Health & Families

2° London Hi 4°C / Lo -2°C

Are you feelingbroody.com?

Conceiving a child without a partner is not easy, as Seyi Joseph discovered. Her controversial website aims to make the process simpler for other would-be parents who make the decision to go it alone, she tells Rob Sharp

By the time that Seyi Joseph was 26, she was ready to have a child. She had a good job, a nice house, and felt financially secure. There was just one tiny problem: she was single.

Joseph, now 32, had considered adoption but had been turned down because she was too young. So she considered sperm donation. But on arriving at a fertility clinic close to her home in Swanscombe, Kent, she discovered that each treatment cost £1,000 and would only have a 20 per cent success rate. She found a US website that matched potential donors with women who wanted to conceive, and posted her details. But even this failed to achieve results: she got pregnant, but suffered a miscarriage after six weeks.

So she took matters into her own hands. Last September she went ahead and set up a website, feelingbroody.com, that matches sperm donors with potential parents. Already around 500 people have signed up to the service, either offering or seeking sperm.

The British organisation Donor Conception Network, says record numbers of women in their thirties are enquiring about using sperm donors; with a third of 35-year-old women single, sperm donation is more relevant than ever.

"I decided I wanted to do something for those living in Britain who sought a donor and didn't want to pay extortionate fees," explains Joseph. "I wanted a lot more choice in who the donor was, something that simply wasn't offered by the clinic I went to. Turns out there were many other people in the same position." Feeling Broody allows wannabe parents to browse donors' details, such as height, sexual orientation, eye colour and the amount of contact that the donor would like with the child. For a price, users can obtain donors' medical information. The website also has a "fertility store" with home pregnancy test-kits and syringes.

Joseph hopes her service will allow potential parents a greater degree of control – she found that many private clinics insist that the donor should be the same race as the woman receiving the sperm, for example. On the flipside, such a process doesn't offer the same degree of protection as a licensed clinic. There is a nothing to stop a donor who has taken part in an insemination outside a clinic from mounting a legal challenge to gain access to a child.

But so far, so good for Joseph, who is now the proud mother of a 10-month-old boy, Alex. Joseph says most of the men on the website just "want their genes out there". Some want to co-parent – namely, share responsibility for a child without being in a relationship. Some are gay, some are straight, some are doing it without their wives' knowledge, others are anonymous.

"I find that most gay couples want a donor but don't want any contact with the biological father," she says. "I wanted to co-parent because that was important to me. Other women I think can handle it on their own with no support whatsoever. Most of the guys on the website are quite flexible. Not many want to co-parent, but you need to be aware of the financial ramifications. Most don't mind meeting up with the kids. I think very few would want to be totally anonymous. That said, the majority don't want to be involved in the kid's life." As for herself, "I don't know why, but I always wanted children from a very young age," she explains. "I come from a large family – my mother and father both have lots of siblings. I guess it was the way I was made. When I was younger I decided I was well-off enough to do it. I did give relationships a try but when guys figured out that was what I wanted it scared a lot of them off. But I soon realised that I would be comfortable doing it all on my own."

Seeking a sperm donor can often be a difficult experience. It has not been helped by changes in the law. In April 2005 the Government lifted anonymity for egg and sperm donors. Now anyone born by donated sperm, eggs or embryos can obtain identifying information about the donor once they reach the age of 18. This has given the children involved more rights – something many of the children involved were desperate for – but sperm donor numbers have plummeted. In 1996, 417 men registered as sperm donors in the UK. By 2008, that number had nose-dived to 284.

"It was incredibly hard trying to find a donor before I set up my website," says Joseph. "When you do find them, and you arrange to meet, sometimes they don't turn up. When I was dealing with the donor in the US it was costing me £800 to have the sperm shipped over each time. I got into a lot of debt. I lost my home. At times I was an emotional wreck. Every time it didn't work out – well, you can imagine what happened. I was very sad and tired. I couldn't tell people about it because there is this sort of stigma attached to sperm donation. People think you're sad and can't get a guy. I'm from an African family and they have been very supportive though – they waited long enough to have grandchildren. "

Bringing up a child without someone at the very least sharing the responsibility every couple of weeks can be tough. "It is challenging," she says. "I am the only one who wakes up if the baby needs something in the middle of the night. I haven't had enough sleep in 10 months. But I didn't want him to feel like he was the only one of his friends without a dad when he got older, which is the point in having a known donor. I am good friends with the child's father. It is definitely beneficial for my son to have him in his life."

