International group of Privacy Commissioners challenge Google over Glass
Countries including Canada, Israel and Australia write a letter to Larry Page over privacy concerns for Google Glass
Ten privacy authorities from six countries have written to Google CEO Larry Page with questions addressing privacy concerns over Google Glass.
The letter addresses “concerns about the obvious, and perhaps less obvious, privacy implications of a device that can be worn by an individual and used to film and record audio of other people” with signatories including the Privacy Commissioners of Canada, Australia, Switzerland, Mexico, New Zealand and Israel.
A set of eight key questions are posed in the letter with the stated aim of encouraging Google to “engage in a real dialogue with data protection authorities about Glass.”
These include “What information [collected by Glass] is shared with third parties, including application developers?”, “How does Google intend to use this information?” and how will the company “address the specific issues around facial recognition in the future?”
This last question has been the most recently raised after Google banned facial recognition software on Glass earlier this month. Despite this move, commentators are still concerned. Just as phones can be jailbroken to free them from manufacturer’s restrictions, Glass could be fitted with facial recognition technology by determined and savvy individuals.
The letter stresses that Google’s position as “a leader in this area” and “the first to confront the ethical issues that such a product entails” creates a certain responsibility, but that the company has been somewhat lax in their responses:
“To date, however, most of the data protection authorities listed below have not been approached by your company to discuss any of these issues in detail.”
As Glass is not yet available for sale, Google’s strategy of a slow release for the product seems aimed at addressing the many privacy concerns raised by the letter. Beta versions of Glass (the Glass Explorer Edition) have been released to 2,000 individuals in order for the company to collect feedback and responses.
Although the questions posed by the letter have no easy answers – from Google or from any other company – the hope of the signatories that Google will engage in more open debate in the future is welcome.
Life & Style blogs
Best three-ingredient recipes: From Nutella brownies to mac and cheese and pulled pork
The difference between a psychopath and a sociopath
What do the emojis on Snapchat mean?
The lesser known erogenous zones - and how to find them
Jane Birkin asks Hermès fashion house to rename luxury Birkin bags after animal cruelty concerns
Yvette Cooper: Our choice is years of Tory rule under Jeremy Corbyn – or a return to a Labour government
Labour leadership contender Jeremy Corbyn says 'we can learn a great deal from Karl Marx'
I am the Jeremy Corbyn supporter that many will tell you doesn't exist
Public anger after French sunbather beaten up by gang for wearing a bikini in Reims park
Labour leadership: New poll shows party is now even 'less electable' than under Ed Miliband
Labour leadership contest: I would never quit the party, says Liz Kendall
- 1 Australia to impose 24-hour curfew on all cats to protect endangered species
- 2 The difference between a psychopath and a sociopath
- 3 Black and ethnic minority people twice as likely to be hit by Tory cuts than white people, report finds
- 4 Walter Palmer: Cecil the lion killer revealed to be American dentist
- 5 What TripAdvisor users think of 16 of the world's most popular landmarks
iJobs Gadgets & Tech
£45 - £55k DOE: Guru Careers: A Financial Controller is required to join a suc...
£30000 - £60000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Are you motivated to hit and ex...
£25000 - £60000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Due to continued growth an exce...
£50000 - £65000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A technical SharePoint Consulta...