Judges amazed as Apple requests two-week time-frame to post notice saying it lost its Samsung legal fight
Thursday 01 November 2012
Senior judges today expressed amazement after technology giant Apple suggested it would need two weeks to post a notice on its website.
One judge suggested that Apple chief executive Tim Cook ought to make a statement setting out the "technical difficulty" facing the American firm.
Judges were sitting in the Court of Appeal in London hearing details of a dispute between Apple and rival Samsung.
Apple had been instructed by judges to publish a statement acknowledging that it had lost an earlier legal fight with Samsung.
The two firms returned to court after Samsung complained that the notice Apple posted did not comply with the court order and should be altered.
Apple said the notice did comply.
But judges agreed with Samsung and said Apple should post another statement.
A lawyer representing Apple said the firm could take a notice off its website in 24 hours but asked judges for 14 days to post a replacement.
Lord Justice Longmore told Michael Beloff QC: "We are just amazed that you cannot put the right notice up at the same time as you take the other one down."
And Sir Robin Jacob added: "I would like to see the head of Apple make an affidavit about why that is such a technical difficulty for the Apple company."
He told Mr Beloff: "I don't believe the instructions you have been given. This is Apple that cannot put something on their own website?"
Judges said Apple should post the notice within 48 hours.
They were hearing the latest stage of a legal dispute centred on computer technology produced by Apple and Samsung.
Apple had complained that the Samsung Galaxy Tab was too similar to its iPad.
But a judge at the High Court in London ruled in July that the Samsung Galaxy Tab was not "cool" enough to be confused with Apple's iPad.
In October, Apple failed to overturn that ruling in the Court of Appeal.
Lord Justice Longmore, Lord Justice Kitchin and Sir Robin Jacob upheld a decision by Judge Colin Birss QC, who had concluded that three Samsung Galaxy tablet computers did not infringe Apple's registered design.
Judge Birss had said: "They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."
He had decided that consumers were not likely to get the two tablet computers mixed up.
elephant appealThe first 23 lots in our charity auction have now gone. But there are 22 more still up for grabs
Geoffrey Macnab reviews American Hustle, also starring Christian Bale and Bradley Cooper
Dennis Rodman will coach the North Korea basketball team
Life & Style blogs
The 10 Best Scotch Whiskies
America's 'virgin births'? One in 200 mothers 'became pregnant without having sex'
Why we must save the banana
Best smartphones of 2013: the iPhone 5s, Motorola Moto G, and more than one Nokia
The best tablets of 2013: the Apple iPad Air, the Lumia 2520 and the Tesco Hudl
- 1 America's 'virgin births'? One in 200 mothers 'became pregnant without having sex'
- 2 Sun will 'flip upside down' within weeks, says Nasa
- 3 Christmas comes early: Justin Bieber is 'retiring from music'
- 4 Iain Duncan Smith leaves Commons food banks debate early
- 5 Children evacuated from swimming pool after prosthetic leg mistaken for paedophile
- < Previous
- Next >
iJobs Gadgets & Tech
£500 - £680 per day: Harrington Starr: Murex Business Analyst - 1000 CHF per d...
£35000 - £42000 per annum + excellent company benefits: Pro-Recruitment Group:...
29,800-31,000 GBP: Transcargo Europe Limited: Developing software for sea trad...
£25000 - £28000 Per Annum: Clearwater People Solutions Ltd: 2nd Line Support T...