Mary Wakefield: Wikipedia doesn't have all the answers

Fashion

Rain (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C
Popular Topics

Next time Angelina, do check the label

Getty Images

Wrong way round: Angelina Jolie arrives at the 15th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards in Los Angeles Wrong way round: Angelina Jolie arrives at the 15th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards in Los Angeles

« Back to Next time Angelina, do check the label

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

( Leave a comment )
Snore
[info]comradekaff wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 06:51 am (UTC)
Snore. I'd hoped the label had something to do with labels on a tin - as such I was genuinely intrigued, not any more.
| Reply | Thread
omg
[info]jimmyjitt wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 07:52 am (UTC)
Help! i've just realised that i've been wearing my beanie backwards. Do you think anybody has noticed, no-one has said anything. But should i continue to wear it this way and pretend it was 'my style,man', or should i turn it round and hope that no-one notices. This is so embarrassing.
| Reply | Thread
Oh dear!
[info]the_kegs wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 08:22 am (UTC)
If you woke up next to these tattoos after a night on the town, you'd think you'd been pulled by bloke.
| Reply | Thread
Re: Oh dear!
[info]schmice wrote:
Tuesday, 3 February 2009 at 05:13 am (UTC)
well said.
| Reply | Parent | Thread
Woman wears dress
[info]iain39 wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 09:36 am (UTC)
Today a little over 21,000 children will die from starvation or preventable diseases. But never mind about that now! Apparently a woman has worn a dress!!
| Reply | Thread
Re: Woman wears dress
[info]sara_sense wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 10:10 am (UTC)
I know, big news right? Whether anyone like Jolie or not, she does a lot to raise awareness for several causes throughout the world with the UNHCR, She's been on missions to refugee camps, donated money, is a goodwill ambassedor etc etc and yet this is the thing in her life that catches people's eye? Oh I despair!
| Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Woman wears dress
[info]fellie83 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 February 2009 at 05:19 pm (UTC)
yes, but she's not only worn a dress but POTENTIALLY worn it back to front!

yawn yawn - has this paper turned into Heat magazine, please .....
| Reply | Parent | Thread
Yawn
[info]peersrogue wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 10:36 am (UTC)
Pampoered star may have worn dress backwards - wish I could say it raised a smile or lightened the day. It didn't.
| Reply | Thread
[info]vgnwtch wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC)
Looks like she did check the label and made the sensible decision to wear it so that it would actually look good.
| Reply | Thread
The Arizona Law.
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 11:56 am (UTC)
Don't know whether to look at her or read her.If she ever wants to audition for "Cape Fear" she should pass.
| Reply | Thread
Sub-species.
[info]archibald_knox wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 01:32 pm (UTC)
It's amazing how dim these celebrities can be. A fantastic flawless body and she lets some talentless jerk with a needle and ink cover it in permanent scribbles.

Fashionable? trendy? edgy? cool?

No, she has just voluntarily joined the sub-species of celebrity who advertise to the world that they have no class.
| Reply | Thread
Re: Sub-species.
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 01:51 pm (UTC)
Nothing wrong with tattoos but I bet she regrets "Billy Bob" as she divorced him.
| Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Sub-species.
[info]caladan58 wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 10:47 pm (UTC)
I remember a Tracey Ullman funny. She's playing a divorced tatooed remarried mother of 8 kids. She says " I had my tatoo changed from 'This is Dave's bitch' to 'this is Jason's bitch' because Jason is much classier name."
| Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Sub-species.
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 10:06 am (UTC)
I had to explain ACAB/ASAB to a pal yesterday.Sigh.Some folks have sheltered lives!
| Reply | Parent | Thread
Angie's dress
[info]val_camps wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 06:38 pm (UTC)
C'mon!!! If you had 6 kids between 10 and 0...wouldn't you be wearing your clothes back to front?? ;) Angie is a goddess, even if she had goo on her dress's shoulder or bags under her eyes (which she hasn't).
Cheers!
| Reply | Thread
from a mum of twins....
[info]sugarmagnolia53 wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 05:16 am (UTC)
Ok...she wanted a blousen look to cover up her tummy....believe me, I know what that's all about.
=)
| Reply | Thread
Angelina Jolie
[info]tinkerstewart wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 07:37 am (UTC)
What kind of witless nit bothers to diss
an actress' clothing? Better do something
more memorable
| Reply | Thread
Angelina Jolie
[info]tinkerstewart wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 07:37 am (UTC)
What kind of witless nit bothers to diss
an actress' clothing? Better do something
more memorable
| Reply | Thread
pathetic
[info]teddave wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 11:12 am (UTC)
youre supposed to be a bloody newspaper.
| Reply | Thread
Tats
[info]bundubasher wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 12:34 pm (UTC)
I imagine, not that it is important in any shape manner or form, she did it deliberately in order to show off the back tattoos.Though quite why anyone treats their skin as a comic book I have no idea as it is seriously vile.
However she is a good person with a humanitarian conscience unlike most of them who are all narcissistic shopaholics out of boredom.

