Culture: I really couldn't give two tweets
Sunday 15 February 2009
Can you tell anything about the state of our culture by the current vogue for Twitter? For those of you who don't know, Twitter is a social-networking site that enables users to post regular updates about whatever it is they're doing – cooking a meal, playing a video game – or whatever happens to have caught their eye on the web. These messages are called "tweets" and they must be no longer than 140 characters.
One of Twitter's distinguishing characteristics is that each person signed up to the network has to choose which other users' "tweets" they want to see – and deciding to follow somebody does not guarantee that they will follow yours. For example, William Shatner (pictured) has 12,519 followers, but is following only four people.
This built-in discrepancy – which applies across the board – means it is very difficult to have a conversation on Twitter. I can respond to someone else's tweet, but if they're not one of my followers, they won't be aware of this response. It is a bit like trying to attract someone's attention in a crowded room, but being ignored as you're not important enough.
Indeed, the whole Twitter experience is like being at some A- list media event – Matthew Freud and Elisabeth Murdoch's Christmas party, for instance – at which it seems everyone is talking and no one is listening. In this respect, it is a quintessentially modern phenomenon: a social-networking site for people who don't like to communicate.
Twitter is a bit like a malfunctioning two-way radio. I can broadcast to my followers, and I can listen to the broadcasts of the people I'm following, but I can't actually talk to anyone.
Or, rather, I can, but only if they happen to fall into the subset of the people I'm both following and being followed by – and that will nearly always be a small number, thanks to the way Twitter is designed.
In 1995, the Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam published a famous essay entitled "Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital" in which he predicted the emergence of a much more fragmented society, and it is almost as if someone invented Twitter to prove him right. In fact, "bowling alone" is a perfect description of twittering: it's a social activity that involves no human interaction whatsoever.
Life & Style blogs
Versace haute couture review: Beautiful evening dresses are some of the loveliest Donatella has ever created
The face of fertility: why do men find women who are near ovulation more attractive?
What supermodels really think about posing in the nude
People all over the world are getting semicolon tattoos to draw attention to mental health
What do the emojis on Snapchat mean?
More Britons believe that multiculturalism makes the country worse - not better, says poll
Nathan Collier: Montana man inspired by same-sex marriage ruling requests right to wed two wives
Osborne to cap family benefits at £23,000 – announced ahead of his post-election Budget
Greece crisis: IMF was pushed around by Angela Merkel and Nicholas Sarkozy – and now it is being humiliated
Forget little green men – aliens will look like humans, says Cambridge University evolution expert
Girl, 7, stares down hate preacher at Ohio festival with pro-LGBT rainbow flag gesture
- 1 Humans of New York image of crying gay teen receives best response from Ellen DeGeneres
- 2 What supermodels really think about posing in the nude
- 3 People all over the world are getting semicolon tattoos to draw attention to mental health
- 4 Swedish minister gives strongest case yet on why EU should stop turning away asylum seekers
- 5 Chris Moyles reportedly set to make radio comeback with new breakfast show on XFM
iJobs Gadgets & Tech
£30000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This company provides a number ...
£35000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A dynamic, customer oriented Pr...
£30 to £32k : Guru Careers: We are seeking a Trainer / IT Trainer to join an a...
£25000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An exciting, well-funded near s...