Coca-Cola urged to change cans and eliminate controversial toxin

Click to follow
Indy Lifestyle Online

The world's largest beverage giant may have to explore packaging alternatives for its canned soft drinks if a group of shareholders get their way on April 27.

Investors with Coca-Cola will be voting on a resolution at the company's annual shareowner's meeting in Atlanta Wednesday about the use of bisphenol-A (BPA) in the lining of their cans.

The shareholder advocacy groups As You Sow, Domini Social Investments and Trillium Asset Management Corporation are requesting that the company publish a report by September 1 of this year outlining a plan to develop alternatives to the use of BPA in can linings.

BPA is used to make polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins.

It is also a hormone disrupter as it mimics estrogen and is commonly found in hard-shelled plastic bottles, milk containers and canned food linings. The coating guards against contamination and extends the shelf life of foods.

Coca-Cola, meanwhile, maintains that the beverage packaging for its products does not pose a public health risk and cites the policies of international regulatory agencies - namely those of Australia, Japan, New Zealand and the US - which maintain that current levels of exposure to BPA are acceptable.

Last year, however, Canada banned BPA, declaring it a toxic substance.

The European Union also voted to ban BPA from baby bottles last year over concerns that the chemical could affect developmental and immune responses in young children - a move that kicked in last month.

Swedish safety agencies have also proposed that it be phased out in food and beverage can linings.