Food & Drink

11° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Fat is back: Rediscover the delights of lard, dripping and suet

By Sophie Morris

Fatty dishes such as duck rillettes do have health benefits

Fatty dishes such as duck rillettes do have health benefits

'I love fat," begins Jennifer McLagan's new cookery book. This three-letter short, squat word – fat – strikes fear into the hearts of most people across the developed world, but McLagan is unrepentant in her praise of the much maligned foodstuff. "Whether it's a slice of foie gras terrine, its layer of yellow fat melting at the edges; rich, soft marrow scooped hot from the bone; French butter from Normandy, redolent of herbs, flowers, and cream; hot bacon fat, spiked with vinegar, wilting a plate of pungent greens into submission; a slice or two of fine ham eaten just as its fat begins to turn translucent from the warmth of the room, sweet, nutty, and salty all at once; or a piece of crunchy pork crackling, delicious either hot or cold. I love fat: I love the way it feels in my mouth, and I love its many tastes."

Obsessions with size zero aside, pretty much anyone born in the UK and North America over the past 50 years has grown up with the mantra of low-fat or no-fat drilled into them until the cows come home (and have their milk pumped out of them, stripped of its goodness and decanted into plastic bottles of watery skimmed white liquid). But McLagan, a chef and food stylist based in Canada, grew up in suburban Australia in the 1960s when real fat had not yet been demonised. She remembers a fridge always stocked with butter, lard and dripping, and jaunts to the fish and chip shop for chunks of battered shark cooked in tallow.

McLagan escaped to Europe in the 1970s. "When my mother was deviating from the righteous path to margarine, I was in France where there was duck and pork fat, so I kept on eating and cooking with fat," she says. Fat: An Appreciation of a Misunderstood Ingredient, with Recipes is much more than a cookery book. McLagan explains and debunks the received wisdom about how bad fat is for us, and serves up her recipes for salted butter tart, salt pork and lentils, crackling brittle and Spanish-style lard cookies with palate cleansers of historic, literary and folkloric fat facts, such as Joseph Beuys' sculptural work with malleable fat, Somerset Maugham's predilection for a good English breakfast three times a day, and the ancient Tibetan Festival of the Butter, where 10ft statues of Buddhist gods are expertly carved out of yak butter.

One expects a good chef to know the merits of a chunk of fat, but McLagan is crazy about the stuff. So enamoured is she of caul, the lacy membrane of fat that holds a pig's intestines together, she wishes someone would make her a dress out of it.

When she started hawking her idea of a cookery book that celebrated not only the merits of cooking with fat but also the health benefits, not everyone was quite so enthusiastic. "People hated the idea," she remembers. "They thought it was disgusting, especially in New York City."

Chefs have always made their food sing with dollops of butter and lashings of cream, but McLagan's voice joins a growing group of influential foodies, nutritionists and scientists who believe the foundations of the current obesity and diabetes epidemic sweeping through the developed world lie with the promotion of starchy, sugary foods over the animal fats that have sustained us for millennia.

The idea that eating a diet high in saturated fat clogs up the arteries and leads to heart disease is based on two weak reports, whose findings have instructed the Western diet for the past 50 years and led to our dependence on carbohydrates and fear of fat. The first report, from 1950, revealed that rabbits fed on a cholesterol-rich diet end up with furry arteries. Yet rabbits are designed to eat only plant life. So it should have been no surprise they reacted strangely to a radically new diet. The second study was published in 1953 by the American researcher Ansel Keyes, who made the link between fat and heart disease. He discovered an upwards curve in incidences of heart disease in six countries, starting with Japan, where people consume very little fat, through to the United States where a rampant consumption of fat seemed to correlate with a hike in cases of coronary illness. Keyes conveniently ignored data from 16 countries that did not suit his hypothesis, including crucial research on French and Inuit people, which showed they ate large quantities of fat and rarely suffered from heart disease. A fascination with the Mediterranean diet ensued and, although Keyes' work has since been largely discredited, our enthusiasm for fruits, cereals and vegetable oils has remained.

The American National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute has found no link between diet and heart disease. In 2003, Professor Sylvan Lee Weinberg, a former president of the American College of Cardiology, said there was no longer any defence for a low-fat, high-carb diet. A 2008 report in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine actually pointed the finger at US dietary guidelines for the rise in obesity. "Ironically, it now seems that the US dietary guidelines recommending fat restriction might have worsened rather than helped the obesity epidemic," concluded the report, by Marantz, Bird and Alderman.

