuable possession because of the connectivity they provide. Phone, SMS, Instant Messaging, Facebook, Emails everything from a tiny handheld device. With all this on offer every 12 - 30 year old needs one just to keep in touch with everyone.

We are well past the point of return in my opinion. Just like alcohol, this will spiral out of control. By the time we actually do know the full extent of the damage mobile phones are causing to us and our surroundings I suspect it will be far too late.
it's too late to hang up the cell phone already!
[info]davidhandelman wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:46 pm (UTC)
Unfortunately, like many of the environmental and health issues affecting us and our planet today, our society has become so reliant on them, that turning back does not seem to be a likely option. How many people today would be willing to give up their cell phone to save the bees? Not many. In fact, most people won't stop using them, even if conclusive evidence shows that they cause cancer.
For that reason, it may be further technological advances that can save us. Perhaps there is a way to prevent damage to bees and our brains, but still allow us to use cell phones. After all, the CFC's in spray cans were destroying the ozone layer, but instead of stopping to spray, we developed CFC-free cans, and pump action spray bottles.
However, in order for that to happen, there has to be a strong consumer demand... So it's important for all of us to communicate this around to friends and family and apply pressure to our cell phone carriers and phone manufacturers to research this...
great
[info]shri123 wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 08:06 am (UTC)
hello buddy i read yopur comment dear it's great i like it dear thanx for this information

Before applying and interviewing for your dream job, make sure you have gone over the following interview tips update your resume then research the company then prepare for the job interview questions at http://www.londonofficejobsuk.com we have all the answers :-)
===========================================
Neil
=========================================
londonofficejobs-londonofficejobs
right cause, wrong mechanism
[info]flowirin wrote:
Sunday, 19 April 2009 at 09:07 pm (UTC)
its simpler than that. mobile phone towers are microwaves. bees are small, and fly a lot. they simply get cooked. 3g should fix this, as it operates at a different frequency.
thanks
[info]franchise999 wrote:
Tuesday, 21 April 2009 at 08:48 pm (UTC)
Thanks for writing, decent article.

Derek mobile Franchises
microwaves
[info]avraamjack wrote:
Tuesday, 21 April 2009 at 11:24 pm (UTC)
How did we ever get the idea that blanketing our environment with microwave RADIATION was a good idea?

Ban microwave transmissions.

We can live without cellphones and wireless networks.

.
Bee colony colaps
[info]micromike wrote:
Thursday, 23 April 2009 at 10:48 pm (UTC)
I have been convinced for some time that electromagnetic radiation particularly in the micowave part of the spectrum is responsible for the bee problem. It might not be their navigation thats disrupted but damage to their internal organs reducing reistance to disease and parasites.
If it is not mobile phones it could be more powerful radiation such as military Radar, or some other secret device
It seems to be more prevelant in the northern hemisphere..
I have tried to get Professor Ratnieks interested as he is doing research at Sussex university but have so far had no reply from his department.
Re: Bee colony colaps
[info]mightydrunken wrote:
Friday, 9 October 2009 at 04:01 pm (UTC)
Why would you suspect microwave radiation in particular?

CCD has many other potential causes, many more compelling then the absurdly weak signal which is what we experience most of the time. Considering that the USA has been particularly hard hit and most hives are placed in massive fields far from human habitation seems a strike against the hypothesis.

Consider that CCD seems to only occurr in countries that have varroa mite. Australia is one of the few without varroa and as far as I know have not experienced excessive CCD.

It is easy to imagine how a powerful pesticide or a sloppily applied one could wipe out hives. Often hives are right next to the crop.

My personal belief is that varroa mite is the main cause of the problem, possibly spreading disease among bees at the same time.
nothing new
[info]paulds65 wrote:
Monday, 11 May 2009 at 04:10 pm (UTC)
The developers knew of these dangers before the products were released. Can't anyone else recall how this same information was suppressed by the phone manufactures in years past? Society had better wake up to the fact that desire for money has corrupted all facets of this world.
Doesn't explain why the hives are jinxed
[info]secretdetails wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 11:03 am (UTC)
Fair enough that phones may melt your head. But I do not see how residual electro magnetics can jinx a hive from all and sundry from wanting to inhabit it. Seems more likely that the nicotine based pesticides are becoming stronger due to the plants actually having evolved systems of putting pesticides in the 'needed' places within the plant.
Mobile Phones
[info]catfishspy wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 03:34 pm (UTC)
Mobile phones might come free from the networks with a contract, but they always cost lots of money to replace. If you have a pay-as-you-go phone, you will know. Protect yourself with mobile phone insurance for loss, water damage, theft, international cover and more.
health hazards from microwave & cell phones
[info]cuqui1 wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 04:31 pm (UTC)
it is my understanding that it disrupts your neurophysiology leading to impairment of the recuperative sleep. Sleep architecture's slow wave sleep, stage 3 & 4 REM cycle becomes impaired. According to news reports in Spain particularly in rural areas where cell phones relay towers are erected, local town folks have publicly complained to the media about their discontents and their consequential collective symptoms which include amomg others, chronic fatigue symptoms and unexplained weight gain and obesity.
Poor old bees
[info]angiedebts wrote:
Thursday, 13 August 2009 at 05:45 pm (UTC)
If this is the case then we all need to make sure that it doesn't harm humans and other life in a similar way and quickly.
Bee Safe
[info]danuk1 wrote:
Wednesday, 19 August 2009 at 05:51 pm (UTC)
There should be areas that are free from mobile phone masts to test the affects on bees.

