Keep in touch
Follow the i journalists on our Twitter list
Subscribe to the i print edition - or on iPad
i is available on PRINT subscription or on our iPAD APP at just £45 for twelve months
Today's letter from the Editor
Today's Matrices
iJobs General
SAP SD Consultant
£475 - £476 per day + negotiable: Progressive Recruitment: SAP SD Contract Con...
Maths Teacher- Reading
Negotiable: Randstad Education Reading: Our client in Sonning Common, is looki...
Science Teacher- Reading
Negotiable: Randstad Education Reading: Our client in Sonning Common, is looki...
Special Needs Teacher in Lewisham South London
£27000 - £55000 per annum: Randstad Education London: Supply special education...
i Editor's Letter: Does Armstrong's admission of “cheating” negate this extraordinary charitable achievement?
Who remembers Happy Days? The fabulous 1970s American comedy series starred Henry Winkler as one of television’s immortal characters, Arthur Fonzarelli, the drop-out biker with a heart of gold. “The Fonz” had a big problem with apologising. His “S-s-s-s-s-so-sooorrry” became a running joke.
Lance Armstrong’s belated admission to Oprah Winfrey that he doped recalled the Fonz. Rarely has a man appeared less comfortable apologising than he did. Despite a post-cancer career of doping that has destroyed his reputation, brought down colleagues and tarnished a sport, Armstrong seemed less concerned with making amends and more focused on spreading the blame: everyone was at it!
The repercussions of this are discussed elsewhere. I want to ask a much more basic question: can he redeem himself? Will we all forgive someone who not only doped but sued the hell out of anyone who had the temerity to say he doped; someone who lived the “one big lie” and covered it up aggressively for so long? Is Armstrong, like any lesser-known person who has committed worse crimes, due Christian (or any other) forgiveness? Does everyone really deserve a second chance? Even those who have shirked so many opportunities to recant?
He has no future in sport. But charity? His Livestrong campaign has raised $500m (£315m) since 1997 and is still “strong”. Armstrong is not the monstrous Jimmy Savile. He was not abusing the very people he purported to help. Does the admission of “cheating” negate this extraordinary charitable achievement? Who are we to say it does? His is one of the saddest of falls from grace. Yet another hero with feet of clay. But, somehow, I feel not all is lost. What about you?
- 1 Austerity has hardened the nation's heart
- 2 Tottenham to smash pay scale with £150,000-a-week contract in attempt to tie Gareth Bale to club
- 3 Strewth mate. Aussies wave goodbye to Britain as it becomes too pricey to stay
- 4 Be more professional! GCHQ staff rapped as WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange reveals messages that he says point to 'fit up'
- 5 Join Ryanair! See the world! But we'll only pay you for nine months a year
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
The price of pacifism
Jason Isaacs: Groupies, theatre bores and James Bond
Sealand: 'Micronation' or illegal fortress?
Legend of James Hunt has set Hollywood hearts racing
Macklemore: 'I don't have moderation'