Not only is fat not bad for you, it has lots of properties essential to our wellbeing. "You need fat to absorb certain vitamins," explains McLagan. "It is full of stuff that boosts your immune system and is connected to your hormones."

Fat also tastes delicious, something we have forgotten with the passing of time and our dalliances with polyunsaturated margarine, sunflower oil and skinny lattes. "We have sacrificed all that taste and pleasure," says McLagan, "yet we haven't lost weight or improved our health." She is not advocating you snack on her bacon fat spice cookies throughout the day, but firmly believes that three meals that include proper fat will keep restless fingers out of the biscuit tin.

McLagan is not immune to our fear of fat. Faced with a slab of pork belly, even she hears that voice in her head wondering if it will make her fat. But she knows that starving herself and restricting her diet is the only sure-fire way to put on weight. "The main reason I wrote the book," she says, "is that fat is flavour. Everybody has to eat and you might as well eat tasty, satisfying food."

McLagan points out that we are not only frightened of eating butter, lard, suet and dripping, but also fearful of the pleasure that indulgence brings. You'll have to pass on the Ryvita and abandon yourself to McLagan's chicken liver spread and brown butter ice cream to find out if she's right.

On the menu? Know your fats

Butter: Mainly saturated fat, which should be refrigerated and well wrapped to protect it from light and absorbing strong smells. Humans have been eating butter for more than 10,000 years.

Lard: Real lard is hard to find, so terrified are we of the creamy rendered pig fat. Foods fried in lard become very crisp and absorb less fat than foods cooked in oil, and it makes great flaky dough.

Lardo: Lardo is an Italian delicacy that is enjoying a renaissance. It is cured pork back fat that has been aged for long periods in a cellar. Eat thin, seasoned slices on toast or use to flavour pasta or rice.

Dripping: This is the fat that drips from meat while it cooks. Beef dripping is the most popular. Brown beef or lamb in their own dripping and the flavour will intensify.

Suet: This fat surrounds an animal's kidneys and is rarely found any more. It is a hard fat with a high melting point so great for deep-frying and making pastry. Grate it into your mincemeat and dumpling mixes.

Tallow: A general term for fat rendered from cows or sheep, best known as an ingredient for candles and soap. Save some for your roast potatoes and Yorkshire puddings.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

No more fat phobia..
[info]deeflymaster wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 09:19 am (UTC)
Fantastic, at last someone who isn't afraid to embrace saturated fat. She still has niggles, but this is the brainwashing and conditioning of the media and 'experts' telling her she will get fat if she eats fat tugging at the back of her mind, good news, you wont, IF you restrict the amount of carbohydrates you eat. Without carbs fat cannot be stored as fat but without fat carbs will be stored as fat. Seems odd, but this is how the body works. Enjoy and embrace fat -proper fat that is not polyunsaturated veg oils, trans fats, hydrogenated fats, fake fats, rancid fats or damaged processed oils - and enjoy the health benefits they bring. Just remember fats and protein are essential to life, carbohydrate is not. There are lots of fat/protein deficiency diseases, there is not one carbohydrate deficience disease, actual dietary requirement for carbs is NONE, that's it ZERO.

The studies by Ancel Keys have been refuted time and again, and again, and again. Eventually even he admitted he was wrong and that saturated fat was healthful and polyunsaturated fats weren't. But it was too late then, eveyone latched onto the sat fat is bad mantra, especially the veg oil producers and no-one has had the cajonas to admit that it was wrong. But the tide is slowly turning. Dr Atkins was right, as is Dr Mary Enig, Dr Mary Vernon, Drs Mike and Mary Dan Eades, Dr Charles Clark, Dr Barry Groves, Dr Al Sears, Dr Al Davis and Dr Annika Dahlqvist. They have seen the light, isn't it time the Health Advisors in this country admitted their health advice is wrong and that more, not less saturated fat is healthful and that less not more carbohydrate is the answer to the obesity and diabetes epidemic.
The liars
[info]brainbiter wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 04:11 pm (UTC)
The 'fat is bad for you' lie was promulgated by the World Health Organization. This was a prelude to wrecking our livestock industry (it's far more expensive to raise animals for consumption than grain, and living on rice makes us more competitive with China economically). The details of the deception are laid out in James Le Fanu's 'Eat Your Heart Out', published around 1990.
Fat for skinny's sake
[info]sparkozy wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 04:20 pm (UTC)
Until I reached the age of 40-ish I was a beanpole. My favourite foods were the likes of pork pie, greasy breakfasts, crisps, fish n chips. In the past 5 years I've come to look more like my avatar, that's since I started eating more veggies. What's that all about? Maybe just an unavoidable middle-age spread.
test
[info]steveparkermd wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 05:33 pm (UTC)
more in a minute
Not so fast . . .
[info]steveparkermd wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 05:42 pm (UTC)
The US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Insitute still recommends a low-fat diet for prevention of heart disease (heart attacks), in contrast to what is writtten above. Read it for yourself at the NHLBI website:
http://tinyurl.com/7p3lnp

