Creative minds: the links between mental illness and creativity
All too often, creativity goes hand in hand with mental illness. Now we're starting to understand why. Roger Dobson reports
At first glance, Einstein, Salvador Dali, Tony Hancock, and Beach Boy Brian Wilson would seem to have little in common. Their areas of physics, modern art, comedy, and rock music, are light years apart. So what, if anything, could possibly link minds that gave the world the theory of relativity, great surreal art, iconic comedy, and songs about surfing?
According to new research, psychosis could be the answer. Creative minds in all kinds of areas, from science to poetry, and mathematics to humour, may have traits associated with psychosis. Such traits may allow the unusual and sometimes bizarre thought processes associated with mental illness to fuel creativity. The theory is based on the idea that there is no clear dividing line between the healthy and the mentally ill. Rather, there is a continuum, with some people having psychotic traits without having the debilitating symptoms.
Mental illnesses have been around for thousands of years. Evolutionary theory suggests that in order for them to be still here, there must be some kind of survival advantage to them. If they were wholly bad, it's argued, natural selection would have seen them off long ago. In some cases the advantage is clear. Anxiety, for example, can be a mental illness with severe symptoms and consequences, but it is also a trait that at a non-clinical level has survival advantages. In healthy proportions, it keeps us alert and on our toes when threats are sensed.
It's now increasingly being argued that there are survival advantages to others forms of illness, too, because of the links between the traits associated with them and creativity. "It can be difficult for people to reconcile mental illness with the idea that traits may not be disabling. While people accept that there are health benefits to anxiety, they are more wary of schizophrenia and manic depression," says Professor Gordon Claridge, emeritus professor of abnormal psychology at Oxford University, who has edited a special edition of the journal Personality and Individual Differences, looking at the links between mental illness and creativity. "There is now a feeling that these traits have survived because they have some adaptive value. To be mildly manic depressive or mildly schizophrenic brings a flexibility of thought, an openness, and risk-taking behaviour, which does have some adaptive value in creativity. The price paid for having those traits is that some will have mental illness."
Research is providing support for the idea that creative people are more likely to have traits associated with mental illness. One study found that the incidence of mood disorders, suicide and institutionalisation to be 20 times higher among major British and Irish poets in the 200 years up to 1800. Other studies have shown that psychiatric patients perform better in tests of abstract thinking. Another study, based on 291 eminent and creative men in different fields, found that 69 per cent had a mental disorder of some kind. Scientists were the least affected, while artists and writers had increased diagnoses of psychosis.
"Most theorists agree that it is not the full-blown illness itself, but the milder forms of psychosis that are at the root of the association between creativity and madness," says Emilie Glazer, experimental psychologist and author of one of the Oxford journal papers. "The underlying traits linked with mild psychopathology enhance creative ability. In severe form, they are debilitating."
Research is also showing that traits associated with different mental illnesses have different effects on creativity. The creativity needed to develop the theory of relativity, is, for example, very different from that required for producing surreal paintings, or poetry.
Research is now homing in on whether the psychosis that is linked to different types of creativity comes through schizophrenia and schizotypy traits, through manic-depressive or cyclothymic traits, or traits associated with the autism and Asperger's disorders. A study at the University of Newcastle found significant differences between artistically creative people and mathematicians. While the artists showed schizotypy traits, mathematicians did not, and that fits in with the idea that mathematics and engineering, which require attention to detail, are closer to the autistic traits than to psychosis.
"Affective disorder perpetuates creativity limited to the normal," says Glazer, "while the schizoid person is predisposed to a sense of detachment from the world, free from social boundaries and able to consider alternative frameworks, producing creativity within the revolutionary sphere. Newton and Einstein's schizotypal orientation, for instance, enabled their revolutionary stamp in the sciences."
The stereotypical images of mad scientists working alone and preferring foaming beakers to friends, abound in literature, and reflect a popular perception of the aloof, detached and obsessive genius. But the idea goes back even further. 2000 years ago in Rome, the philosopher Seneca was obviously already on the case when he wrote: "There is no great genius without a tincture of madness."
It's no joke: Comedians and depression
Heard the one about the man who went to the doctor to get help for his depression? He's told to go and see a show with a well known comedian who would make him laugh and lift his spirits. "But that's me," says the patient. "I'm the comedian."
The joke, related by Rod Martin, author of 'The Psychology of Humor – An Integrative Approach', is apparently something of a favourite among comedians, who are known to be prone to depression, from the late Tony Hancock and Spike Milligan, to Stephen Fry and Paul Merton.
One theory is that humour is developed in response to depression, and that it works as a coping mechanism. One study, reported by Martin, looked at 55 male and 14 female comedians, all famous and successful. It found that comedians tended to be superior in intelligence, angry, suspicious, and depressed.
