Nuclear waste should be 'entombed', say experts
Tuesday 01 August 2006
Latest in Environment
On Facebook
Britain's stockpile of 470,000 cubic metres of nuclear waste - enough to fill the Albert Hall five times - should be "entombed" in deep underground silos, a committee advised the Government yesterday.
But the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management warned Tony Blair that it its report should not be regarded as a "green light" to build a new generation of 10 nuclear power plants.
Experts estimated it would cost at least £10bn to build the silos up to a kilometre deep underground.
The committee said that the waste dumps should not be imposed on communities. But it admitted that fears of nuclear catastrophes from accidents or terrorism could make it impossible to find areas willing to take the stockpiles.
It urged the Government to immediately embark on sorting out parts of Britain that would be unsuitable for underground nuclear silos either because of the geology or nearby towns.
Ministers should adopt a system used in Finland and Sweden to encourage communities to volunteer to take the waste, the committee said. Under the scheme, communities would be offered cash to improve their facilities, but Professor Gordon MacKerron, the group chairman, denied it would amount to "buying them".
Some committee members have privately said giving communities the veto over storage silos would create tensions over the Government's plans to streamline planning regulations.
The committee refused to name potential sites but existing plants, led by Sellafield, where 92 per cent of Britain's highly radioactive waste is stored, are likely to top the Government's list.
Greenpeace warned last night there was "no solution to nuclear waste". It said that the UK should not create more nuclear waste by building a new generation of nuclear power stations.
David Ball, of Middlesex University, who resigned from the committee, said its findings were based on opinions rather than science. "The CoRWM experience has been the antithesis of good decision making, having been infused throughout with political, commercial and self interests," he said.
- 1 Lioness kills zoo keeper at South African farm
- 2 Sellafield faces nuclear option as overspending threatens plant's future
- 3 10 best hiking boots
- 4 GM food banned in Monsanto canteen
- 5 Sea lions: not big Shakira fans
- 6 The world's rubbish dump: a tip that stretches from Hawaii to Japan
- 7 Animal Extinction - the greatest threat to mankind
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British




Comments