Moving on to more relevant "news"......
| Reply | Thread
Next time Angelina
[info]catseyes100 wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 01:04 pm (UTC)
The purpose?????
| Reply | Thread
[info]thewhiteowl wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 04:41 pm (UTC)
If she'd worn it the other way round, the cleavage would have reached her navel.
| Reply | Thread
a disgrace
[info]ebbi581 wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 05:18 pm (UTC)
a disgrace that while millions are going hungry and homeless some of us are still busy with these low lives.
| Reply | Thread
Whatever
[info]azariafan wrote:
Sunday, 1 February 2009 at 04:49 am (UTC)
For a newspaper you don't really do much research do you? Most of Max Azaria's clothes are designed to be worn multiple ways. I own several dresses and tops that can be worn back to front or vise-versa (often with one side plunging and the other with a demure neckline) by him. He's an ingenious designer who focuses on versatility. Ms. Jolie's gown was probably intended to be worn either way.
| Reply | Thread
Yawn! Yawn! Yawn!
[info]christelfer wrote:
Sunday, 1 February 2009 at 11:55 am (UTC)
....Yawn! Yawn! Yawn! I thought this was meant to be a serious newspaper....
| Reply | Thread
Acutally...
[info]robynne_hood wrote:
Sunday, 1 February 2009 at 06:25 pm (UTC)
The way she wears it is better
| Reply | Thread
Re: Acutally...
[info]johnbonar wrote:
Monday, 2 February 2009 at 05:29 pm (UTC)
Actually
If the dress was turned around, and the zip at the same level, then her boobs would be all out.
| Reply | Parent | Thread
Beware of that dress, ladies...
[info]j2thaizzo2 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 February 2009 at 11:33 pm (UTC)
it WILL steal your man!
| Reply | Thread
Angelina Dress
[info]albiravi wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 07:32 am (UTC)
Well it doesn't matter how she wore the dress it still looks pretty on her and infact I guess she has worn the right way and model had worn it the wrong way.
| Reply | Thread
Angie J..true artist
[info]cinnamonee wrote:
Monday, 16 February 2009 at 11:16 am (UTC)
I for one congratulate Angie J for her chosen attire..it looks good whether it was by fluke or she planned to wear it so. and like a true 'artist' she chooses not to retaliate by 'dissing' those that ridiculed the way she dressed, unlike today's so called 'celebrities' who get off on media attention and pull stunts like these to attract media attention for a week until the go back to their shelf life and plot another stunt or two!

and as for this being a newspapercan i just remind everyone that you are in the fashion section of the paper, so if you want 'real' news..you'll find them in the section headed NEWS..you really can't miss it.
| Reply | Thread
Ms Jolie..Good for you!
[info]cinnamonee wrote:
Monday, 16 February 2009 at 11:22 am (UTC)
I for one congratulate Angie J for her chosen attire..it looks good whether it was by fluke or she planned to wear it so. and like a true 'artist' she chooses not to retaliate by 'dissing' those that ridiculed the way she dressed, unlike today's so called 'celebrities' who get off on media attention and pull stunts like these to attract media attention for a week until the go back to their shelf life and plot another stunt or two!

and as for this being a newspaper and not writing these stories can i just remind everyone that you are in the fashion section of the paper, so if you want 'real' news..you'll find them in the section headed NEWS..you really can't miss it.
| Reply | Thread
Subtle form of self-harm?
[info]kristinaeri wrote:
Thursday, 19 March 2009 at 01:09 pm (UTC)
Why do personality disordered folks like tatoos and piercings more than the average person? Is it a subtle way of self-harming or wating to have signs of Specialness? (I'm not saying that there is anything wrong with tatoos/piercings generally), but I've noticed this working with PDs,. Especially Borderlines (Jolie) seem prone to this...
| Reply | Thread
Label
[info]catfishspy wrote:
Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 10:46 am (UTC)
Those tattos are cool, as for the label printers well thats "bizarre" and "unflattering".
| Reply | Thread

Fashion Catalogues

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date