In addition, their early lives were characterised by suffering, isolation, and feelings of deprivation, and, he says, they used humour as a defence against anxiety, converting their feel ings of suppressed rage from physical to verbal aggression. "The comedic skills required for a successful career may well be developed as a means of compensating for earlier psychological losses and difficulties," says Martin. A second study did not find higher levels, although comedians had significantly greater preoccupation with themes of good and evil, unworthiness, self-deprecation, and duty and responsibility.
"A significant proportion of comedians do seem to suffer more with depression," says Professor Gordon Claridge, emeritus professor of abnormal psychology at Oxford University. "Comedy seems to act as a way of dealing with depression. I think there is an emotionality and cognitive style that goes along with these depressive disorders which seems to feed creativity."
Salvador Dali was not just a great artist. He also met the criteria for several psychosis diagnoses, a mixture of schizophrenic and depressive. He may also have been paranoid, as well having antisocial, histrionic, and narcissistic disorders. "Dalí and his contribution to the history of art highlights that abnormality is not necessarily disagreeable – or to be so readily dismissed as a sign of neurological disease. For without his instability, Dalí may not have created the great art that he did," says Caroline Murphy of Oxford.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited






Comments
Szaz's work is very interesting and gives an alternate viewpoint, that it is us "normal" thinking people that are mentally ill but we carry the vote because there is more of us to create this sense of normalcy, he treads the boards on thinking what would our world look like if the greater majority of us were stricken with such illnesses like mania, schizophrenia, through the floor depression and there is much merit in the human spirit being great adapters even when faced with the most horrendous of stimuli or factors.
I would recommend reading up on this fellow and other proponents of anti-psychiatry simply for the rare glimpse at how our lives could be.
About two weeks ago I jumped off a local parking deck trying to do myself in again. I landed on grass that was wet and soft enough from a recent sprinkler and lived.
All I've learned in my 16 year career in therapy and on anti-psychotic and SSRI drugs is to stay the H away from hard booze. I doubt I'll make it to 40.
Fifteen years ago her book "Touched With Fire - Manic-Depressive Illness and the Artistic Temperament" provided a substantive review of the conclusions explored in this article.
As we do not equate near-sightedness with superior vision, or consider sprained ankles a boon to athletes, we shold not equate psychosis with creativity.
It seems more likely that the brains of highly creative people are somehow functioning in a superior way. If so, then they would be more likely to be sensitive to pressures and demands than an ordinary functioning brain. There has to be some kind of psychic fuel behind the brain's activity, and the quality of this fuel, produced by either a healthy or unhealthy lifestyle, would explain why the creative are apt to depressive moods.
Unfortunately, using natural selection to explain the brain is like trying to build a likeness of the human form using only a few bricks of lego, and using such a crude system to adjust behaviour is like trying to fix DNA with a hammer.
Interested readers might want to look for a catalogue of the art exhibit 'Melancholie' (Paris, Grand Palais, 2005).
kai101
As an artist/intellectual myself, with lots of creative people as friends, and having observed them in their lives over decades, it is obvious to me that the psychology of 'the creative mind' does NOT differ from that of the 'normal' mind. An artist's tools are emotional faculties without the support of rational argument; this makes him vulnerable to attacks and rejection. This explains the more stable minds of scientists: they function in a rational way, which provides them with emotional strength because of their reliance upon rational argument. An original artist has much more difficulty to justify (also to himself) what he is doing, and much of the struggle to get there where he needs to be is a traumatic trajectory in which his normal human condition suffers from the unique position in which he has been forced by the interaction between individual and environment. Hence the irrational and sometimes destructive reactions and behavior of many artists - that is, after the Ancien Regime period in which artists were artisans and fully included in a social system which left no room for much individuality.
The conslucion can only be that the research as mentioned in the article is totally pointless, useless and seriously flawed.
To me this sounds like some kind of serious anti-social disorder rooted in pre-verbal rage against those who are more vital and have, over all, more interesting lives, and a more direct and readily accessible connection to the divine, than your average emeritus professor who's entire functioning level would self-destruct if you took away their propensity to want to put everything in smaller and smaller compartments. Maybe they had a sibling who was favored over them from birth and they were left with blocks to love instead of parents.
Perhaps we should be asking ourselves more about our own perception of what exactly is insane. It seems a broadening would be in order as opposed to this kind of narrowing.
At any rate I would like a similar study done on groups of people who are in charge of bombing, torturing and stealing natural resources from poor people who almost always have dark skin. What is the pattern of psychosis and mental instability in that group?
So ALL geniuses are insane, yet without geniuses there would be no advancement in art and science, thus no advancement of humanity. If it were not for "mental illness" i suppose we'd all still be living in caves instead of being crazy enough to take on the harsh wild world around us.