The stigma attached to sperm donation has dissipated in recent months, thanks in no small part to the influence of Hollywood.

In April, the actress Jennifer Aniston hinted that she would consider using a sperm donor to get pregnant. Aniston is set to star in The Baster, released in the UK next year, a romantic comedy about a 40-year-old woman who uses a sperm sample and a turkey baster to have a baby.

Such arrangements are not always ideal for the mother's peace of mind. While the biological father of Joseph's child gets to see their son every two weeks, and pays her a weekly stipend of £30 for the child's upkeep, he still has grounds to make a legal challenge for custody.

"He is a handsome father really, and he was fantastic at the birth," she says. "But it's a bit scary because is he going to wake up one morning, when the child is older, and want him to go live with him? I am scared I will lose [Alex], along with information relating to co-parenting and sperm donation. But I don't think he is that type of guy. I have to trust him."

Needless to say, not everyone is convinced about Joseph's business. "After a couple of contacts it sometimes happens that men suggest "the natural route"; and you also don't get the protection which a licensed clinic would offer in terms of testing for various diseases," says Olivia Montuschi, a spokesperson for the Donor Conception Network. "Also, if people's legal positions are not well laid-out to begin with it can result in a very traumatic court case, or considerable friction within a family. This should not be encouraged." The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has also repeatedly expressed concern over the lack of adequate screening and potentially misleading legal advice from web-based fresh sperm donation services.

But Joseph's love for her son has convinced her she has made the right choice.

"Being a mother is wonderful. There is nothing like it," she says. "It is challenging, but the rewards make you happy. Nothing compares to it. I would do it again in a heartbeat. I love him so much; I am crazy about him."

Sperm donation: The legal issues

* The mother who gives birth to the child is always the mother of the child (the only exception is a surrogacy arrangement).

* Whether the biological father is legally the father of the child, however, and whether the mother's partner (male or female) is recognised as the child's second parent, depends on whether the insemination took place at a licensed clinic or under a private arrangement (for example, through a sperm-parent online introduction service such as feelingbroody.com).

* If artificial insemination took place in a clinic licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, then the mother's partner will automatically legally be the "father" (if male) or the "other parent" (if female), as long as the mother's partner and the sperm donor both sign the necessary paperwork. Recognised parenthood also depends on whether the mother's partner agreed to the mother being inseminated (or to IVF treatment).

* Where the arrangement was a private one rather than through a licensed clinic, legal parenthood for same-sex couples depends on whether or not your arrangement falls within the conditions set out in section 42 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. If it does, the mother's civil partner will be the child's second parent and the biological father will have no legal connection to the son or daughter. If it does not, then the sperm donor counts as the father.

* To meet the conditions of section 42 for same-sex couples, the following four criteria must be fulfilled: the mother must have been artificially inseminated; the insemination must have taken place on or after 6 April 2009 (if it took place before that date, then the old law applies and the sperm donor is the legal father); the mother must have been in a civil partnership at the time of the insemination; and the mother's civil partner must have given their consent to the insemination.

* In a heterosexual couple, the situation is very similar. The conditions of fulfilling section 42 are that the mother has been artificially inseminated; that the mother was married at the time of insemination; and that the mother's husband consented to the insemination.

