Fashion

Rain (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Lagerfeld: 'No one wants to look at fat women'

Source: The New Zealand Herald

German designer Karl Lagerfeld has waded into the debate on too-thin models, telling a German publication that no one wants to look at chubby women on the runway.

His comments come a week after popular German women's magazine Brigitte announced it would no longer use professional models for its photo shoots.

"Fat mummies sit there in front of the television with their chip packets and say skinny models are ugly," Lagerfeld told Focus magazine in an interview published yesterday.

The world of beautiful clothes was ultimately about "dreams and illusions", he added, and no one really wanted to see overweight women.

Andreas Lebert, Brigitte's editor-in-chief, told the Guardian last week that the magazine would stop using professional models next year because he was "fed up" with having to retouch photos of underweight models to make them appear fatter.

The magazine would instead use images of "real life" women, who Lebert hoped would come from all walks of life.

"We're looking for women who have their own identity, whether it be the 18-year-old A-level student, the company chairwoman, the musician, or the footballer," he said.

Lagerfeld is not the only person to have spoken out in defence of the modelling industry.

German designer John Ribbe told Focus the controversy over stick-thin models on catwalks and in fashion magazines was nothing but hysteria.

"Ninety per cent [of the models] are totally normal, well-proportioned girls - with less fat and more muscles, who also eat pizza and burgers," he said.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Take care
[info]bobbellinhell wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 09:31 am (UTC)
A racist knows that he'll never turn black, but someone who hates fat people can't be sure that he'll always be thin.
Re: Take care
[info]steveips wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 11:55 am (UTC)
No, I can't be sure but what I am sure of is that I'll do what I can to prevent myself becoming a repulsive pig.
Re: Take care
[info]steveips wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 11:58 am (UTC)
Yes, we can't be sure we may eventually become fat but one thing is for sure, I'll look after myself, eat the right food and do my most to prevent myself becoming a repulsive, fat pig.

Being fat and obese is completely preventable.
Re: Take care
[info]hywelthomas wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 04:20 pm (UTC)
Yes. I'ts completely preventable, but I'm going to assume that you've never been fat, and don't have a fucking clue about how difficult it is to control being overweight for a person who tends to be.

For anyone who might want to lose weight, I suggest the fabulously sensible, and completely free book : The Hacker's Diet. It doesn't pretend to make losing weight easy, but it does give some tools for measuring real progress, rather than what the scales say.

http://www.fourmilab.ch/hackdiet/www/hackdiet.html

It's working for me.

Way to go though. Engourage people to take responsibility by calling them repulsive fat pigs. *shakes head*


Re: Take care
[info]steveips wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 05:45 pm (UTC)
Losing weight isn't difficult.

It's funny, all the fat people I see are often carrying crap food and no exercise. It's about lifestyle and our British lifestyle that sees so much alcohol consumption (and sugary drinks such as alcopops) doesn't help those lazy people who do no exercise.

Get to the gym. Get on a bike. Get your heart rate working in the cardio zone 3 or 4 times a week. Get some muscle and control your food intake as well as type. Calories in must be less than calories out. It really is that easy.

I'm sick of hearing excuses of fat people and in the end, they are going to cost me plenty in health care costs whilst I pay for a gym membership and will likely not call upon the NHS as much as the fat.
Re: Take care
[info]hywelthomas wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 11:09 pm (UTC)
Smokers are cheapest - they die soonest and fairly quickly, and they've more than paid for their treatment with the tax they pay on their tabs. Next are the obese, with heart problems, diabetes etc which also claims them young. Both categories are expensive, but just for a short time. It's the 'healthy' people who cost most, suffering from with dementia and incontinence and lingering for decades in care homes.

You're not thin through your iron will, you're just kidding yourself that you're superior. In fact, you're simply lucky to have never fallen into a fat/obese trap that is a complete bastard to get out of. Maintaining a weight is fairly easy. Gaining weight is easy for some. Losing weight is very difficult for most. Not in terms of calories in, calories out. Not logically. I mean in terms of defying the signals one's body is sending. The body is saying 'eat' - especially if you're exercising too.

BTW exercise for weight loss (burning calories) doesn't really work. Exercising for fitness, to build muscle and raise metabolism is a good thing. 4 hours of the kind of exercise a obese person is capable of burns less than a pound. For the obese, it's better to disassociate the two otherwise exercise becomes a punishment rather than a pleasure.
Re: Take care
[info]steveips wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 05:49 pm (UTC)
And lets not forget the weak will that fat people have and tendency to give up so easily and quickly.
I'd like to see proof.
[info]mark_skohp wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC)
"The world of beautiful clothes was ultimately about "dreams and illusions", he added, and no one really wanted to see overweight women".

I'm not too sure about how true that really is, there's plenty of specialist websites out there that cater for people that ACTUALLY like overweight women.
[info]bemused2 wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 01:28 pm (UTC)
Women: "No one wants to listen to Karl Lagerfeld"
The real world
[info]thefluffychook wrote:
Tuesday, 13 October 2009 at 08:00 am (UTC)
How dare you generalise about who would like to see big women on the catwalk. How about spending some time in the real world. You might not feel so compelled to put normal woman down. You certainly don't help those of us with self esteem issues to be motivated to become something you would look at.
What is "medium"?
[info]greenlady_uk wrote:
Wednesday, 14 October 2009 at 04:07 pm (UTC)
I looked up the Karl Lagerfield collection on the website advert that google showed alongside this article.

(A shame he is so enamoured of "thin" as his "Amanda" dress is quite flattering for the more mature woman, and reasonably priced at £150 for a designer dress).

It's definition of "Medium" is size 12 and size 16 is "large". Now the average woman's dress size in the UK has grown from 12 in 1990s to 14 in 2000 (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/average-dress-size-of-women-increases-to-14-715277.html), but 47% of women are size 16 or more. Karl's clothing is only available up to size "Large". He is therefore ignoring a large proportion of potential sales.

Given scientists have shown that most men who like women prefer a size 14 (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5498375/Men-prefer-average-sized-women-over-fashion-models-and-Playboy-centrefolds-claim-scientists.html) exactly WHO are these "no one"s?

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date