Planning proposals to give developers 'environmental offsetting' rights will destroy valuable habitats, say MPs
Tuesday 12 November 2013
The Government has been warned by MPs not to rush into a new system which could give developers “carte blanche” to concrete over valuable habitats for wildlife.
The proposals would allow developers to compensate for the destruction of habitats by creating or enhancing other natural areas, but a cross-party report has found the system does not recognise the full value of the lost sites.
The Environmental Audit Committee said ministers should not press ahead with the scheme in England until pilot projects set up in 2011 had been properly assessed by independent experts.
The committee's Labour chairwoman Joan Walley said: "Biodiversity offsetting could improve the way our planning system accounts for the damage developments do to wildlife, if it is done well.
"But ministers must take great care to get offsetting right or they risk giving developers carte blanche to concrete over important habitats.
"Many witnesses to the inquiry were concerned that the Government's proposal would allow offsetting to be applied to ancient woodland and Sites of Special Scientific Interest. There is a danger that an overly simplistic offsetting system would not protect these long-established eco-systems."
She said the assessment process proposed by the Government was "little more than a 20-minute box-ticking exercise that is simply not adequate to assess a site's year-round biodiversity".
If a wood was examined in winter "it would be easy to overlook many of the migratory birds that may use it as habitat in the summer", she claimed.
The Government set out its proposals for an offsetting scheme in September, but the MPs warned against pressing ahead until the pilot projects had concluded.
The report said: "Arguably offsetting is an admission of failure in that it should only arise after alternative development sites or means of mitigating the environmental loss from development have been considered.
"A decision on the Government's offsetting proposals should not be made at this time. Offsetting pilots were set up in 2011 and these should be allowed to run their course and then be subjected to the independent evaluation previously promised by ministers.
"If that evaluation concludes that there are benefits in introducing an offsetting scheme, the Government should then bring forward revised proposals that reflect the concerns that we have raised in this report."
- 1 Kylie Jenner challenge: Bizarre lip suction device inspired by Kardashian sister goes viral
- 2 Rarest Beanie Baby bought for just £10 at car boot sale could be sold for £62,500 on eBay
- 3 Katie Hopkins and The Sun editor are reported to police for incitement to racial hatred following migrant boat column
- 4 Bruce Forsyth backs assisted dying campaign: 'If I had Alzheimer's or dementia I would do something about it'
- 5 Giorgio Armani criticises the way some gay men dress saying 'a man has to be a man'
If I’m being racially abused I don’t need a stranger with a saviour complex to rescue me
The only black face in the Ukip manifesto is on the page about overseas aid
Ukip is the only main political party to not address LGBT rights in its manifesto
Food banks: One million Britons will soon be using them, according to Trussell Trust
Religion isn't growing, it is becoming vigorous in its demise, says philosopher AC Grayling
BBC election debate: The one photo that summed up the whole 90-minute leaders debate
£14000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An Office Administrator is requ...
£12000 - £40000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Due to expansion and growth of ...
£40000 - £50000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Senior PHP Developer position with a...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: An Operations Leader is required to join a lea...