What is insane in my opinion is those who would do nothing great with their lives and settle for a meaningless existence
by the bank of a river under a cresent moon or be surrounded by the specticals calloused and fatigued scared a representation of yourself bad product from a bad society ugly and repugnant becoming a habit then our habits become duty expecting nothing of anything we have not altered.
Me... I can't stand the grotesqueness of controlling people wanting to be rid of me only because I don't prescribe to their ways.
Cheers,
Trevon
Credit Score Range
Cure Anxiety Attacks
Thanks to the indy for this one I feel a lot better about myself for reading it........
Is the cast set at the genetic level and all else (isolation, depression, in varying degrees), a natural by-product of the genetic make-up of an individual? And of course the combination of genes is in itself a conundrum. One creative person may be nervous, lacking confidence, introverted and depressed. Another might be confident, introverted and content in his/her own company.
I imagine there is a substantial amount of research in this area (I'm no expert), without any significant consensus.
The comedian Spike Milligan often used the concrete form of thinking is his sketches - that is taking things literally, something that Paul Merton also utilises. Now this taken in isolation is one of the features of so called schizophrenic thought. Yet for these comedians it is used as comic contrast and with often ludricuously funny results (or bizarre depending on your evaluations). Yet this thinking occurs,or is placed in a social structure which to a certain extent encourages it and holds it in check. Without this structure and when the impulse behind it exceeds the ability to use it, it collapses in mania or depression.
If the move is into psychosis proper and accompanying delusion then the structure is just not there to make any meaningful connection. The individual issues assertions which for them are imbued with deep meaning but they fail to communicate that to the audience. They are lost in a set of structures which in many of the ramblings I have been priviliged to hear (and that is no sarcasm, and they have been many) no connections which can be communicated can be made. It might therefore be interesting to say, that the Schizophrenic is the only sane individual in a sick society (a view of the the late RD Laing) but unless they can say how they are sane and others sick and how the sickness of the others can be cured its a meaning that only the individual possesses.
It is this very private world, which no-one shares, and importantly, cannot share, that the psychotic inhabits as a delusion. The creative person with a tendency to ascribe meaning where others see none, (a analagous feature of psychosis proper), remains creative, so long as that vision is communicable.
Of course getting the psychotic to talk about their world view is a step towards shared meaning : taking medication alone just dampens an impulse and casts the individual aside into a pit.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Your over-inclusiveness seems a little misplaced, even sloppy, to me. Has it occurred to you that the evolution you mention may involve such divergent branches that the unifying term "human"--or, for that matter, any sort of unitary classification-- may no longer make sense?
Surely it is crazy to think otherwise, but we are wrong. We are always wrong about something. If you are politically correct, the trick of the day is figuring out exactly what you are wrong about, and articulating it into words that the common person can understand. This trial, you will see, bridges the gap between craziness and coherence.
It is much more complicated than that, but we must have faith. Have faith in the possibility of a beautiful order of higher justice. Even if it is false. It is only false because it is not true yet. The truth is only circumstantial. That which dies recedes into falsehood. That which is born becomes true.
Firstly, there's loads of people who suffer mental distress and are not creative types. They are called phd students.
Secondly, rather than there being an evolutionary advantage to mental ill-health, it is the case that there is no competitive disadvantage to it. Let's be honest, it doesn't take too make a baby. The human reproductive drive is just not that picky.
Thirdly, we shouldn't explain away talent. Perhaps, Tony Hanncock was funny because he had naturally a good sense of humour?
Fourthly, maybe creativity leads to mental health problems rather than the other way round, as this article suggests. Paranoia requires a good imagination.
Also, to be creative, one needs to be alone to produce the work. With lack of social contact and constraint may come the excentricity associated with madness. Thus, the link between creativity and madness is due to the social condition of the worker rather than any direct causality.
Finally, we need to be cautious of 'artist-bullshit'. It is all too easy to get caught up in the idea of the tormented genius who suffers for all of us (who we in turn have to suffer). Creativity is as much about discipline as flight of fancy. What's the cliche? 90 per cent perspiration and 10 per cent inspiration. Creative types are creative because they work at it. Being mad alone won't make you a great genius.
I have interviewed thousands of patients over the years and it is clear to me (yep all anecdotal evidence) that we spend millions of dollars yearly treating as illness what are normal personality traits...odd traits, but normal. How much great art and general creativity are we losing to the indiscriminate use of mood-controlling drugs? While the loss of life and function are terrible things on an individual basis, what the "crazies" leave behind is almost worth their suffering (provided they suffered at all).
From Yeats (depression from losing his family and then dying of TB himself) to Hendrix (likely a manic personality that went over the edge - I mean, look at the clothes) I grieve for their suffering but I rejoice in their creations. All hail the mildly deranged.