[I'm new to tinyurl, so I hope it works]

Ancel Keys is famous for his Seven Countries Study, not six.

Ms. McLagan "knows that starving herself and restricting her diet is the only sure-fire way to put on weight."? What about those millions of people trapped in the Nazi concentration camps and Soviet Gulags? Guess their metabolisms are different from McLagan's.

I'll entertain the possibility that the Diet-Heart Hypothesis is wrong, but let's argue from facts.

-Steve Parker, M.D.
http://AdvancedMediterraneanDiet.com/blog/


Re: Not so fast . . .
[info]joss75321 wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 06:49 pm (UTC)
> http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/features/fat-is-back-rediscover-the-delights-of-lard-dripping-and-suet-1642912.html

Not only violating Godwin but deliberately obtuse. Everyone knows that not eating makes you thinner, but it also messes with your metabolism and the way you think about food so when you stop restricting your diet you are more likely to become obese.
Re: Not so fast . . .
[info]steveparkermd wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 07:37 pm (UTC)
I forget . . . who's Godwin?
Fat
[info]inakachick wrote:
Friday, 13 March 2009 at 12:02 am (UTC)
I feel this article is deeply misleading, there are plenty of studies linking saturated fat intake with cholesterol levels and CHD. Specifically the proportion of long chain saturated fats to polyunsaturated fats

These are the first 2 I found in my searching only one journal.

http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/57/5/634?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&minscore=5000&resourcetype=HWCIT

http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/70/6/1001?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&minscore=5000&resourcetype=HWCIT


"The ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fat was strongly and inversely associated with CHD risk (multivariate RR for a comparison of the highest with the lowest deciles: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.83; P for trend < 0.0001). Conversely, higher ratios of red meat to poultry and fish consumption and of high-fat to low-fat dairy consumption were associated with significantly greater risk"
Taken from abstract of above link.

I feel this article is poorly researched as there is clear evidence for increasing unsaturated fatty acids (I'm amused that Omega 3 fatty acids are advertised as Omega-3 to avoid the negative connotations of 'fatty') being linked with reduced LDL cholesterol and CHD. Incidently explaining why the Inuit community has low incidence of CHD due to its high intake of unsaturated fatty acids from oily fish. Not all fats are the same, but encouraging consumption of saturated fats is negligent. There is not a global conspiracy to fool the public into eating the wrong food. Real experts are experts because they have researched the field and have the time and skills to understand the information available - there are no absolute answers in science but if you took the time to read the studies available you would come up with same conclusion.
Re: Fat
[info]deeflymaster wrote:
Saturday, 14 March 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC)
Correct, all fats are not created equal but some heal and others kill - slowly but surely. It is not negligent to advise consumption of natural saturated fats like butter, lard and coconut oil and some naturally occuring PUFA like fish omega 3 and flax seed but where the real negligence occurs in the recommendation that we eat vegetable oils that contain far too much omega 6. All the studies that show that saturated fat cause heart disease were carried out using diets in which the fat is COMBINED with carbohydrates, in studies when the carbohydrates are severely restricted or eliminated no heart disease occurs unless the fat involved is vegetable oil. Cholesterol levels are not relevant to heart disease nor are they raised by saturated fat, quite the opposite, fat eaters (who restrict carbs) have much lower cholesterol levels than carb eaters. This leads to the obvious conclusion that it is the carbs that cause the heart disease, a conclusion which has been born out many many times.

Tuck into our A-to-Z of recipes

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date