Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cat fights with record labels for rights to its own purr, after YouTube copyright dispute

Complaint has now been lifted — but not after wrangling by the cat

Andrew Griffin
Thursday 12 February 2015 17:58 GMT
Comments
Grumpy Cat, another cat who has become an internet sensation
Grumpy Cat, another cat who has become an internet sensation

A cat has been locked in a copyright dispute with two of the world’s biggest music rights companies.

The dispute arose after the owner of the cat, who is called Phantom, posted a video of it purring. YouTube’s automatic system for recognising copyright infringement flagged the purr as potentially being stolen — the automated system thought that the sound was owned by EMI Recording and PRS, so the video was locked and no money would be paid to its owner.

The automatic system is similar to that used by YouTube to spot pornographic videos — which also sometimes goes wrong. It emerged this week that porn films had been hidden on the site by using Irish language titles.

YouTube’s system is built to look for evidence of copyright infringement, and stop people making money from uploading other people’s songs and films. The automated program scans videos and matches their soundtracks to existing songs — if they’re too similar to something on its database, it stops uploaders from making money from the posts.

But the process can sometimes go wrong, accidentally flagging posts that aren’t infringing as doing so. That happened when user Digihaven uploaded the video of Phantom the cat, which featured one hour of video loops of the cat purring.

Nearly a year after it went up, Dighaven was told that the sound was infringing copyright, according to TorrentFreak. The video wasn’t taken down, but Digihaven was no longer paid for views on the video.

“I’m sure EMI/PRS made Phantom a sad kitty,” the user told TorrentFreak. “It seems like companies such as EMI are pirating ads on people’s legit videos, so I’m wondering if they apologize to, or reimburse people for those false claims.”

Digihaven filed a dispute. That seems to have worked and EMI has lifted its claim to the video.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in