and people should be using more hands free kits

Iphone insurance
Poor bees
[info]newmobilephones wrote:
Monday, 24 August 2009 at 04:31 pm (UTC)
I feel really sorry for the bees, they didn't ask to have their antenae messed around.
It can not be
[info]pyramatboy wrote:
Wednesday, 2 September 2009 at 11:37 am (UTC)
But how do you explain that many areas where there are no mobile phones have also seen a drastic decrease in the number of bees?
trees and bees
[info]islandshepherd wrote:
Monday, 5 October 2009 at 12:25 am (UTC)
its' not just the bees that are going to die. and cell phone towers and related emissions are not the only thing we are doing to harm this planet and it's delicate ecosystems. once the bees are irriversably endangered how much longer will we be able to sustain ourselves with hand polination with the help of other creatures that help polinate our crops and plant life that gives us the oxygen we breath as well. then what other life forms are we going to watch slowly die off by things we decide are more important. or better yet hunt into extinction. then there is the polution of our atmosphere, oceans and lakes and clear cutting of forests and urban sprawl and over mining and bladiblah blah blah. things that we have heard so many times that most of us simply turn a blind eye to. we have the technology the science and the understanding that we are indeed, screwing the planet and ourselves over. and what for? money, convenience, ego ... bling? then there are the people who know better and who want to make a difference and save not just the trees or the bees, but us all from ourselves. and bound by laws and the fear of the outcome of taking things into our own hands and simple lack of ability to make the first stand , or resources to bring people together we continue to go about our same old business and hope that someone else will do something about it. well it's not going to happen by talking about it. it starts with us all. and although we may not be able to protest cell phone towers and although we may get taken out of peaceful forest protests by swat teams armed to the teeth. we might be able to just pretend alittle bit longer that it's not our fault. decide whats more important people, and don't be afraid of what people will think of you when you speak what you believe. saving the planet should have started years ago. lets not wait untill its really too late.
Humans the new "drones"
[info]independent_n1 wrote:
Monday, 5 October 2009 at 11:31 am (UTC)
let alone their damage on our brains. In my opinion, cell phones restrict the meaningful interaction between people and make them even more apathetic.
[info]karennow wrote:
Monday, 5 October 2009 at 03:54 pm (UTC)
Are parents responding to this article about Mobile Phones dyou you think?
Oh no, not again!
[info]mightydrunken wrote:
Friday, 9 October 2009 at 03:52 pm (UTC)
Oh my God, it's annoying how people get into an echo chamber of their own ideas and don't actually look at all the evidence. Lets see what Dr Kuhn has to say about his own study!

"DECT and GSM (for mobile phones) use a number of different frequencies and a number of different modulation- and pulse-processes," Kuhn says. "We still don't know whether these (signals) have even a potential effect on bees. And, if they do, we don't know which ones."

Why would he say that? Because the study was NOT about the mobile in your pocket but they were using a home wireless phone. So the Telegraph article has already got it completely wrong!

What was the purpose of the study then?
"Our intention wasn't to explain the massive bee deaths, which in any case started after our research started," says Kuhn. The pilot studies only looked at the fundamental question of whether high-frequency fields could influence bees' learning behaviour.

They simply got a wireless home phone base station, put it on the maximum setting and left it at the bottom of the hive. Now this is where it gets interesting because I tried to find the original paper and I found two links.

This pdf in English http://www.bienenarchiv.de/forschung/2004_lernprozesse/Electromagnetic%20Exposure_Learning%20Processes.doc.pdf

I quote from the conclusion: "We have observed that the honey bees have touched the sending aerial from the beginning, they did not avoid it. We haven't also been able to recognize a changing behaviour of bees."

Oh, that was not what I was expecting, maybe I got the wrong study. Luckily a similar story to this saying how bad mobile phones were to bees pointed me to another web page:
http://www.bienenarchiv.de/forschung/2003_lernprozesse/lernprozesse.htm

I translated it from German to English to see that Dr Kuhn had to say.
What did the article say about the experiment? Well nothing because it is a theory he proposes that bees may be a good model on the non thermal effects of electromagnetic radiation. He then did the study as the PDF said and found well nothing!


Try pesticides
[info]dbm123 wrote:
Friday, 9 October 2009 at 07:29 pm (UTC)
If you can stop attacking mobile phones for a minute you may find there's a more logical explanation. This link to the Telegraph is a good start.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/6247532/Call-for-research-into-pesticides-blamed-for-vanishing-bees.html

P.S. microwaves have been used for terrestrial tv & radio far longer than mobile phones and yet nobody attacks them.
!!!!!!!!!
[info]pawpii wrote:
Friday, 20 November 2009 at 01:37 am (UTC)
I swear to god i just thought about this 2 days ago. Did anyone labrat experiment some rats, insects and plants to prolongued/powerful radio communcations relays?

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date