Planning proposals to give developers 'environmental offsetting' rights will destroy valuable habitats, say MPs
Tuesday 12 November 2013
The Government has been warned by MPs not to rush into a new system which could give developers “carte blanche” to concrete over valuable habitats for wildlife.
The proposals would allow developers to compensate for the destruction of habitats by creating or enhancing other natural areas, but a cross-party report has found the system does not recognise the full value of the lost sites.
The Environmental Audit Committee said ministers should not press ahead with the scheme in England until pilot projects set up in 2011 had been properly assessed by independent experts.
The committee's Labour chairwoman Joan Walley said: "Biodiversity offsetting could improve the way our planning system accounts for the damage developments do to wildlife, if it is done well.
"But ministers must take great care to get offsetting right or they risk giving developers carte blanche to concrete over important habitats.
"Many witnesses to the inquiry were concerned that the Government's proposal would allow offsetting to be applied to ancient woodland and Sites of Special Scientific Interest. There is a danger that an overly simplistic offsetting system would not protect these long-established eco-systems."
She said the assessment process proposed by the Government was "little more than a 20-minute box-ticking exercise that is simply not adequate to assess a site's year-round biodiversity".
If a wood was examined in winter "it would be easy to overlook many of the migratory birds that may use it as habitat in the summer", she claimed.
The Government set out its proposals for an offsetting scheme in September, but the MPs warned against pressing ahead until the pilot projects had concluded.
The report said: "Arguably offsetting is an admission of failure in that it should only arise after alternative development sites or means of mitigating the environmental loss from development have been considered.
"A decision on the Government's offsetting proposals should not be made at this time. Offsetting pilots were set up in 2011 and these should be allowed to run their course and then be subjected to the independent evaluation previously promised by ministers.
"If that evaluation concludes that there are benefits in introducing an offsetting scheme, the Government should then bring forward revised proposals that reflect the concerns that we have raised in this report."
The top 10 weirdest animal mating rituals
The ugliest animals on earth: Blobfish, axolotl and proboscis monkey battle it out to be named least attractive beast
Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past
A spotter's guide to a wild orchid summer
El Nino weather phenomenon will strike this year, Met Office warns
- 1 Howard Jacobson: Let's see the 'criticism' of Israel for what it really is
- 3 Do you know this man? Amnesia sufferer found in park pleads for help in identifying who he is
- 4 PornHub begs users to stop uploading video clips of Brazil getting beaten 7-1
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
British jihadist calls for 'flag of Islam' over Downing Street and Buckingham Palace
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
There’s a nasty smell in the political air – and it’s coming from the Tories
competitive: Progressive Recruitment: SAP SD OTC Consultant | 12 Months | 500/...
£35000 - £40000 per annum + substantial benefits: Ashdown Group: Business Syst...
£40000 - £55000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: Campaign Man...
£40000 - £45000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A Global Financial Service Organ...