For more information see alternativefamilylaw.co.uk

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Copenhagen.
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 at 12:15 am (UTC)
What is the situation in Ms Josephs clinic re;screening? FHEA clinics will screen donors for 85% of hereditary disorders. As to anonymity many couples choose never to tell their offspring so the fathers identity is secret. Plus most donor semen is now from Denmark where anonymity is guaranteed. It also means there are lots of blue eyed blonde babies about.
Its loopy
[info]artsariz wrote:
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC)
So much for the institution of marriage and family values. All lost for the sake of a few pounds sterling.
This must be the Tesco of shops/clinics!
Single parents
[info]faridg wrote:
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 at 04:48 pm (UTC)
Nice!!! Now if you want a kid just get your debit card and buy instantly online!! This is ‘easyeverything’ in a big way. The man is no longer considered an important aspect in child rearing!! And at the same time we are expected to treat parenting and family life with more attention, with importance?

All experience points to the fact that a lone parent is far less capable of giving enough attention and care (due to very understandable and acceptable life challenges) to a child whether at young age or teen years. When this happens because of family breakdown it is tragic at least but when women just do it because they ‘wanna’ it’s outrageous!!! What happens when she can’t cope, be it financially or mentally? The lady in the article might have a large supportive family she can rely on but what about others?? Who will look after their kids? The council? More like social services!!!
private sperm donation has pros as well as cons
[info]ml66uk wrote:
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 at 05:19 pm (UTC)
Private sperm donation isn't for everyone, but has its advantages as well as potential drawbacks. Many people want to know who the donor is rather than rely on a clinic's description of him. They also want their children to be able to meet him before they're 18, which is not normally possible if you go through a clinic.

Lesbian couples in particular often want to perform the insemination themselves, without doctors, clinics and paperwork. It's not just about the cost.

There are several free sites where you find a donor without paying btw. Just google "freespermdonors".
Re: private sperm donation has pros as well as cons
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Wednesday, 25 November 2009 at 12:21 am (UTC)
What is the percentage of donors wanting to meet the childs biological father before 18?
Re: private sperm donation has pros as well as cons
[info]ml66uk wrote:
Wednesday, 25 November 2009 at 02:13 am (UTC)
I think you're asking how many donor-conceived people want to meet their donor before they're 18. No-one really knows, but there are several blogs and websites from donor-conceived people who wanted to know who their donor was before they were 18.

The Donor Sibling Registry was formed in 2000 because Ryan Kramer wanted to know who his donor was, or at least get in touch with other people conceived from the same donor (genetic half-siblings). Ryan was ten at the time.

There are a lot of people interesting in finding out about their donor or half-siblings:
"The total number of [Donor Sibling Registry] registrants, including donors, parents and donor conceived people, is currently at 25733. Several thousand more check the site regularly, but are not ready to post their information."

The main problem for many donor-conceived people is that they will never know who their donor was. Anonymous donation has now been ended in the UK, but there are plenty of children already born who will be impatient to wait till they're 18 to find out who their donor was.
Re: private sperm donation has pros as well as cons
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Wednesday, 25 November 2009 at 12:18 pm (UTC)
Dear M, Thank you for your reply. Donor "Sibling" of course does not include the biological Father. In the U.K the limit is ten children, the U.S tightened up after some rogue outfits allowed hundreds from the same Father. many families in the U.K never tell about A.ID but identty, surely, is a basic human right (plus medical histories). Yours Aye, Ron.
DON’T FORGET TO HAVE KIDS, CUNARD’ SLOGAN BEATS BASTERS
[info]e_paul_imhof wrote:
Thursday, 26 November 2009 at 10:26 am (UTC)
Doesn’t HALF THE FUN IS GETTING THERE beat ALL THE FUN IS GETTING NOWHERE? Maybe I am biased. Cynthia bore me 5 wonderful children and used the baster only to prepare Thanksgiving dinner. How can women as attractive as Jennifer Aniston reach 40 without a trusting relationship that produce babies the oldfashioned, loving and responsible way? Frankly, her forthcoming movies’ plot reminds me of turkey rather than romantic comedy I enjoy.
Seyi Joseph had at 26 a good job, a nice house and felt financially secure. Millions of singles work much longer to achieve that much. ‘Bad news girls’ Mika Brezezinski wrote in a recent contribution to Huffington Post. ‘The odds are definitely better on getting the right job than getting a good parner for life. Someone who will grow with you. Someone to develop memories with. Someone who was there in the beginning. Someone who will be there at the end.’
As Ms. Joseph was ready to have a child there was just one tiny problem: she was single. Her courage to resolve it a more personal and practical way any similiarly situated woman did, as far as I know, deserves admiration. Feelingbroody.com might create yet unfathomed problems rendering affordable service to only few unfortunate contemporaries. By contrast Mika relates reasonable advise based on personal experience and applicable to the Global Village’s great middleclass’ typical marriage. Her upcoming book’s title is ‘All things at Once.’ I wish her luck.
Our oldest grandchild’s preschool buddy is a product of artificial insemination. His mother, a registered nurse, decided to take care of her husband suffering from terninal cancer, who danated sperm for the postponed conception. Such loving commitment could raise morale of young troops about to be deployed in Afghanistan or other dangerous spots.
Why does every other new marriage end in divorce? Is it fair to say that many people marry the wrong partner for the wrong reason disregarding that their priorities are at odds? Internet dating services match subscribers with anybody willing to pay a fee, answer a few questions partners for a fee and bet on potential partners the secre digital selection formula suggests. Sharing rooms with a stranger is more likely to stretch travelbudgets than sparkle long lasting love. On the long run matching mariage minded singles may become our mutual marriage insurance cancepts most important function. Our acknowleges simply that my late ex challenged me to dreamn it up. Sadder but wiser she significantly improved it,
Cynthia recognized that a tiny fraction of her legal expense could have prepaid periodic propylactic marrige checkups and a hotline around the clock. Misunderstandings happen. Good communication between puses are essential. A pittance could have resolved all our petty marital conflicts. All problem are managable when bride and groom stipulate in a premarital insurance contract to negotiate rather than litigate custody or visitation of minors, impose a penalty on lawyers procrastinating or ltigating economic issues, rather than settle swiftly and friendly out of court, unless they increase the best timely offer on the table by at least 10%, net of legal expense of course.

DON’T FORGET TO HAVE KIDS, CUNARD’ SLOGAN BEATS BASTERS
[info]e_paul_imhof wrote:
Thursday, 26 November 2009 at 10:29 am (UTC)
ON THANKSGIVING CONSIDER THAT PEACE IN THE FAMILY IS A METAPHOR OF PEACE IN THE WORLD
Divorce trauma scares millions of eligible singles out of the marriage market. Shifting counterporoductive legal expense to marriage maintenace reduces grave social problems ranging from abortion to spousal abuse. Outsourcing reproduction, marriages most important function, causes immigration problems. Schools can’t teach universally acceptet family values, but innovative insurance could. Forget racial, religious, ethnic, social and every other prejudice dividing our society to restore credibility of convential wisdom serving useful purpose.
I dared what nobody did before, called divorcr bluff taking advantage of self-representation leverage I kept calling as opposing counsel raised the ante. An unprecedented appeal to The Supreme Court of California documents merits of offering an estranged spouse off the bat twice as much as opposing counsel produced his client and our 3 minors in 5 years of increasingly bitter litigation. That reconcile Cynthia and me too late to remarry. Though 6 yers my junior she predeceeded me. Her pulse reacted gratefully as I confessed at her deathbed that I never ceased blessing the day we met.
Tricked by a self-described veteran of 500 contested dissolution into initiating litigation on November 11, the very day we started mediation hoping to restore family peace by Christmas, Cynthia outspent me 10:1 to no avail. Isn’t that a metaphor for preventive wars? Miraculous indeed are the ways of the Lord. The empiric IMHOF HYPOTHESIS resulted. Google it if you please.
However, my mission isn’t accompliashed yet. To keep the promise to protect our grandchildren’s marriage against self-serving professional manipulation I need likeminded readers’ support. The cost of developing and introducing innovative insurance is enormous. Count your blessings this Thanksgiving and consider how our concept could help your own children, friends, yourself and our wartorn Global village. Eace in the family is a step towards elusive peace in the world. Make dubious reality shows come real.

Most popular in Life & Style


Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date